Cargando…

A Comparison of the Performance and Application Differences Between Manual and Automated Patch-Clamp Techniques

The patch clamp technique is commonly used in electrophysiological experiments and offers direct insight into ion channel properties through the characterization of ion channel activity. This technique can be used to elucidate the interaction between a drug and a specific ion channel at different co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yajuan, Xiao, Xin, Liang, Zhiyuan, Li
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bentham Open 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3549544/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23346269
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1875397301206010087
_version_ 1782256440098947072
author Yajuan, Xiao
Xin, Liang
Zhiyuan, Li
author_facet Yajuan, Xiao
Xin, Liang
Zhiyuan, Li
author_sort Yajuan, Xiao
collection PubMed
description The patch clamp technique is commonly used in electrophysiological experiments and offers direct insight into ion channel properties through the characterization of ion channel activity. This technique can be used to elucidate the interaction between a drug and a specific ion channel at different conformational states to understand the ion channel modulators’ mechanisms. The patch clamp technique is regarded as a gold standard for ion channel research; however, it suffers from low throughput and high personnel costs. In the last decade, the development of several automated electrophysiology platforms has greatly increased the screen throughput of whole cell electrophysiological recordings. New advancements in the automated patch clamp systems have aimed to provide high data quality, high content, and high throughput. However, due to the limitations noted above, automated patch clamp systems are not capable of replacing manual patch clamp systems in ion channel research. While automated patch clamp systems are useful for screening large amounts of compounds in cell lines that stably express high levels of ion channels, the manual patch clamp technique is still necessary for studying ion channel properties in some research areas and for specific cell types, including primary cells that have mixed cell types and differentiated cells that derive from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) or embryonic stem cells (ESCs). Therefore, further improvements in flexibility with regard to cell types and data quality will broaden the applications of the automated patch clamp systems in both academia and industry.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3549544
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Bentham Open
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35495442013-01-23 A Comparison of the Performance and Application Differences Between Manual and Automated Patch-Clamp Techniques Yajuan, Xiao Xin, Liang Zhiyuan, Li Curr Chem Genomics Article The patch clamp technique is commonly used in electrophysiological experiments and offers direct insight into ion channel properties through the characterization of ion channel activity. This technique can be used to elucidate the interaction between a drug and a specific ion channel at different conformational states to understand the ion channel modulators’ mechanisms. The patch clamp technique is regarded as a gold standard for ion channel research; however, it suffers from low throughput and high personnel costs. In the last decade, the development of several automated electrophysiology platforms has greatly increased the screen throughput of whole cell electrophysiological recordings. New advancements in the automated patch clamp systems have aimed to provide high data quality, high content, and high throughput. However, due to the limitations noted above, automated patch clamp systems are not capable of replacing manual patch clamp systems in ion channel research. While automated patch clamp systems are useful for screening large amounts of compounds in cell lines that stably express high levels of ion channels, the manual patch clamp technique is still necessary for studying ion channel properties in some research areas and for specific cell types, including primary cells that have mixed cell types and differentiated cells that derive from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) or embryonic stem cells (ESCs). Therefore, further improvements in flexibility with regard to cell types and data quality will broaden the applications of the automated patch clamp systems in both academia and industry. Bentham Open 2012-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3549544/ /pubmed/23346269 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1875397301206010087 Text en © Yajuan et al.; Licensee Bentham Open. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Yajuan, Xiao
Xin, Liang
Zhiyuan, Li
A Comparison of the Performance and Application Differences Between Manual and Automated Patch-Clamp Techniques
title A Comparison of the Performance and Application Differences Between Manual and Automated Patch-Clamp Techniques
title_full A Comparison of the Performance and Application Differences Between Manual and Automated Patch-Clamp Techniques
title_fullStr A Comparison of the Performance and Application Differences Between Manual and Automated Patch-Clamp Techniques
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of the Performance and Application Differences Between Manual and Automated Patch-Clamp Techniques
title_short A Comparison of the Performance and Application Differences Between Manual and Automated Patch-Clamp Techniques
title_sort comparison of the performance and application differences between manual and automated patch-clamp techniques
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3549544/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23346269
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1875397301206010087
work_keys_str_mv AT yajuanxiao acomparisonoftheperformanceandapplicationdifferencesbetweenmanualandautomatedpatchclamptechniques
AT xinliang acomparisonoftheperformanceandapplicationdifferencesbetweenmanualandautomatedpatchclamptechniques
AT zhiyuanli acomparisonoftheperformanceandapplicationdifferencesbetweenmanualandautomatedpatchclamptechniques
AT yajuanxiao comparisonoftheperformanceandapplicationdifferencesbetweenmanualandautomatedpatchclamptechniques
AT xinliang comparisonoftheperformanceandapplicationdifferencesbetweenmanualandautomatedpatchclamptechniques
AT zhiyuanli comparisonoftheperformanceandapplicationdifferencesbetweenmanualandautomatedpatchclamptechniques