Cargando…

Mutual research capacity strengthening: a qualitative study of two-way partnerships in public health research

INTRODUCTION: Capacity building has been employed in international health and development sectors to describe the process of ‘experts’ from more resourced countries training people in less resourced countries. Hence the concept has an implicit power imbalance based on ‘expert’ knowledge. In 2011, a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Redman-MacLaren, Michelle, MacLaren, David J, Harrington, Humpress, Asugeni, Rowena, Timothy-Harrington, Relmah, Kekeubata, Esau, Speare, Richard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3552762/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23249439
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-9276-11-79
_version_ 1782256716979634176
author Redman-MacLaren, Michelle
MacLaren, David J
Harrington, Humpress
Asugeni, Rowena
Timothy-Harrington, Relmah
Kekeubata, Esau
Speare, Richard
author_facet Redman-MacLaren, Michelle
MacLaren, David J
Harrington, Humpress
Asugeni, Rowena
Timothy-Harrington, Relmah
Kekeubata, Esau
Speare, Richard
author_sort Redman-MacLaren, Michelle
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Capacity building has been employed in international health and development sectors to describe the process of ‘experts’ from more resourced countries training people in less resourced countries. Hence the concept has an implicit power imbalance based on ‘expert’ knowledge. In 2011, a health research strengthening workshop was undertaken at Atoifi Adventist Hospital, Solomon Islands to further strengthen research skills of the Hospital and College of Nursing staff and East Kwaio community leaders through partnering in practical research projects. The workshop was based on participatory research frameworks underpinned by decolonising methodologies, which sought to challenge historical power imbalances and inequities. Our research question was, “Is research capacity strengthening a two-way process?” METHODS: In this qualitative study, five Solomon Islanders and five Australians each responded to four open-ended questions about their experience of the research capacity strengthening workshop and activities: five chose face to face interview, five chose to provide written responses. Written responses and interview transcripts were inductively analysed in NVivo 9. RESULTS: Six major themes emerged. These were: Respectful relationships; Increased knowledge and experience with research process; Participation at all stages in the research process; Contribution to public health action; Support and sustain research opportunities; and Managing challenges of capacity strengthening. All researchers identified benefits for themselves, their institution and/or community, regardless of their role or country of origin, indicating that the capacity strengthening had been a two-way process. CONCLUSIONS: The flexible and responsive process we used to strengthen research capacity was identified as mutually beneficial. Using community-based participatory frameworks underpinned by decolonising methodologies is assisting to redress historical power imbalances and inequities and is helping to sustain the initial steps taken to establish a local research agenda at Atoifi Hospital. It is our experience that embedding mutuality throughout the research capacity strengthening process has had great benefit and may also benefit researchers from more resourced and less resourced countries wanting to partner in research capacity strengthening activities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3552762
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35527622013-01-28 Mutual research capacity strengthening: a qualitative study of two-way partnerships in public health research Redman-MacLaren, Michelle MacLaren, David J Harrington, Humpress Asugeni, Rowena Timothy-Harrington, Relmah Kekeubata, Esau Speare, Richard Int J Equity Health Research INTRODUCTION: Capacity building has been employed in international health and development sectors to describe the process of ‘experts’ from more resourced countries training people in less resourced countries. Hence the concept has an implicit power imbalance based on ‘expert’ knowledge. In 2011, a health research strengthening workshop was undertaken at Atoifi Adventist Hospital, Solomon Islands to further strengthen research skills of the Hospital and College of Nursing staff and East Kwaio community leaders through partnering in practical research projects. The workshop was based on participatory research frameworks underpinned by decolonising methodologies, which sought to challenge historical power imbalances and inequities. Our research question was, “Is research capacity strengthening a two-way process?” METHODS: In this qualitative study, five Solomon Islanders and five Australians each responded to four open-ended questions about their experience of the research capacity strengthening workshop and activities: five chose face to face interview, five chose to provide written responses. Written responses and interview transcripts were inductively analysed in NVivo 9. RESULTS: Six major themes emerged. These were: Respectful relationships; Increased knowledge and experience with research process; Participation at all stages in the research process; Contribution to public health action; Support and sustain research opportunities; and Managing challenges of capacity strengthening. All researchers identified benefits for themselves, their institution and/or community, regardless of their role or country of origin, indicating that the capacity strengthening had been a two-way process. CONCLUSIONS: The flexible and responsive process we used to strengthen research capacity was identified as mutually beneficial. Using community-based participatory frameworks underpinned by decolonising methodologies is assisting to redress historical power imbalances and inequities and is helping to sustain the initial steps taken to establish a local research agenda at Atoifi Hospital. It is our experience that embedding mutuality throughout the research capacity strengthening process has had great benefit and may also benefit researchers from more resourced and less resourced countries wanting to partner in research capacity strengthening activities. BioMed Central 2012-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3552762/ /pubmed/23249439 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-9276-11-79 Text en Copyright ©2012 Redman-MacLaren et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Redman-MacLaren, Michelle
MacLaren, David J
Harrington, Humpress
Asugeni, Rowena
Timothy-Harrington, Relmah
Kekeubata, Esau
Speare, Richard
Mutual research capacity strengthening: a qualitative study of two-way partnerships in public health research
title Mutual research capacity strengthening: a qualitative study of two-way partnerships in public health research
title_full Mutual research capacity strengthening: a qualitative study of two-way partnerships in public health research
title_fullStr Mutual research capacity strengthening: a qualitative study of two-way partnerships in public health research
title_full_unstemmed Mutual research capacity strengthening: a qualitative study of two-way partnerships in public health research
title_short Mutual research capacity strengthening: a qualitative study of two-way partnerships in public health research
title_sort mutual research capacity strengthening: a qualitative study of two-way partnerships in public health research
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3552762/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23249439
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-9276-11-79
work_keys_str_mv AT redmanmaclarenmichelle mutualresearchcapacitystrengtheningaqualitativestudyoftwowaypartnershipsinpublichealthresearch
AT maclarendavidj mutualresearchcapacitystrengtheningaqualitativestudyoftwowaypartnershipsinpublichealthresearch
AT harringtonhumpress mutualresearchcapacitystrengtheningaqualitativestudyoftwowaypartnershipsinpublichealthresearch
AT asugenirowena mutualresearchcapacitystrengtheningaqualitativestudyoftwowaypartnershipsinpublichealthresearch
AT timothyharringtonrelmah mutualresearchcapacitystrengtheningaqualitativestudyoftwowaypartnershipsinpublichealthresearch
AT kekeubataesau mutualresearchcapacitystrengtheningaqualitativestudyoftwowaypartnershipsinpublichealthresearch
AT spearerichard mutualresearchcapacitystrengtheningaqualitativestudyoftwowaypartnershipsinpublichealthresearch