Cargando…

Mechanisms underpinning effective peer support: a qualitative analysis of interactions between expert peers and patients newly-diagnosed with bipolar disorder

BACKGROUND: The increasing burden on mental health services has led to the growing use of peer support in psychological interventions. Four theoretical mechanisms have been proposed to underpin effective peer support: advice grounded in experiential knowledge, social support, social comparison and t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Proudfoot, Judith G, Jayawant, Amisha, Whitton, Alexis E, Parker, Gordon, Manicavasagar, Vijaya, Smith, Meg, Nicholas, Jennifer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3549948/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23140497
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-12-196
_version_ 1782256505715687424
author Proudfoot, Judith G
Jayawant, Amisha
Whitton, Alexis E
Parker, Gordon
Manicavasagar, Vijaya
Smith, Meg
Nicholas, Jennifer
author_facet Proudfoot, Judith G
Jayawant, Amisha
Whitton, Alexis E
Parker, Gordon
Manicavasagar, Vijaya
Smith, Meg
Nicholas, Jennifer
author_sort Proudfoot, Judith G
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The increasing burden on mental health services has led to the growing use of peer support in psychological interventions. Four theoretical mechanisms have been proposed to underpin effective peer support: advice grounded in experiential knowledge, social support, social comparison and the helper therapy principle. However, there has been a lack of studies examining whether these mechanisms are also evident in clinical populations in which interpersonal dysfunction is common, such as bipolar disorder. METHOD: This qualitative study, conducted alongside a randomized controlled trial, examined whether the four mechanisms proposed to underpin effective peer support were expressed in the email exchange between 44 individuals newly-diagnosed with bipolar disorder and their Informed Supporters (n = 4), over the course of a supported online psychoeducation program for bipolar disorder. A total of 104 text segments were extracted and coded. The data were complemented by face-to-face interviews with three of the four Informed Supporters who participated in the study. RESULTS: Qualitative analyses of the email interchange and interview transcripts revealed rich examples of all four mechanisms. The data illustrated how the involvement of Informed Supporters resulted in numerous benefits for the newly-diagnosed individuals, including the provision of practical strategies for illness management as well as emotional support throughout the intervention. The Informed Supporters encouraged the development of positive relationships with mental health services, and acted as role models for treatment adherence. The Informed Supporters themselves reported gaining a number of benefits from helping, including a greater sense of connectedness with the mental health system, as well as a broader knowledge of illness management strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Examples of the mechanisms underpinning effective peer support were found in the sample of emails from individuals with newly-diagnosed bipolar disorder and their Informed Supporters. Experiential knowledge, social support, social comparison and helper therapy were apparent, even within a clinical population for whom relationship difficulties are common. Trial registration number ACTRN12608000411347.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3549948
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35499482013-01-24 Mechanisms underpinning effective peer support: a qualitative analysis of interactions between expert peers and patients newly-diagnosed with bipolar disorder Proudfoot, Judith G Jayawant, Amisha Whitton, Alexis E Parker, Gordon Manicavasagar, Vijaya Smith, Meg Nicholas, Jennifer BMC Psychiatry Research Article BACKGROUND: The increasing burden on mental health services has led to the growing use of peer support in psychological interventions. Four theoretical mechanisms have been proposed to underpin effective peer support: advice grounded in experiential knowledge, social support, social comparison and the helper therapy principle. However, there has been a lack of studies examining whether these mechanisms are also evident in clinical populations in which interpersonal dysfunction is common, such as bipolar disorder. METHOD: This qualitative study, conducted alongside a randomized controlled trial, examined whether the four mechanisms proposed to underpin effective peer support were expressed in the email exchange between 44 individuals newly-diagnosed with bipolar disorder and their Informed Supporters (n = 4), over the course of a supported online psychoeducation program for bipolar disorder. A total of 104 text segments were extracted and coded. The data were complemented by face-to-face interviews with three of the four Informed Supporters who participated in the study. RESULTS: Qualitative analyses of the email interchange and interview transcripts revealed rich examples of all four mechanisms. The data illustrated how the involvement of Informed Supporters resulted in numerous benefits for the newly-diagnosed individuals, including the provision of practical strategies for illness management as well as emotional support throughout the intervention. The Informed Supporters encouraged the development of positive relationships with mental health services, and acted as role models for treatment adherence. The Informed Supporters themselves reported gaining a number of benefits from helping, including a greater sense of connectedness with the mental health system, as well as a broader knowledge of illness management strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Examples of the mechanisms underpinning effective peer support were found in the sample of emails from individuals with newly-diagnosed bipolar disorder and their Informed Supporters. Experiential knowledge, social support, social comparison and helper therapy were apparent, even within a clinical population for whom relationship difficulties are common. Trial registration number ACTRN12608000411347. BioMed Central 2012-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3549948/ /pubmed/23140497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-12-196 Text en Copyright ©2012 Proudfoot et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Proudfoot, Judith G
Jayawant, Amisha
Whitton, Alexis E
Parker, Gordon
Manicavasagar, Vijaya
Smith, Meg
Nicholas, Jennifer
Mechanisms underpinning effective peer support: a qualitative analysis of interactions between expert peers and patients newly-diagnosed with bipolar disorder
title Mechanisms underpinning effective peer support: a qualitative analysis of interactions between expert peers and patients newly-diagnosed with bipolar disorder
title_full Mechanisms underpinning effective peer support: a qualitative analysis of interactions between expert peers and patients newly-diagnosed with bipolar disorder
title_fullStr Mechanisms underpinning effective peer support: a qualitative analysis of interactions between expert peers and patients newly-diagnosed with bipolar disorder
title_full_unstemmed Mechanisms underpinning effective peer support: a qualitative analysis of interactions between expert peers and patients newly-diagnosed with bipolar disorder
title_short Mechanisms underpinning effective peer support: a qualitative analysis of interactions between expert peers and patients newly-diagnosed with bipolar disorder
title_sort mechanisms underpinning effective peer support: a qualitative analysis of interactions between expert peers and patients newly-diagnosed with bipolar disorder
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3549948/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23140497
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-12-196
work_keys_str_mv AT proudfootjudithg mechanismsunderpinningeffectivepeersupportaqualitativeanalysisofinteractionsbetweenexpertpeersandpatientsnewlydiagnosedwithbipolardisorder
AT jayawantamisha mechanismsunderpinningeffectivepeersupportaqualitativeanalysisofinteractionsbetweenexpertpeersandpatientsnewlydiagnosedwithbipolardisorder
AT whittonalexise mechanismsunderpinningeffectivepeersupportaqualitativeanalysisofinteractionsbetweenexpertpeersandpatientsnewlydiagnosedwithbipolardisorder
AT parkergordon mechanismsunderpinningeffectivepeersupportaqualitativeanalysisofinteractionsbetweenexpertpeersandpatientsnewlydiagnosedwithbipolardisorder
AT manicavasagarvijaya mechanismsunderpinningeffectivepeersupportaqualitativeanalysisofinteractionsbetweenexpertpeersandpatientsnewlydiagnosedwithbipolardisorder
AT smithmeg mechanismsunderpinningeffectivepeersupportaqualitativeanalysisofinteractionsbetweenexpertpeersandpatientsnewlydiagnosedwithbipolardisorder
AT nicholasjennifer mechanismsunderpinningeffectivepeersupportaqualitativeanalysisofinteractionsbetweenexpertpeersandpatientsnewlydiagnosedwithbipolardisorder