Cargando…

Suboccipital craniotomy for Chiari I results in evoked potential conduction changes

BACKGROUND: Management of Chiari I is controversial, in part because there is no widely used quantitative measurement of decompression. It has been demonstrated that brainstem auditory evoked responses (BAER) and somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) have decreased conduction latencies after wide c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Jason A., Coutin-Churchman, Pedro E., Nuwer, Marc R., Lazareff, Jorge A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3551514/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23372981
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.105277
_version_ 1782256571380662272
author Chen, Jason A.
Coutin-Churchman, Pedro E.
Nuwer, Marc R.
Lazareff, Jorge A.
author_facet Chen, Jason A.
Coutin-Churchman, Pedro E.
Nuwer, Marc R.
Lazareff, Jorge A.
author_sort Chen, Jason A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Management of Chiari I is controversial, in part because there is no widely used quantitative measurement of decompression. It has been demonstrated that brainstem auditory evoked responses (BAER) and somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) have decreased conduction latencies after wide craniectomy. We analyzed these parameters in a suboccipital craniectomy/craniotomy procedure. METHODS: Thirteen consecutive patients underwent suboccipital decompression for treatment of symptomatic Chiari I. Craniectomy was restricted to the inferior aspect of the nuchal line, and in most cases the bone flap was replaced. Neuronal conduction was monitored continuously with median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials (M-SEP), posterior tibial nerve somatosensory evoked potentials (T-SEP), BAER, or a combination. The M-SEP N20, T-SEP P37, and BAER V latencies were recorded at four milestones – preoperatively, following craniotomy, following durotomy, and following closure. RESULTS: Five males and eight females, with average age of 9 years, were studied. Clinical improvement was noted in all 13 patients. M-SEP N20 latency decreased from a mean of 18.55 at baseline to 17.75 ms after craniotomy (P = 0.01); to 17.06 ms after durotomy (P = 0.01); and to 16.68 ms after closing (P = 0.02). T-SEP P37 latency did not change significantly. BAER V latency decreased from a mean of 6.25 ms at baseline to 6.14 ms after craniotomy (P = 0.04); to 5.98 ms after durotomy (P = 0.01); and to 5.95 ms after closing (P = 0.45). CONCLUSION: Significant improvements in conduction followed both craniectomy and durotomy. Bone replacement did not affect these results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3551514
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35515142013-01-31 Suboccipital craniotomy for Chiari I results in evoked potential conduction changes Chen, Jason A. Coutin-Churchman, Pedro E. Nuwer, Marc R. Lazareff, Jorge A. Surg Neurol Int Original Article BACKGROUND: Management of Chiari I is controversial, in part because there is no widely used quantitative measurement of decompression. It has been demonstrated that brainstem auditory evoked responses (BAER) and somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) have decreased conduction latencies after wide craniectomy. We analyzed these parameters in a suboccipital craniectomy/craniotomy procedure. METHODS: Thirteen consecutive patients underwent suboccipital decompression for treatment of symptomatic Chiari I. Craniectomy was restricted to the inferior aspect of the nuchal line, and in most cases the bone flap was replaced. Neuronal conduction was monitored continuously with median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials (M-SEP), posterior tibial nerve somatosensory evoked potentials (T-SEP), BAER, or a combination. The M-SEP N20, T-SEP P37, and BAER V latencies were recorded at four milestones – preoperatively, following craniotomy, following durotomy, and following closure. RESULTS: Five males and eight females, with average age of 9 years, were studied. Clinical improvement was noted in all 13 patients. M-SEP N20 latency decreased from a mean of 18.55 at baseline to 17.75 ms after craniotomy (P = 0.01); to 17.06 ms after durotomy (P = 0.01); and to 16.68 ms after closing (P = 0.02). T-SEP P37 latency did not change significantly. BAER V latency decreased from a mean of 6.25 ms at baseline to 6.14 ms after craniotomy (P = 0.04); to 5.98 ms after durotomy (P = 0.01); and to 5.95 ms after closing (P = 0.45). CONCLUSION: Significant improvements in conduction followed both craniectomy and durotomy. Bone replacement did not affect these results. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3551514/ /pubmed/23372981 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.105277 Text en Copyright: © 2012 Chen JA http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Chen, Jason A.
Coutin-Churchman, Pedro E.
Nuwer, Marc R.
Lazareff, Jorge A.
Suboccipital craniotomy for Chiari I results in evoked potential conduction changes
title Suboccipital craniotomy for Chiari I results in evoked potential conduction changes
title_full Suboccipital craniotomy for Chiari I results in evoked potential conduction changes
title_fullStr Suboccipital craniotomy for Chiari I results in evoked potential conduction changes
title_full_unstemmed Suboccipital craniotomy for Chiari I results in evoked potential conduction changes
title_short Suboccipital craniotomy for Chiari I results in evoked potential conduction changes
title_sort suboccipital craniotomy for chiari i results in evoked potential conduction changes
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3551514/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23372981
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.105277
work_keys_str_mv AT chenjasona suboccipitalcraniotomyforchiariiresultsinevokedpotentialconductionchanges
AT coutinchurchmanpedroe suboccipitalcraniotomyforchiariiresultsinevokedpotentialconductionchanges
AT nuwermarcr suboccipitalcraniotomyforchiariiresultsinevokedpotentialconductionchanges
AT lazareffjorgea suboccipitalcraniotomyforchiariiresultsinevokedpotentialconductionchanges