Cargando…

Assessment of gene order computing methods for Alzheimer's disease

BACKGROUND: Computational genomics of Alzheimer disease (AD), the most common form of senile dementia, is a nascent field in AD research. The field includes AD gene clustering by computing gene order which generates higher quality gene clustering patterns than most other clustering methods. However,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hu, Benqiong, Jiang, Gang, Pang, Chaoyang, Wang, Shipeng, Liu, Qingzhong, Chen, Zhongxue, Vanderburg, Charles R, Rogers, Jack T, Deng, Youping, Huang, Xudong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3552676/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23369541
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1755-8794-6-S1-S8
_version_ 1782256697652281344
author Hu, Benqiong
Jiang, Gang
Pang, Chaoyang
Wang, Shipeng
Liu, Qingzhong
Chen, Zhongxue
Vanderburg, Charles R
Rogers, Jack T
Deng, Youping
Huang, Xudong
author_facet Hu, Benqiong
Jiang, Gang
Pang, Chaoyang
Wang, Shipeng
Liu, Qingzhong
Chen, Zhongxue
Vanderburg, Charles R
Rogers, Jack T
Deng, Youping
Huang, Xudong
author_sort Hu, Benqiong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Computational genomics of Alzheimer disease (AD), the most common form of senile dementia, is a nascent field in AD research. The field includes AD gene clustering by computing gene order which generates higher quality gene clustering patterns than most other clustering methods. However, there are few available gene order computing methods such as Genetic Algorithm (GA) and Ant Colony Optimization (ACO). Further, their performance in gene order computation using AD microarray data is not known. We thus set forth to evaluate the performances of current gene order computing methods with different distance formulas, and to identify additional features associated with gene order computation. METHODS: Using different distance formulas- Pearson distance and Euclidean distance, the squared Euclidean distance, and other conditions, gene orders were calculated by ACO and GA (including standard GA and improved GA) methods, respectively. The qualities of the gene orders were compared, and new features from the calculated gene orders were identified. RESULTS: Compared to the GA methods tested in this study, ACO fits the AD microarray data the best when calculating gene order. In addition, the following features were revealed: different distance formulas generated a different quality of gene order, and the commonly used Pearson distance was not the best distance formula when used with both GA and ACO methods for AD microarray data. CONCLUSION: Compared with Pearson distance and Euclidean distance, the squared Euclidean distance generated the best quality gene order computed by GA and ACO methods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3552676
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35526762013-01-28 Assessment of gene order computing methods for Alzheimer's disease Hu, Benqiong Jiang, Gang Pang, Chaoyang Wang, Shipeng Liu, Qingzhong Chen, Zhongxue Vanderburg, Charles R Rogers, Jack T Deng, Youping Huang, Xudong BMC Med Genomics Research BACKGROUND: Computational genomics of Alzheimer disease (AD), the most common form of senile dementia, is a nascent field in AD research. The field includes AD gene clustering by computing gene order which generates higher quality gene clustering patterns than most other clustering methods. However, there are few available gene order computing methods such as Genetic Algorithm (GA) and Ant Colony Optimization (ACO). Further, their performance in gene order computation using AD microarray data is not known. We thus set forth to evaluate the performances of current gene order computing methods with different distance formulas, and to identify additional features associated with gene order computation. METHODS: Using different distance formulas- Pearson distance and Euclidean distance, the squared Euclidean distance, and other conditions, gene orders were calculated by ACO and GA (including standard GA and improved GA) methods, respectively. The qualities of the gene orders were compared, and new features from the calculated gene orders were identified. RESULTS: Compared to the GA methods tested in this study, ACO fits the AD microarray data the best when calculating gene order. In addition, the following features were revealed: different distance formulas generated a different quality of gene order, and the commonly used Pearson distance was not the best distance formula when used with both GA and ACO methods for AD microarray data. CONCLUSION: Compared with Pearson distance and Euclidean distance, the squared Euclidean distance generated the best quality gene order computed by GA and ACO methods. BioMed Central 2013-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3552676/ /pubmed/23369541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1755-8794-6-S1-S8 Text en Copyright ©2013 Hu et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Hu, Benqiong
Jiang, Gang
Pang, Chaoyang
Wang, Shipeng
Liu, Qingzhong
Chen, Zhongxue
Vanderburg, Charles R
Rogers, Jack T
Deng, Youping
Huang, Xudong
Assessment of gene order computing methods for Alzheimer's disease
title Assessment of gene order computing methods for Alzheimer's disease
title_full Assessment of gene order computing methods for Alzheimer's disease
title_fullStr Assessment of gene order computing methods for Alzheimer's disease
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of gene order computing methods for Alzheimer's disease
title_short Assessment of gene order computing methods for Alzheimer's disease
title_sort assessment of gene order computing methods for alzheimer's disease
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3552676/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23369541
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1755-8794-6-S1-S8
work_keys_str_mv AT hubenqiong assessmentofgeneordercomputingmethodsforalzheimersdisease
AT jianggang assessmentofgeneordercomputingmethodsforalzheimersdisease
AT pangchaoyang assessmentofgeneordercomputingmethodsforalzheimersdisease
AT wangshipeng assessmentofgeneordercomputingmethodsforalzheimersdisease
AT liuqingzhong assessmentofgeneordercomputingmethodsforalzheimersdisease
AT chenzhongxue assessmentofgeneordercomputingmethodsforalzheimersdisease
AT vanderburgcharlesr assessmentofgeneordercomputingmethodsforalzheimersdisease
AT rogersjackt assessmentofgeneordercomputingmethodsforalzheimersdisease
AT dengyouping assessmentofgeneordercomputingmethodsforalzheimersdisease
AT huangxudong assessmentofgeneordercomputingmethodsforalzheimersdisease