Cargando…

Evaluation of a new PVC-free catheter material for intermittent catheterization: A prospective, randomized, crossover study

OBJECTIVE. Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) is commonly used as a catheter material in catheters for clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) but, owing mainly to environmental concerns, a PVC-free material has been proposed. The objective of this study was to compare patients' tolerability for cathete...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Johansson, Kerstin, Greis, Gunvor, Johansson, Birgit, Grundtmann, Agneta, Pahlby, Yvonne, Törn, Solveig, Axelberg, Hanna, Carlsson, Petrea
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Informa Healthcare 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3549608/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22762536
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00365599.2012.696136
_version_ 1782256446893719552
author Johansson, Kerstin
Greis, Gunvor
Johansson, Birgit
Grundtmann, Agneta
Pahlby, Yvonne
Törn, Solveig
Axelberg, Hanna
Carlsson, Petrea
author_facet Johansson, Kerstin
Greis, Gunvor
Johansson, Birgit
Grundtmann, Agneta
Pahlby, Yvonne
Törn, Solveig
Axelberg, Hanna
Carlsson, Petrea
author_sort Johansson, Kerstin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE. Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) is commonly used as a catheter material in catheters for clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) but, owing mainly to environmental concerns, a PVC-free material has been proposed. The objective of this study was to compare patients' tolerability for catheters made of PVC and a newly developed PVC-free material. MATERIAL AND METHODS. This was a prospective, randomized, crossover study in 104 male patients with maintained urethra sensibility who practised CIC. The patients evaluated in a randomized order a PVC and a PVC-free LoFric® catheter after 1 week's use of each. The material properties and tolerability, i.e. reported perceived discomfort, of each catheter were compared and adverse events documented. RESULTS. Twenty-nine (28%) and 15 (14%) patients reported discomfort when using the PVC catheter and the PVC-free LoFric catheter, respectively. A comparison showed that five patients (5%) reported discomfort with the PVC-free and not with the PVC catheter, and 19 patients (18%) reported discomfort with the PVC and not with the PVC-free catheter (p = 0.0066). Forty patients reported a total of 91 adverse events, of which the most common were discomfort in terms of pain, a burning sensation and bleeding. CONCLUSIONS. Generally low discomfort rates were reported in the study population, suggesting a high tolerance for CIC with catheters of both the PVC and the PVC-free materials. The lowest discomfort was, however, found when CIC was performed using the PVC-free LoFric catheter.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3549608
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Informa Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35496082013-01-24 Evaluation of a new PVC-free catheter material for intermittent catheterization: A prospective, randomized, crossover study Johansson, Kerstin Greis, Gunvor Johansson, Birgit Grundtmann, Agneta Pahlby, Yvonne Törn, Solveig Axelberg, Hanna Carlsson, Petrea Scand J Urol Original Articles OBJECTIVE. Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) is commonly used as a catheter material in catheters for clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) but, owing mainly to environmental concerns, a PVC-free material has been proposed. The objective of this study was to compare patients' tolerability for catheters made of PVC and a newly developed PVC-free material. MATERIAL AND METHODS. This was a prospective, randomized, crossover study in 104 male patients with maintained urethra sensibility who practised CIC. The patients evaluated in a randomized order a PVC and a PVC-free LoFric® catheter after 1 week's use of each. The material properties and tolerability, i.e. reported perceived discomfort, of each catheter were compared and adverse events documented. RESULTS. Twenty-nine (28%) and 15 (14%) patients reported discomfort when using the PVC catheter and the PVC-free LoFric catheter, respectively. A comparison showed that five patients (5%) reported discomfort with the PVC-free and not with the PVC catheter, and 19 patients (18%) reported discomfort with the PVC and not with the PVC-free catheter (p = 0.0066). Forty patients reported a total of 91 adverse events, of which the most common were discomfort in terms of pain, a burning sensation and bleeding. CONCLUSIONS. Generally low discomfort rates were reported in the study population, suggesting a high tolerance for CIC with catheters of both the PVC and the PVC-free materials. The lowest discomfort was, however, found when CIC was performed using the PVC-free LoFric catheter. Informa Healthcare 2013-02 2012-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3549608/ /pubmed/22762536 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00365599.2012.696136 Text en © 2013 Informa Healthcare http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an free article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the source is credited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Johansson, Kerstin
Greis, Gunvor
Johansson, Birgit
Grundtmann, Agneta
Pahlby, Yvonne
Törn, Solveig
Axelberg, Hanna
Carlsson, Petrea
Evaluation of a new PVC-free catheter material for intermittent catheterization: A prospective, randomized, crossover study
title Evaluation of a new PVC-free catheter material for intermittent catheterization: A prospective, randomized, crossover study
title_full Evaluation of a new PVC-free catheter material for intermittent catheterization: A prospective, randomized, crossover study
title_fullStr Evaluation of a new PVC-free catheter material for intermittent catheterization: A prospective, randomized, crossover study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a new PVC-free catheter material for intermittent catheterization: A prospective, randomized, crossover study
title_short Evaluation of a new PVC-free catheter material for intermittent catheterization: A prospective, randomized, crossover study
title_sort evaluation of a new pvc-free catheter material for intermittent catheterization: a prospective, randomized, crossover study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3549608/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22762536
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00365599.2012.696136
work_keys_str_mv AT johanssonkerstin evaluationofanewpvcfreecathetermaterialforintermittentcatheterizationaprospectiverandomizedcrossoverstudy
AT greisgunvor evaluationofanewpvcfreecathetermaterialforintermittentcatheterizationaprospectiverandomizedcrossoverstudy
AT johanssonbirgit evaluationofanewpvcfreecathetermaterialforintermittentcatheterizationaprospectiverandomizedcrossoverstudy
AT grundtmannagneta evaluationofanewpvcfreecathetermaterialforintermittentcatheterizationaprospectiverandomizedcrossoverstudy
AT pahlbyyvonne evaluationofanewpvcfreecathetermaterialforintermittentcatheterizationaprospectiverandomizedcrossoverstudy
AT tornsolveig evaluationofanewpvcfreecathetermaterialforintermittentcatheterizationaprospectiverandomizedcrossoverstudy
AT axelberghanna evaluationofanewpvcfreecathetermaterialforintermittentcatheterizationaprospectiverandomizedcrossoverstudy
AT carlssonpetrea evaluationofanewpvcfreecathetermaterialforintermittentcatheterizationaprospectiverandomizedcrossoverstudy