Cargando…

Major incident preparedness and on-site work among Norwegian rescue personnel – a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: A major incident has occurred when the number of live casualties, severity, type of incident or location requires extraordinary resources. Major incident management is interdisciplinary and involves triage, treatment and transport of patients. We aimed to investigate experiences within m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fattah, Sabina, Krüger, Andreas J, Andersen, Jan Einar, Vigerust, Trond, Rehn, Marius
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3552867/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23134634
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1865-1380-5-40
_version_ 1782256740231806976
author Fattah, Sabina
Krüger, Andreas J
Andersen, Jan Einar
Vigerust, Trond
Rehn, Marius
author_facet Fattah, Sabina
Krüger, Andreas J
Andersen, Jan Einar
Vigerust, Trond
Rehn, Marius
author_sort Fattah, Sabina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A major incident has occurred when the number of live casualties, severity, type of incident or location requires extraordinary resources. Major incident management is interdisciplinary and involves triage, treatment and transport of patients. We aimed to investigate experiences within major incident preparedness and management among Norwegian rescue workers. METHODS: A questionnaire was answered by 918 rescue workers across Norway. Questions rated from 1 (doesn’t work) to 7 (works excellently) are presented as median and range. RESULTS: Health-care personnel constituted 34.1% of the participants, firefighters 54.1% and police 11.8%. Training for major incident response scored 5 (1, 7) among health-care workers and 4 (1, 7) among firefighters and police. Preparedness for major incident response scored 5 (1, 7) for all professions. Interdisciplinary cooperation scored 5 (3, 7) among health-care workers and police and 5 (1, 7) among firefighters. Among health-care workers, 77.5% answered that a system for major-incident triage exists; 56.3% had triage equipment available. The majority – 45.1% of health-care workers, 44.7% of firefighters and 60.4% of police – did not know how long it would take to get emergency stretchers to the scene. CONCLUSIONS: Rescue personnel find major incident preparedness and on-scene multidisciplinary cooperation to function well. Some shortcomings are reported with regard to systems for major incident triage, tagging equipment for triage and knowledge about access to emergency stretchers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3552867
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Springer
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35528672013-01-28 Major incident preparedness and on-site work among Norwegian rescue personnel – a cross-sectional study Fattah, Sabina Krüger, Andreas J Andersen, Jan Einar Vigerust, Trond Rehn, Marius Int J Emerg Med Original Research BACKGROUND: A major incident has occurred when the number of live casualties, severity, type of incident or location requires extraordinary resources. Major incident management is interdisciplinary and involves triage, treatment and transport of patients. We aimed to investigate experiences within major incident preparedness and management among Norwegian rescue workers. METHODS: A questionnaire was answered by 918 rescue workers across Norway. Questions rated from 1 (doesn’t work) to 7 (works excellently) are presented as median and range. RESULTS: Health-care personnel constituted 34.1% of the participants, firefighters 54.1% and police 11.8%. Training for major incident response scored 5 (1, 7) among health-care workers and 4 (1, 7) among firefighters and police. Preparedness for major incident response scored 5 (1, 7) for all professions. Interdisciplinary cooperation scored 5 (3, 7) among health-care workers and police and 5 (1, 7) among firefighters. Among health-care workers, 77.5% answered that a system for major-incident triage exists; 56.3% had triage equipment available. The majority – 45.1% of health-care workers, 44.7% of firefighters and 60.4% of police – did not know how long it would take to get emergency stretchers to the scene. CONCLUSIONS: Rescue personnel find major incident preparedness and on-scene multidisciplinary cooperation to function well. Some shortcomings are reported with regard to systems for major incident triage, tagging equipment for triage and knowledge about access to emergency stretchers. Springer 2012-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3552867/ /pubmed/23134634 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1865-1380-5-40 Text en Copyright ©2012 Fattah et al.; licensee Springer. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Fattah, Sabina
Krüger, Andreas J
Andersen, Jan Einar
Vigerust, Trond
Rehn, Marius
Major incident preparedness and on-site work among Norwegian rescue personnel – a cross-sectional study
title Major incident preparedness and on-site work among Norwegian rescue personnel – a cross-sectional study
title_full Major incident preparedness and on-site work among Norwegian rescue personnel – a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Major incident preparedness and on-site work among Norwegian rescue personnel – a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Major incident preparedness and on-site work among Norwegian rescue personnel – a cross-sectional study
title_short Major incident preparedness and on-site work among Norwegian rescue personnel – a cross-sectional study
title_sort major incident preparedness and on-site work among norwegian rescue personnel – a cross-sectional study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3552867/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23134634
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1865-1380-5-40
work_keys_str_mv AT fattahsabina majorincidentpreparednessandonsiteworkamongnorwegianrescuepersonnelacrosssectionalstudy
AT krugerandreasj majorincidentpreparednessandonsiteworkamongnorwegianrescuepersonnelacrosssectionalstudy
AT andersenjaneinar majorincidentpreparednessandonsiteworkamongnorwegianrescuepersonnelacrosssectionalstudy
AT vigerusttrond majorincidentpreparednessandonsiteworkamongnorwegianrescuepersonnelacrosssectionalstudy
AT rehnmarius majorincidentpreparednessandonsiteworkamongnorwegianrescuepersonnelacrosssectionalstudy