Cargando…

Stereotactic body radiation therapy in the re-irradiation situation – a review

Although locoregional relapse is frequent after definitive radiotherapy (RT) or multimodal treatments, re-irradiation is only performed in few patients even in palliative settings like e.g. vertebral metastasis. This is most due to concern about potentially severe complications, especially when larg...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mantel, Frederick, Flentje, Michael, Guckenberger, Matthias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3552718/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23289496
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-8-7
_version_ 1782256707160768512
author Mantel, Frederick
Flentje, Michael
Guckenberger, Matthias
author_facet Mantel, Frederick
Flentje, Michael
Guckenberger, Matthias
author_sort Mantel, Frederick
collection PubMed
description Although locoregional relapse is frequent after definitive radiotherapy (RT) or multimodal treatments, re-irradiation is only performed in few patients even in palliative settings like e.g. vertebral metastasis. This is most due to concern about potentially severe complications, especially when large volumes are exposed to re-irradiation. With technological advancements in treatment planning the interest in re-irradiation as a local treatment approach has been reinforced. Recently, several studies reported re-irradiation for spinal metastases using SBRT with promising local and symptom control rates and simultaneously low rates of toxicity. These early data consistently indicate that SBRT is a safe and effective treatment modality in this clinical situation, where other treatment alternatives are rare. Similarly, good results have been shown for SBRT in the re-irradiation of head and neck tumors. Despite severe late adverse effects were reported in several studies, especially after single fraction doses >10 Gy, they appear less frequently compared to conventional radiotherapy. Few studies with small patient numbers have been published on SBRT re-irradiation for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Overall survival (OS) is limited by systemic progression and seems to depend particularly on patient selection. SBRT re-irradiation after primary SBRT should not be practiced in centrally located tumors due to high risk of severe toxicity. Only limited data is available for SBRT re-irradiation of pelvic tumors: feasibility and acceptable toxicity has been described, suggesting SBRT as a complementary treatment modality for local symptom control.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3552718
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35527182013-01-28 Stereotactic body radiation therapy in the re-irradiation situation – a review Mantel, Frederick Flentje, Michael Guckenberger, Matthias Radiat Oncol Review Although locoregional relapse is frequent after definitive radiotherapy (RT) or multimodal treatments, re-irradiation is only performed in few patients even in palliative settings like e.g. vertebral metastasis. This is most due to concern about potentially severe complications, especially when large volumes are exposed to re-irradiation. With technological advancements in treatment planning the interest in re-irradiation as a local treatment approach has been reinforced. Recently, several studies reported re-irradiation for spinal metastases using SBRT with promising local and symptom control rates and simultaneously low rates of toxicity. These early data consistently indicate that SBRT is a safe and effective treatment modality in this clinical situation, where other treatment alternatives are rare. Similarly, good results have been shown for SBRT in the re-irradiation of head and neck tumors. Despite severe late adverse effects were reported in several studies, especially after single fraction doses >10 Gy, they appear less frequently compared to conventional radiotherapy. Few studies with small patient numbers have been published on SBRT re-irradiation for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Overall survival (OS) is limited by systemic progression and seems to depend particularly on patient selection. SBRT re-irradiation after primary SBRT should not be practiced in centrally located tumors due to high risk of severe toxicity. Only limited data is available for SBRT re-irradiation of pelvic tumors: feasibility and acceptable toxicity has been described, suggesting SBRT as a complementary treatment modality for local symptom control. BioMed Central 2013-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3552718/ /pubmed/23289496 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-8-7 Text en Copyright ©2013 Mantel et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Mantel, Frederick
Flentje, Michael
Guckenberger, Matthias
Stereotactic body radiation therapy in the re-irradiation situation – a review
title Stereotactic body radiation therapy in the re-irradiation situation – a review
title_full Stereotactic body radiation therapy in the re-irradiation situation – a review
title_fullStr Stereotactic body radiation therapy in the re-irradiation situation – a review
title_full_unstemmed Stereotactic body radiation therapy in the re-irradiation situation – a review
title_short Stereotactic body radiation therapy in the re-irradiation situation – a review
title_sort stereotactic body radiation therapy in the re-irradiation situation – a review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3552718/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23289496
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-8-7
work_keys_str_mv AT mantelfrederick stereotacticbodyradiationtherapyinthereirradiationsituationareview
AT flentjemichael stereotacticbodyradiationtherapyinthereirradiationsituationareview
AT guckenbergermatthias stereotacticbodyradiationtherapyinthereirradiationsituationareview