Cargando…
Reference values for generic instruments used in routine outcome monitoring: the leiden routine outcome monitoring study
INTRODUCTION: The Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI), Mood & Anxiety Symptom Questionnaire −30 (MASQ-D30), Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36), and Dimensional Assessment of Personality Pathology-Short Form (DAPP-SF) are generic instruments that can be used in Routine Outcome Monitoring (ROM) of pati...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3551660/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23171272 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-12-203 |
_version_ | 1782256585782853632 |
---|---|
author | Schulte-van Maaren, Yvonne WM Carlier, Ingrid VE Zitman, Frans G van Hemert, Albert M de Waal, Margot WM van Noorden, Martijn S Giltay, Erik J |
author_facet | Schulte-van Maaren, Yvonne WM Carlier, Ingrid VE Zitman, Frans G van Hemert, Albert M de Waal, Margot WM van Noorden, Martijn S Giltay, Erik J |
author_sort | Schulte-van Maaren, Yvonne WM |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI), Mood & Anxiety Symptom Questionnaire −30 (MASQ-D30), Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36), and Dimensional Assessment of Personality Pathology-Short Form (DAPP-SF) are generic instruments that can be used in Routine Outcome Monitoring (ROM) of patients with common mental disorders. We aimed to generate reference values usually encountered in 'healthy' and ‘psychiatrically ill’ populations to facilitate correct interpretation of ROM results. METHODS: We included the following specific reference populations: 1294 subjects from the general population (ROM reference group) recruited through general practitioners, and 5269 psychiatric outpatients diagnosed with mood, anxiety, or somatoform (MAS) disorders (ROM patient group). The outermost 5% of observations were used to define limits for one-sided reference intervals (95(th) percentiles for BSI, MASQ-D30 and DAPP-SF, and 5(th) percentiles for SF-36 subscales). Internal consistency and Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) analyses were performed. RESULTS: Mean age for the ROM reference group was 40.3 years (SD=12.6) and 37.7 years (SD=12.0) for the ROM patient group. The proportion of females was 62.8% and 64.6%, respectively. The mean for cut-off values of healthy individuals was 0.82 for the BSI subscales, 23 for the three MASQ-D30 subscales, 45 for the SF-36 subscales, and 3.1 for the DAPP-SF subscales. Discriminative power of the BSI, MASQ-D30 and SF-36 was good, but it was poor for the DAPP-SF. For all instruments, the internal consistency of the subscales ranged from adequate to excellent. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Reference values for the clinical interpretation were provided for the BSI, MASQ-D30, SF-36, and DAPP-SF. Clinical information aided by ROM data may represent the best means to appraise the clinical state of psychiatric outpatients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3551660 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35516602013-01-24 Reference values for generic instruments used in routine outcome monitoring: the leiden routine outcome monitoring study Schulte-van Maaren, Yvonne WM Carlier, Ingrid VE Zitman, Frans G van Hemert, Albert M de Waal, Margot WM van Noorden, Martijn S Giltay, Erik J BMC Psychiatry Research Article INTRODUCTION: The Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI), Mood & Anxiety Symptom Questionnaire −30 (MASQ-D30), Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36), and Dimensional Assessment of Personality Pathology-Short Form (DAPP-SF) are generic instruments that can be used in Routine Outcome Monitoring (ROM) of patients with common mental disorders. We aimed to generate reference values usually encountered in 'healthy' and ‘psychiatrically ill’ populations to facilitate correct interpretation of ROM results. METHODS: We included the following specific reference populations: 1294 subjects from the general population (ROM reference group) recruited through general practitioners, and 5269 psychiatric outpatients diagnosed with mood, anxiety, or somatoform (MAS) disorders (ROM patient group). The outermost 5% of observations were used to define limits for one-sided reference intervals (95(th) percentiles for BSI, MASQ-D30 and DAPP-SF, and 5(th) percentiles for SF-36 subscales). Internal consistency and Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) analyses were performed. RESULTS: Mean age for the ROM reference group was 40.3 years (SD=12.6) and 37.7 years (SD=12.0) for the ROM patient group. The proportion of females was 62.8% and 64.6%, respectively. The mean for cut-off values of healthy individuals was 0.82 for the BSI subscales, 23 for the three MASQ-D30 subscales, 45 for the SF-36 subscales, and 3.1 for the DAPP-SF subscales. Discriminative power of the BSI, MASQ-D30 and SF-36 was good, but it was poor for the DAPP-SF. For all instruments, the internal consistency of the subscales ranged from adequate to excellent. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Reference values for the clinical interpretation were provided for the BSI, MASQ-D30, SF-36, and DAPP-SF. Clinical information aided by ROM data may represent the best means to appraise the clinical state of psychiatric outpatients. BioMed Central 2012-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3551660/ /pubmed/23171272 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-12-203 Text en Copyright ©2012 Schulte-van Maaren et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Schulte-van Maaren, Yvonne WM Carlier, Ingrid VE Zitman, Frans G van Hemert, Albert M de Waal, Margot WM van Noorden, Martijn S Giltay, Erik J Reference values for generic instruments used in routine outcome monitoring: the leiden routine outcome monitoring study |
title | Reference values for generic instruments used in routine outcome monitoring: the leiden routine outcome monitoring study |
title_full | Reference values for generic instruments used in routine outcome monitoring: the leiden routine outcome monitoring study |
title_fullStr | Reference values for generic instruments used in routine outcome monitoring: the leiden routine outcome monitoring study |
title_full_unstemmed | Reference values for generic instruments used in routine outcome monitoring: the leiden routine outcome monitoring study |
title_short | Reference values for generic instruments used in routine outcome monitoring: the leiden routine outcome monitoring study |
title_sort | reference values for generic instruments used in routine outcome monitoring: the leiden routine outcome monitoring study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3551660/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23171272 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-12-203 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schultevanmaarenyvonnewm referencevaluesforgenericinstrumentsusedinroutineoutcomemonitoringtheleidenroutineoutcomemonitoringstudy AT carlieringridve referencevaluesforgenericinstrumentsusedinroutineoutcomemonitoringtheleidenroutineoutcomemonitoringstudy AT zitmanfransg referencevaluesforgenericinstrumentsusedinroutineoutcomemonitoringtheleidenroutineoutcomemonitoringstudy AT vanhemertalbertm referencevaluesforgenericinstrumentsusedinroutineoutcomemonitoringtheleidenroutineoutcomemonitoringstudy AT dewaalmargotwm referencevaluesforgenericinstrumentsusedinroutineoutcomemonitoringtheleidenroutineoutcomemonitoringstudy AT vannoordenmartijns referencevaluesforgenericinstrumentsusedinroutineoutcomemonitoringtheleidenroutineoutcomemonitoringstudy AT giltayerikj referencevaluesforgenericinstrumentsusedinroutineoutcomemonitoringtheleidenroutineoutcomemonitoringstudy |