Cargando…

Anterior segment biometry using ultrasound biomicroscopy and the Artemis-2 very high frequency ultrasound scanner

PURPOSE: To compare the precision of anterior chamber angle (ACA) and anterior chamber depth (ACD) measurements taken with ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) and the Artemis-2 Very High Frequency Ultrasound Scanner (VHFUS) in normal subjects. DESIGN: Prospective study. METHODS: We randomly selected one...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Al-Farhan, Haya M, AlMutairi, Reem N
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3551458/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23345968
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S39463
_version_ 1782256563470204928
author Al-Farhan, Haya M
AlMutairi, Reem N
author_facet Al-Farhan, Haya M
AlMutairi, Reem N
author_sort Al-Farhan, Haya M
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare the precision of anterior chamber angle (ACA) and anterior chamber depth (ACD) measurements taken with ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) and the Artemis-2 Very High Frequency Ultrasound Scanner (VHFUS) in normal subjects. DESIGN: Prospective study. METHODS: We randomly selected one eye from each of 59 normal subjects in this study. Two subjects dropped out of the study; the associated data were excluded from analysis. ACA and ACD measurements were obtained using the VHFUS and the UBM. The results were compared statistically using repeated-measures analysis of variance for the intraobserver repeatability, unpaired t-test, and limits of agreement. RESULTS: The average ACA values for the UBM and the VHFUS (±standard deviation) were 41.83° ± 5.03° and 33.36° ± 6.03°, respectively. The average ACD values were 2.96 ± 0.34 mm and 2.87 ± 0.31 mm. The intraobserver repeatability analysis of variance P-values for ACA and ACD measurements using UBM were 0.10 and 0.68, respectively; for the Artemis-2 VHFUS, the respective values were 0.68 and 0.09. The difference in ACA measurements was statistically significant (t = 8.41; P < 0.0001), while the difference in ACD values was not (t = 1.51; P < 0.13). The mean ACA difference was 8.50° ± 2.50°, and the limits of agreement were +13.30° to −3.60°. The mean ACD difference was 0.09 ± 0.27 mm, and the limits of agreement ranged from 0.61 mm to −0.43 mm. The mean difference percentage of ACD was 3.1% for both instruments. CONCLUSION: In case of the ACD, both instruments can be used interchangeably; however, with the ACA instruments, they cannot be used interchangeably.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3551458
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35514582013-01-23 Anterior segment biometry using ultrasound biomicroscopy and the Artemis-2 very high frequency ultrasound scanner Al-Farhan, Haya M AlMutairi, Reem N Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: To compare the precision of anterior chamber angle (ACA) and anterior chamber depth (ACD) measurements taken with ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) and the Artemis-2 Very High Frequency Ultrasound Scanner (VHFUS) in normal subjects. DESIGN: Prospective study. METHODS: We randomly selected one eye from each of 59 normal subjects in this study. Two subjects dropped out of the study; the associated data were excluded from analysis. ACA and ACD measurements were obtained using the VHFUS and the UBM. The results were compared statistically using repeated-measures analysis of variance for the intraobserver repeatability, unpaired t-test, and limits of agreement. RESULTS: The average ACA values for the UBM and the VHFUS (±standard deviation) were 41.83° ± 5.03° and 33.36° ± 6.03°, respectively. The average ACD values were 2.96 ± 0.34 mm and 2.87 ± 0.31 mm. The intraobserver repeatability analysis of variance P-values for ACA and ACD measurements using UBM were 0.10 and 0.68, respectively; for the Artemis-2 VHFUS, the respective values were 0.68 and 0.09. The difference in ACA measurements was statistically significant (t = 8.41; P < 0.0001), while the difference in ACD values was not (t = 1.51; P < 0.13). The mean ACA difference was 8.50° ± 2.50°, and the limits of agreement were +13.30° to −3.60°. The mean ACD difference was 0.09 ± 0.27 mm, and the limits of agreement ranged from 0.61 mm to −0.43 mm. The mean difference percentage of ACD was 3.1% for both instruments. CONCLUSION: In case of the ACD, both instruments can be used interchangeably; however, with the ACA instruments, they cannot be used interchangeably. Dove Medical Press 2013 2013-01-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3551458/ /pubmed/23345968 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S39463 Text en © 2013 Al-Farhan and AlMutairi, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Al-Farhan, Haya M
AlMutairi, Reem N
Anterior segment biometry using ultrasound biomicroscopy and the Artemis-2 very high frequency ultrasound scanner
title Anterior segment biometry using ultrasound biomicroscopy and the Artemis-2 very high frequency ultrasound scanner
title_full Anterior segment biometry using ultrasound biomicroscopy and the Artemis-2 very high frequency ultrasound scanner
title_fullStr Anterior segment biometry using ultrasound biomicroscopy and the Artemis-2 very high frequency ultrasound scanner
title_full_unstemmed Anterior segment biometry using ultrasound biomicroscopy and the Artemis-2 very high frequency ultrasound scanner
title_short Anterior segment biometry using ultrasound biomicroscopy and the Artemis-2 very high frequency ultrasound scanner
title_sort anterior segment biometry using ultrasound biomicroscopy and the artemis-2 very high frequency ultrasound scanner
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3551458/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23345968
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S39463
work_keys_str_mv AT alfarhanhayam anteriorsegmentbiometryusingultrasoundbiomicroscopyandtheartemis2veryhighfrequencyultrasoundscanner
AT almutairireemn anteriorsegmentbiometryusingultrasoundbiomicroscopyandtheartemis2veryhighfrequencyultrasoundscanner