Cargando…

Replacement of endoprosthetic implants within a two years follow-up period: a statutory health insurance routine data analysis

BACKGROUND: The statutory health insurance system embodies a large amount of data on the treatments of their members. Depending on joint, prosthesis type, patient activity and comorbidity, knee and hip replacements can last up to 20 years. Based on statutory health insurance data the main object of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Linder, Roland, Müller, Hardy, Grenz-Farenholtz, Brigitte, Wagner, Caroline, Stockheim, Martin, Verheyen, Frank
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3551674/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23157842
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-13-223
_version_ 1782256589097402368
author Linder, Roland
Müller, Hardy
Grenz-Farenholtz, Brigitte
Wagner, Caroline
Stockheim, Martin
Verheyen, Frank
author_facet Linder, Roland
Müller, Hardy
Grenz-Farenholtz, Brigitte
Wagner, Caroline
Stockheim, Martin
Verheyen, Frank
author_sort Linder, Roland
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The statutory health insurance system embodies a large amount of data on the treatments of their members. Depending on joint, prosthesis type, patient activity and comorbidity, knee and hip replacements can last up to 20 years. Based on statutory health insurance data the main object of this analysis was to investigate how high the early revision rate of replacements actually is. METHODS: The number of replacements in the years 2005 and 2006 has been extracted from the TK database for hip (OPS-Code 5-820, n = 20,875), knee (OPS 5-822, n = 13,466), upper limbs (OPS 5-824, n = 901), and lower limbs (OPS 5-826) replacements. This data has then been related to each consecutive operation (i. e. change or excision of joint endoprosthesis) over a joint-specific observation period of two years. RESULTS: In 3.7% of the cases joint replacements stood for less than 2 years (hip 3.5%, knee 3.8%, upper limbs 6.5%, and lower limbs 5.5%). There is a significantly positive correlation between the treatment data of the hospitals and the outcome as to low rates of reoperations at early stages. The main reason for short lifetime (76 - 81%) is mechanical failure. CONCLUSION: The percentage of joint endoprostheses with significantly short lifetimes has been unexpectedly high. The de facto lifetimes of joint endoprostheses thus often do not match the manufacturers’ information. The authors strongly support the idea of a national endoprosthesis register as such a register could give detailed information on firstly whether these deficits are due to material defects, osteolysis or dislocation and secondly which products are mainly affected.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3551674
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35516742013-01-24 Replacement of endoprosthetic implants within a two years follow-up period: a statutory health insurance routine data analysis Linder, Roland Müller, Hardy Grenz-Farenholtz, Brigitte Wagner, Caroline Stockheim, Martin Verheyen, Frank BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: The statutory health insurance system embodies a large amount of data on the treatments of their members. Depending on joint, prosthesis type, patient activity and comorbidity, knee and hip replacements can last up to 20 years. Based on statutory health insurance data the main object of this analysis was to investigate how high the early revision rate of replacements actually is. METHODS: The number of replacements in the years 2005 and 2006 has been extracted from the TK database for hip (OPS-Code 5-820, n = 20,875), knee (OPS 5-822, n = 13,466), upper limbs (OPS 5-824, n = 901), and lower limbs (OPS 5-826) replacements. This data has then been related to each consecutive operation (i. e. change or excision of joint endoprosthesis) over a joint-specific observation period of two years. RESULTS: In 3.7% of the cases joint replacements stood for less than 2 years (hip 3.5%, knee 3.8%, upper limbs 6.5%, and lower limbs 5.5%). There is a significantly positive correlation between the treatment data of the hospitals and the outcome as to low rates of reoperations at early stages. The main reason for short lifetime (76 - 81%) is mechanical failure. CONCLUSION: The percentage of joint endoprostheses with significantly short lifetimes has been unexpectedly high. The de facto lifetimes of joint endoprostheses thus often do not match the manufacturers’ information. The authors strongly support the idea of a national endoprosthesis register as such a register could give detailed information on firstly whether these deficits are due to material defects, osteolysis or dislocation and secondly which products are mainly affected. BioMed Central 2012-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3551674/ /pubmed/23157842 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-13-223 Text en Copyright ©2012 Linder et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Linder, Roland
Müller, Hardy
Grenz-Farenholtz, Brigitte
Wagner, Caroline
Stockheim, Martin
Verheyen, Frank
Replacement of endoprosthetic implants within a two years follow-up period: a statutory health insurance routine data analysis
title Replacement of endoprosthetic implants within a two years follow-up period: a statutory health insurance routine data analysis
title_full Replacement of endoprosthetic implants within a two years follow-up period: a statutory health insurance routine data analysis
title_fullStr Replacement of endoprosthetic implants within a two years follow-up period: a statutory health insurance routine data analysis
title_full_unstemmed Replacement of endoprosthetic implants within a two years follow-up period: a statutory health insurance routine data analysis
title_short Replacement of endoprosthetic implants within a two years follow-up period: a statutory health insurance routine data analysis
title_sort replacement of endoprosthetic implants within a two years follow-up period: a statutory health insurance routine data analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3551674/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23157842
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-13-223
work_keys_str_mv AT linderroland replacementofendoprostheticimplantswithinatwoyearsfollowupperiodastatutoryhealthinsuranceroutinedataanalysis
AT mullerhardy replacementofendoprostheticimplantswithinatwoyearsfollowupperiodastatutoryhealthinsuranceroutinedataanalysis
AT grenzfarenholtzbrigitte replacementofendoprostheticimplantswithinatwoyearsfollowupperiodastatutoryhealthinsuranceroutinedataanalysis
AT wagnercaroline replacementofendoprostheticimplantswithinatwoyearsfollowupperiodastatutoryhealthinsuranceroutinedataanalysis
AT stockheimmartin replacementofendoprostheticimplantswithinatwoyearsfollowupperiodastatutoryhealthinsuranceroutinedataanalysis
AT verheyenfrank replacementofendoprostheticimplantswithinatwoyearsfollowupperiodastatutoryhealthinsuranceroutinedataanalysis