Cargando…
Evaluation of a new PVC-free catheter material for intermittent catheterization: A prospective, randomized, crossover study
OBJECTIVE. Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) is commonly used as a catheter material in catheters for clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) but, owing mainly to environmental concerns, a PVC-free material has been proposed. The objective of this study was to compare patients' tolerability for cathete...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Informa Healthcare
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3549608/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22762536 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00365599.2012.696136 |
_version_ | 1782256446893719552 |
---|---|
author | Johansson, Kerstin Greis, Gunvor Johansson, Birgit Grundtmann, Agneta Pahlby, Yvonne Törn, Solveig Axelberg, Hanna Carlsson, Petrea |
author_facet | Johansson, Kerstin Greis, Gunvor Johansson, Birgit Grundtmann, Agneta Pahlby, Yvonne Törn, Solveig Axelberg, Hanna Carlsson, Petrea |
author_sort | Johansson, Kerstin |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE. Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) is commonly used as a catheter material in catheters for clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) but, owing mainly to environmental concerns, a PVC-free material has been proposed. The objective of this study was to compare patients' tolerability for catheters made of PVC and a newly developed PVC-free material. MATERIAL AND METHODS. This was a prospective, randomized, crossover study in 104 male patients with maintained urethra sensibility who practised CIC. The patients evaluated in a randomized order a PVC and a PVC-free LoFric® catheter after 1 week's use of each. The material properties and tolerability, i.e. reported perceived discomfort, of each catheter were compared and adverse events documented. RESULTS. Twenty-nine (28%) and 15 (14%) patients reported discomfort when using the PVC catheter and the PVC-free LoFric catheter, respectively. A comparison showed that five patients (5%) reported discomfort with the PVC-free and not with the PVC catheter, and 19 patients (18%) reported discomfort with the PVC and not with the PVC-free catheter (p = 0.0066). Forty patients reported a total of 91 adverse events, of which the most common were discomfort in terms of pain, a burning sensation and bleeding. CONCLUSIONS. Generally low discomfort rates were reported in the study population, suggesting a high tolerance for CIC with catheters of both the PVC and the PVC-free materials. The lowest discomfort was, however, found when CIC was performed using the PVC-free LoFric catheter. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3549608 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Informa Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35496082013-01-24 Evaluation of a new PVC-free catheter material for intermittent catheterization: A prospective, randomized, crossover study Johansson, Kerstin Greis, Gunvor Johansson, Birgit Grundtmann, Agneta Pahlby, Yvonne Törn, Solveig Axelberg, Hanna Carlsson, Petrea Scand J Urol Original Articles OBJECTIVE. Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) is commonly used as a catheter material in catheters for clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) but, owing mainly to environmental concerns, a PVC-free material has been proposed. The objective of this study was to compare patients' tolerability for catheters made of PVC and a newly developed PVC-free material. MATERIAL AND METHODS. This was a prospective, randomized, crossover study in 104 male patients with maintained urethra sensibility who practised CIC. The patients evaluated in a randomized order a PVC and a PVC-free LoFric® catheter after 1 week's use of each. The material properties and tolerability, i.e. reported perceived discomfort, of each catheter were compared and adverse events documented. RESULTS. Twenty-nine (28%) and 15 (14%) patients reported discomfort when using the PVC catheter and the PVC-free LoFric catheter, respectively. A comparison showed that five patients (5%) reported discomfort with the PVC-free and not with the PVC catheter, and 19 patients (18%) reported discomfort with the PVC and not with the PVC-free catheter (p = 0.0066). Forty patients reported a total of 91 adverse events, of which the most common were discomfort in terms of pain, a burning sensation and bleeding. CONCLUSIONS. Generally low discomfort rates were reported in the study population, suggesting a high tolerance for CIC with catheters of both the PVC and the PVC-free materials. The lowest discomfort was, however, found when CIC was performed using the PVC-free LoFric catheter. Informa Healthcare 2013-02 2012-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3549608/ /pubmed/22762536 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00365599.2012.696136 Text en © 2013 Informa Healthcare http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an free article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the source is credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Johansson, Kerstin Greis, Gunvor Johansson, Birgit Grundtmann, Agneta Pahlby, Yvonne Törn, Solveig Axelberg, Hanna Carlsson, Petrea Evaluation of a new PVC-free catheter material for intermittent catheterization: A prospective, randomized, crossover study |
title | Evaluation of a new PVC-free catheter material for intermittent catheterization: A prospective, randomized, crossover study |
title_full | Evaluation of a new PVC-free catheter material for intermittent catheterization: A prospective, randomized, crossover study |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of a new PVC-free catheter material for intermittent catheterization: A prospective, randomized, crossover study |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of a new PVC-free catheter material for intermittent catheterization: A prospective, randomized, crossover study |
title_short | Evaluation of a new PVC-free catheter material for intermittent catheterization: A prospective, randomized, crossover study |
title_sort | evaluation of a new pvc-free catheter material for intermittent catheterization: a prospective, randomized, crossover study |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3549608/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22762536 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00365599.2012.696136 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT johanssonkerstin evaluationofanewpvcfreecathetermaterialforintermittentcatheterizationaprospectiverandomizedcrossoverstudy AT greisgunvor evaluationofanewpvcfreecathetermaterialforintermittentcatheterizationaprospectiverandomizedcrossoverstudy AT johanssonbirgit evaluationofanewpvcfreecathetermaterialforintermittentcatheterizationaprospectiverandomizedcrossoverstudy AT grundtmannagneta evaluationofanewpvcfreecathetermaterialforintermittentcatheterizationaprospectiverandomizedcrossoverstudy AT pahlbyyvonne evaluationofanewpvcfreecathetermaterialforintermittentcatheterizationaprospectiverandomizedcrossoverstudy AT tornsolveig evaluationofanewpvcfreecathetermaterialforintermittentcatheterizationaprospectiverandomizedcrossoverstudy AT axelberghanna evaluationofanewpvcfreecathetermaterialforintermittentcatheterizationaprospectiverandomizedcrossoverstudy AT carlssonpetrea evaluationofanewpvcfreecathetermaterialforintermittentcatheterizationaprospectiverandomizedcrossoverstudy |