Cargando…

Automatic stent strut detection in intravascular optical coherence tomographic pullback runs

We developed and evaluated an automatic stent strut detection method in intravascular optical coherence tomography (IVOCT) pullback runs. Providing very high resolution images, IVOCT has been rapidly accepted as a coronary imaging modality for the optimization of the stenting procedure and its follo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Ancong, Eggermont, Jeroen, Dekker, Niels, Garcia-Garcia, Hector M., Pawar, Ravindra, Reiber, Johan H. C., Dijkstra, Jouke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3550706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22618433
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-012-0064-y
_version_ 1782256529707106304
author Wang, Ancong
Eggermont, Jeroen
Dekker, Niels
Garcia-Garcia, Hector M.
Pawar, Ravindra
Reiber, Johan H. C.
Dijkstra, Jouke
author_facet Wang, Ancong
Eggermont, Jeroen
Dekker, Niels
Garcia-Garcia, Hector M.
Pawar, Ravindra
Reiber, Johan H. C.
Dijkstra, Jouke
author_sort Wang, Ancong
collection PubMed
description We developed and evaluated an automatic stent strut detection method in intravascular optical coherence tomography (IVOCT) pullback runs. Providing very high resolution images, IVOCT has been rapidly accepted as a coronary imaging modality for the optimization of the stenting procedure and its follow-up evaluation based on stent strut analysis. However, given the large number of struts visible in a pullback run, quantitative three-dimensional analysis is only feasible when the strut detection is performed automatically. The presented method first detects the candidate pixels using both a global intensity histogram and the intensity profile of each A-line. Gaussian smoothing is applied followed by specified Prewitt compass filters to detect the trailing shadow of each strut. Next, the candidate pixels are clustered using the shadow information. In the final step, several filters are applied to remove the false positives such as the guide wire. Our new method requires neither a priori knowledge of the strut status nor the lumen/vessel contours. In total, 10 IVOCT pullback runs from a 1-year follow-up study were used for validation purposes. 18,311 struts were divided into three strut status categories (malapposition, apposition or covered) and classified based on the image quality (high, medium or low). The inter-observer agreement is 95 %. The sensitivity was defined as the ratio of the number of true positives and the total number of struts in the expert defined result. The proposed approach demonstrated an average sensitivity of 94 %. For malapposed, apposed and covered stent struts, the sensitivity of the method is respectively 91, 93 and 94 %, which shows the robustness towards different situations. The presented method can detect struts automatically regardless of the strut status or the image quality, and thus can be used for quantitative measurement, 3D reconstruction and visualization of the stents in IVOCT pullback runs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3550706
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35507062013-01-22 Automatic stent strut detection in intravascular optical coherence tomographic pullback runs Wang, Ancong Eggermont, Jeroen Dekker, Niels Garcia-Garcia, Hector M. Pawar, Ravindra Reiber, Johan H. C. Dijkstra, Jouke Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Original Paper We developed and evaluated an automatic stent strut detection method in intravascular optical coherence tomography (IVOCT) pullback runs. Providing very high resolution images, IVOCT has been rapidly accepted as a coronary imaging modality for the optimization of the stenting procedure and its follow-up evaluation based on stent strut analysis. However, given the large number of struts visible in a pullback run, quantitative three-dimensional analysis is only feasible when the strut detection is performed automatically. The presented method first detects the candidate pixels using both a global intensity histogram and the intensity profile of each A-line. Gaussian smoothing is applied followed by specified Prewitt compass filters to detect the trailing shadow of each strut. Next, the candidate pixels are clustered using the shadow information. In the final step, several filters are applied to remove the false positives such as the guide wire. Our new method requires neither a priori knowledge of the strut status nor the lumen/vessel contours. In total, 10 IVOCT pullback runs from a 1-year follow-up study were used for validation purposes. 18,311 struts were divided into three strut status categories (malapposition, apposition or covered) and classified based on the image quality (high, medium or low). The inter-observer agreement is 95 %. The sensitivity was defined as the ratio of the number of true positives and the total number of struts in the expert defined result. The proposed approach demonstrated an average sensitivity of 94 %. For malapposed, apposed and covered stent struts, the sensitivity of the method is respectively 91, 93 and 94 %, which shows the robustness towards different situations. The presented method can detect struts automatically regardless of the strut status or the image quality, and thus can be used for quantitative measurement, 3D reconstruction and visualization of the stents in IVOCT pullback runs. Springer Netherlands 2012-05-23 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3550706/ /pubmed/22618433 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-012-0064-y Text en © The Author(s) 2012 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Wang, Ancong
Eggermont, Jeroen
Dekker, Niels
Garcia-Garcia, Hector M.
Pawar, Ravindra
Reiber, Johan H. C.
Dijkstra, Jouke
Automatic stent strut detection in intravascular optical coherence tomographic pullback runs
title Automatic stent strut detection in intravascular optical coherence tomographic pullback runs
title_full Automatic stent strut detection in intravascular optical coherence tomographic pullback runs
title_fullStr Automatic stent strut detection in intravascular optical coherence tomographic pullback runs
title_full_unstemmed Automatic stent strut detection in intravascular optical coherence tomographic pullback runs
title_short Automatic stent strut detection in intravascular optical coherence tomographic pullback runs
title_sort automatic stent strut detection in intravascular optical coherence tomographic pullback runs
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3550706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22618433
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-012-0064-y
work_keys_str_mv AT wangancong automaticstentstrutdetectioninintravascularopticalcoherencetomographicpullbackruns
AT eggermontjeroen automaticstentstrutdetectioninintravascularopticalcoherencetomographicpullbackruns
AT dekkerniels automaticstentstrutdetectioninintravascularopticalcoherencetomographicpullbackruns
AT garciagarciahectorm automaticstentstrutdetectioninintravascularopticalcoherencetomographicpullbackruns
AT pawarravindra automaticstentstrutdetectioninintravascularopticalcoherencetomographicpullbackruns
AT reiberjohanhc automaticstentstrutdetectioninintravascularopticalcoherencetomographicpullbackruns
AT dijkstrajouke automaticstentstrutdetectioninintravascularopticalcoherencetomographicpullbackruns