Cargando…

Reference values for generic instruments used in routine outcome monitoring: the leiden routine outcome monitoring study

INTRODUCTION: The Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI), Mood & Anxiety Symptom Questionnaire −30 (MASQ-D30), Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36), and Dimensional Assessment of Personality Pathology-Short Form (DAPP-SF) are generic instruments that can be used in Routine Outcome Monitoring (ROM) of pati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schulte-van Maaren, Yvonne WM, Carlier, Ingrid VE, Zitman, Frans G, van Hemert, Albert M, de Waal, Margot WM, van Noorden, Martijn S, Giltay, Erik J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3551660/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23171272
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-12-203
_version_ 1782256585782853632
author Schulte-van Maaren, Yvonne WM
Carlier, Ingrid VE
Zitman, Frans G
van Hemert, Albert M
de Waal, Margot WM
van Noorden, Martijn S
Giltay, Erik J
author_facet Schulte-van Maaren, Yvonne WM
Carlier, Ingrid VE
Zitman, Frans G
van Hemert, Albert M
de Waal, Margot WM
van Noorden, Martijn S
Giltay, Erik J
author_sort Schulte-van Maaren, Yvonne WM
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI), Mood & Anxiety Symptom Questionnaire −30 (MASQ-D30), Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36), and Dimensional Assessment of Personality Pathology-Short Form (DAPP-SF) are generic instruments that can be used in Routine Outcome Monitoring (ROM) of patients with common mental disorders. We aimed to generate reference values usually encountered in 'healthy' and ‘psychiatrically ill’ populations to facilitate correct interpretation of ROM results. METHODS: We included the following specific reference populations: 1294 subjects from the general population (ROM reference group) recruited through general practitioners, and 5269 psychiatric outpatients diagnosed with mood, anxiety, or somatoform (MAS) disorders (ROM patient group). The outermost 5% of observations were used to define limits for one-sided reference intervals (95(th) percentiles for BSI, MASQ-D30 and DAPP-SF, and 5(th) percentiles for SF-36 subscales). Internal consistency and Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) analyses were performed. RESULTS: Mean age for the ROM reference group was 40.3 years (SD=12.6) and 37.7 years (SD=12.0) for the ROM patient group. The proportion of females was 62.8% and 64.6%, respectively. The mean for cut-off values of healthy individuals was 0.82 for the BSI subscales, 23 for the three MASQ-D30 subscales, 45 for the SF-36 subscales, and 3.1 for the DAPP-SF subscales. Discriminative power of the BSI, MASQ-D30 and SF-36 was good, but it was poor for the DAPP-SF. For all instruments, the internal consistency of the subscales ranged from adequate to excellent. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Reference values for the clinical interpretation were provided for the BSI, MASQ-D30, SF-36, and DAPP-SF. Clinical information aided by ROM data may represent the best means to appraise the clinical state of psychiatric outpatients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3551660
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35516602013-01-24 Reference values for generic instruments used in routine outcome monitoring: the leiden routine outcome monitoring study Schulte-van Maaren, Yvonne WM Carlier, Ingrid VE Zitman, Frans G van Hemert, Albert M de Waal, Margot WM van Noorden, Martijn S Giltay, Erik J BMC Psychiatry Research Article INTRODUCTION: The Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI), Mood & Anxiety Symptom Questionnaire −30 (MASQ-D30), Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36), and Dimensional Assessment of Personality Pathology-Short Form (DAPP-SF) are generic instruments that can be used in Routine Outcome Monitoring (ROM) of patients with common mental disorders. We aimed to generate reference values usually encountered in 'healthy' and ‘psychiatrically ill’ populations to facilitate correct interpretation of ROM results. METHODS: We included the following specific reference populations: 1294 subjects from the general population (ROM reference group) recruited through general practitioners, and 5269 psychiatric outpatients diagnosed with mood, anxiety, or somatoform (MAS) disorders (ROM patient group). The outermost 5% of observations were used to define limits for one-sided reference intervals (95(th) percentiles for BSI, MASQ-D30 and DAPP-SF, and 5(th) percentiles for SF-36 subscales). Internal consistency and Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) analyses were performed. RESULTS: Mean age for the ROM reference group was 40.3 years (SD=12.6) and 37.7 years (SD=12.0) for the ROM patient group. The proportion of females was 62.8% and 64.6%, respectively. The mean for cut-off values of healthy individuals was 0.82 for the BSI subscales, 23 for the three MASQ-D30 subscales, 45 for the SF-36 subscales, and 3.1 for the DAPP-SF subscales. Discriminative power of the BSI, MASQ-D30 and SF-36 was good, but it was poor for the DAPP-SF. For all instruments, the internal consistency of the subscales ranged from adequate to excellent. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Reference values for the clinical interpretation were provided for the BSI, MASQ-D30, SF-36, and DAPP-SF. Clinical information aided by ROM data may represent the best means to appraise the clinical state of psychiatric outpatients. BioMed Central 2012-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3551660/ /pubmed/23171272 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-12-203 Text en Copyright ©2012 Schulte-van Maaren et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Schulte-van Maaren, Yvonne WM
Carlier, Ingrid VE
Zitman, Frans G
van Hemert, Albert M
de Waal, Margot WM
van Noorden, Martijn S
Giltay, Erik J
Reference values for generic instruments used in routine outcome monitoring: the leiden routine outcome monitoring study
title Reference values for generic instruments used in routine outcome monitoring: the leiden routine outcome monitoring study
title_full Reference values for generic instruments used in routine outcome monitoring: the leiden routine outcome monitoring study
title_fullStr Reference values for generic instruments used in routine outcome monitoring: the leiden routine outcome monitoring study
title_full_unstemmed Reference values for generic instruments used in routine outcome monitoring: the leiden routine outcome monitoring study
title_short Reference values for generic instruments used in routine outcome monitoring: the leiden routine outcome monitoring study
title_sort reference values for generic instruments used in routine outcome monitoring: the leiden routine outcome monitoring study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3551660/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23171272
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-12-203
work_keys_str_mv AT schultevanmaarenyvonnewm referencevaluesforgenericinstrumentsusedinroutineoutcomemonitoringtheleidenroutineoutcomemonitoringstudy
AT carlieringridve referencevaluesforgenericinstrumentsusedinroutineoutcomemonitoringtheleidenroutineoutcomemonitoringstudy
AT zitmanfransg referencevaluesforgenericinstrumentsusedinroutineoutcomemonitoringtheleidenroutineoutcomemonitoringstudy
AT vanhemertalbertm referencevaluesforgenericinstrumentsusedinroutineoutcomemonitoringtheleidenroutineoutcomemonitoringstudy
AT dewaalmargotwm referencevaluesforgenericinstrumentsusedinroutineoutcomemonitoringtheleidenroutineoutcomemonitoringstudy
AT vannoordenmartijns referencevaluesforgenericinstrumentsusedinroutineoutcomemonitoringtheleidenroutineoutcomemonitoringstudy
AT giltayerikj referencevaluesforgenericinstrumentsusedinroutineoutcomemonitoringtheleidenroutineoutcomemonitoringstudy