Cargando…
Working at the nexus between public health policy, practice and research. Dynamics of knowledge sharing in the Netherlands
BACKGROUND: Joining the domains of practice, research and policy is an important aspect of boosting the quality performance required to tackle complex public health problems. “Joining domains” implies a departure from the linear and technocratic knowledge-translation approach. Integrating the practi...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3551703/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23075375 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-10-33 |
_version_ | 1782256596038975488 |
---|---|
author | Jansen, Maria W De Leeuw, Evelyne Hoeijmakers, Marjan De Vries, Nanne K |
author_facet | Jansen, Maria W De Leeuw, Evelyne Hoeijmakers, Marjan De Vries, Nanne K |
author_sort | Jansen, Maria W |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Joining the domains of practice, research and policy is an important aspect of boosting the quality performance required to tackle complex public health problems. “Joining domains” implies a departure from the linear and technocratic knowledge-translation approach. Integrating the practice, research and policy triangle means knowing its elements, appreciating the barriers, identifying possible cooperation strategies and studying strategy effectiveness under specified conditions. This article examines the dynamic process of developing an Academic Collaborative Centre for Public Health in the Netherlands, with the objective of achieving that the three domains of policy, practice and research become working partners on an equal footing. METHOD: An interpretative hermeneutic approach was used to interpret the phenomenon of collaboration at the nexus between the three domains. The project was explicitly grounded in current organizational culture and routines, applied to nexus action. In the process of examination, we used both quantitative (e.g. records) and qualitative data (e.g., interviews and observations). The data were interpreted using the Actor-Network, Institutional Re-Design and Blurring the Boundaries theories. RESULTS: Results show commitment at strategic level. At the tactical level, however, managers were inclined to prioritize daily routine, while the policy domain remained absent. At the operational level, practitioners learned to do PhD research in real-life practice and researchers became acquainted with problems of practice and policy, resulting in new research initiatives. CONCLUSION: We conclude that working at the nexus is an ongoing process of formation and reformation. Strategies based on Institutional Re-Design theories in particular might help to more actively stimulate managers’ involvement to establish mutually supportive networks. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3551703 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35517032013-01-24 Working at the nexus between public health policy, practice and research. Dynamics of knowledge sharing in the Netherlands Jansen, Maria W De Leeuw, Evelyne Hoeijmakers, Marjan De Vries, Nanne K Health Res Policy Syst Research BACKGROUND: Joining the domains of practice, research and policy is an important aspect of boosting the quality performance required to tackle complex public health problems. “Joining domains” implies a departure from the linear and technocratic knowledge-translation approach. Integrating the practice, research and policy triangle means knowing its elements, appreciating the barriers, identifying possible cooperation strategies and studying strategy effectiveness under specified conditions. This article examines the dynamic process of developing an Academic Collaborative Centre for Public Health in the Netherlands, with the objective of achieving that the three domains of policy, practice and research become working partners on an equal footing. METHOD: An interpretative hermeneutic approach was used to interpret the phenomenon of collaboration at the nexus between the three domains. The project was explicitly grounded in current organizational culture and routines, applied to nexus action. In the process of examination, we used both quantitative (e.g. records) and qualitative data (e.g., interviews and observations). The data were interpreted using the Actor-Network, Institutional Re-Design and Blurring the Boundaries theories. RESULTS: Results show commitment at strategic level. At the tactical level, however, managers were inclined to prioritize daily routine, while the policy domain remained absent. At the operational level, practitioners learned to do PhD research in real-life practice and researchers became acquainted with problems of practice and policy, resulting in new research initiatives. CONCLUSION: We conclude that working at the nexus is an ongoing process of formation and reformation. Strategies based on Institutional Re-Design theories in particular might help to more actively stimulate managers’ involvement to establish mutually supportive networks. BioMed Central 2012-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3551703/ /pubmed/23075375 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-10-33 Text en Copyright ©2012 Jansen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Jansen, Maria W De Leeuw, Evelyne Hoeijmakers, Marjan De Vries, Nanne K Working at the nexus between public health policy, practice and research. Dynamics of knowledge sharing in the Netherlands |
title | Working at the nexus between public health policy, practice and research. Dynamics of knowledge sharing in the Netherlands |
title_full | Working at the nexus between public health policy, practice and research. Dynamics of knowledge sharing in the Netherlands |
title_fullStr | Working at the nexus between public health policy, practice and research. Dynamics of knowledge sharing in the Netherlands |
title_full_unstemmed | Working at the nexus between public health policy, practice and research. Dynamics of knowledge sharing in the Netherlands |
title_short | Working at the nexus between public health policy, practice and research. Dynamics of knowledge sharing in the Netherlands |
title_sort | working at the nexus between public health policy, practice and research. dynamics of knowledge sharing in the netherlands |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3551703/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23075375 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-10-33 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jansenmariaw workingatthenexusbetweenpublichealthpolicypracticeandresearchdynamicsofknowledgesharinginthenetherlands AT deleeuwevelyne workingatthenexusbetweenpublichealthpolicypracticeandresearchdynamicsofknowledgesharinginthenetherlands AT hoeijmakersmarjan workingatthenexusbetweenpublichealthpolicypracticeandresearchdynamicsofknowledgesharinginthenetherlands AT devriesnannek workingatthenexusbetweenpublichealthpolicypracticeandresearchdynamicsofknowledgesharinginthenetherlands |