Cargando…
Mechanisms underpinning effective peer support: a qualitative analysis of interactions between expert peers and patients newly-diagnosed with bipolar disorder
BACKGROUND: The increasing burden on mental health services has led to the growing use of peer support in psychological interventions. Four theoretical mechanisms have been proposed to underpin effective peer support: advice grounded in experiential knowledge, social support, social comparison and t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3549948/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23140497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-12-196 |
_version_ | 1782256505715687424 |
---|---|
author | Proudfoot, Judith G Jayawant, Amisha Whitton, Alexis E Parker, Gordon Manicavasagar, Vijaya Smith, Meg Nicholas, Jennifer |
author_facet | Proudfoot, Judith G Jayawant, Amisha Whitton, Alexis E Parker, Gordon Manicavasagar, Vijaya Smith, Meg Nicholas, Jennifer |
author_sort | Proudfoot, Judith G |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The increasing burden on mental health services has led to the growing use of peer support in psychological interventions. Four theoretical mechanisms have been proposed to underpin effective peer support: advice grounded in experiential knowledge, social support, social comparison and the helper therapy principle. However, there has been a lack of studies examining whether these mechanisms are also evident in clinical populations in which interpersonal dysfunction is common, such as bipolar disorder. METHOD: This qualitative study, conducted alongside a randomized controlled trial, examined whether the four mechanisms proposed to underpin effective peer support were expressed in the email exchange between 44 individuals newly-diagnosed with bipolar disorder and their Informed Supporters (n = 4), over the course of a supported online psychoeducation program for bipolar disorder. A total of 104 text segments were extracted and coded. The data were complemented by face-to-face interviews with three of the four Informed Supporters who participated in the study. RESULTS: Qualitative analyses of the email interchange and interview transcripts revealed rich examples of all four mechanisms. The data illustrated how the involvement of Informed Supporters resulted in numerous benefits for the newly-diagnosed individuals, including the provision of practical strategies for illness management as well as emotional support throughout the intervention. The Informed Supporters encouraged the development of positive relationships with mental health services, and acted as role models for treatment adherence. The Informed Supporters themselves reported gaining a number of benefits from helping, including a greater sense of connectedness with the mental health system, as well as a broader knowledge of illness management strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Examples of the mechanisms underpinning effective peer support were found in the sample of emails from individuals with newly-diagnosed bipolar disorder and their Informed Supporters. Experiential knowledge, social support, social comparison and helper therapy were apparent, even within a clinical population for whom relationship difficulties are common. Trial registration number ACTRN12608000411347. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3549948 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35499482013-01-24 Mechanisms underpinning effective peer support: a qualitative analysis of interactions between expert peers and patients newly-diagnosed with bipolar disorder Proudfoot, Judith G Jayawant, Amisha Whitton, Alexis E Parker, Gordon Manicavasagar, Vijaya Smith, Meg Nicholas, Jennifer BMC Psychiatry Research Article BACKGROUND: The increasing burden on mental health services has led to the growing use of peer support in psychological interventions. Four theoretical mechanisms have been proposed to underpin effective peer support: advice grounded in experiential knowledge, social support, social comparison and the helper therapy principle. However, there has been a lack of studies examining whether these mechanisms are also evident in clinical populations in which interpersonal dysfunction is common, such as bipolar disorder. METHOD: This qualitative study, conducted alongside a randomized controlled trial, examined whether the four mechanisms proposed to underpin effective peer support were expressed in the email exchange between 44 individuals newly-diagnosed with bipolar disorder and their Informed Supporters (n = 4), over the course of a supported online psychoeducation program for bipolar disorder. A total of 104 text segments were extracted and coded. The data were complemented by face-to-face interviews with three of the four Informed Supporters who participated in the study. RESULTS: Qualitative analyses of the email interchange and interview transcripts revealed rich examples of all four mechanisms. The data illustrated how the involvement of Informed Supporters resulted in numerous benefits for the newly-diagnosed individuals, including the provision of practical strategies for illness management as well as emotional support throughout the intervention. The Informed Supporters encouraged the development of positive relationships with mental health services, and acted as role models for treatment adherence. The Informed Supporters themselves reported gaining a number of benefits from helping, including a greater sense of connectedness with the mental health system, as well as a broader knowledge of illness management strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Examples of the mechanisms underpinning effective peer support were found in the sample of emails from individuals with newly-diagnosed bipolar disorder and their Informed Supporters. Experiential knowledge, social support, social comparison and helper therapy were apparent, even within a clinical population for whom relationship difficulties are common. Trial registration number ACTRN12608000411347. BioMed Central 2012-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3549948/ /pubmed/23140497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-12-196 Text en Copyright ©2012 Proudfoot et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Proudfoot, Judith G Jayawant, Amisha Whitton, Alexis E Parker, Gordon Manicavasagar, Vijaya Smith, Meg Nicholas, Jennifer Mechanisms underpinning effective peer support: a qualitative analysis of interactions between expert peers and patients newly-diagnosed with bipolar disorder |
title | Mechanisms underpinning effective peer support: a qualitative analysis of interactions between expert peers and patients newly-diagnosed with bipolar disorder |
title_full | Mechanisms underpinning effective peer support: a qualitative analysis of interactions between expert peers and patients newly-diagnosed with bipolar disorder |
title_fullStr | Mechanisms underpinning effective peer support: a qualitative analysis of interactions between expert peers and patients newly-diagnosed with bipolar disorder |
title_full_unstemmed | Mechanisms underpinning effective peer support: a qualitative analysis of interactions between expert peers and patients newly-diagnosed with bipolar disorder |
title_short | Mechanisms underpinning effective peer support: a qualitative analysis of interactions between expert peers and patients newly-diagnosed with bipolar disorder |
title_sort | mechanisms underpinning effective peer support: a qualitative analysis of interactions between expert peers and patients newly-diagnosed with bipolar disorder |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3549948/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23140497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-12-196 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT proudfootjudithg mechanismsunderpinningeffectivepeersupportaqualitativeanalysisofinteractionsbetweenexpertpeersandpatientsnewlydiagnosedwithbipolardisorder AT jayawantamisha mechanismsunderpinningeffectivepeersupportaqualitativeanalysisofinteractionsbetweenexpertpeersandpatientsnewlydiagnosedwithbipolardisorder AT whittonalexise mechanismsunderpinningeffectivepeersupportaqualitativeanalysisofinteractionsbetweenexpertpeersandpatientsnewlydiagnosedwithbipolardisorder AT parkergordon mechanismsunderpinningeffectivepeersupportaqualitativeanalysisofinteractionsbetweenexpertpeersandpatientsnewlydiagnosedwithbipolardisorder AT manicavasagarvijaya mechanismsunderpinningeffectivepeersupportaqualitativeanalysisofinteractionsbetweenexpertpeersandpatientsnewlydiagnosedwithbipolardisorder AT smithmeg mechanismsunderpinningeffectivepeersupportaqualitativeanalysisofinteractionsbetweenexpertpeersandpatientsnewlydiagnosedwithbipolardisorder AT nicholasjennifer mechanismsunderpinningeffectivepeersupportaqualitativeanalysisofinteractionsbetweenexpertpeersandpatientsnewlydiagnosedwithbipolardisorder |