Cargando…
Major incident preparedness and on-site work among Norwegian rescue personnel – a cross-sectional study
BACKGROUND: A major incident has occurred when the number of live casualties, severity, type of incident or location requires extraordinary resources. Major incident management is interdisciplinary and involves triage, treatment and transport of patients. We aimed to investigate experiences within m...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3552867/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23134634 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1865-1380-5-40 |
_version_ | 1782256740231806976 |
---|---|
author | Fattah, Sabina Krüger, Andreas J Andersen, Jan Einar Vigerust, Trond Rehn, Marius |
author_facet | Fattah, Sabina Krüger, Andreas J Andersen, Jan Einar Vigerust, Trond Rehn, Marius |
author_sort | Fattah, Sabina |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A major incident has occurred when the number of live casualties, severity, type of incident or location requires extraordinary resources. Major incident management is interdisciplinary and involves triage, treatment and transport of patients. We aimed to investigate experiences within major incident preparedness and management among Norwegian rescue workers. METHODS: A questionnaire was answered by 918 rescue workers across Norway. Questions rated from 1 (doesn’t work) to 7 (works excellently) are presented as median and range. RESULTS: Health-care personnel constituted 34.1% of the participants, firefighters 54.1% and police 11.8%. Training for major incident response scored 5 (1, 7) among health-care workers and 4 (1, 7) among firefighters and police. Preparedness for major incident response scored 5 (1, 7) for all professions. Interdisciplinary cooperation scored 5 (3, 7) among health-care workers and police and 5 (1, 7) among firefighters. Among health-care workers, 77.5% answered that a system for major-incident triage exists; 56.3% had triage equipment available. The majority – 45.1% of health-care workers, 44.7% of firefighters and 60.4% of police – did not know how long it would take to get emergency stretchers to the scene. CONCLUSIONS: Rescue personnel find major incident preparedness and on-scene multidisciplinary cooperation to function well. Some shortcomings are reported with regard to systems for major incident triage, tagging equipment for triage and knowledge about access to emergency stretchers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3552867 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Springer |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35528672013-01-28 Major incident preparedness and on-site work among Norwegian rescue personnel – a cross-sectional study Fattah, Sabina Krüger, Andreas J Andersen, Jan Einar Vigerust, Trond Rehn, Marius Int J Emerg Med Original Research BACKGROUND: A major incident has occurred when the number of live casualties, severity, type of incident or location requires extraordinary resources. Major incident management is interdisciplinary and involves triage, treatment and transport of patients. We aimed to investigate experiences within major incident preparedness and management among Norwegian rescue workers. METHODS: A questionnaire was answered by 918 rescue workers across Norway. Questions rated from 1 (doesn’t work) to 7 (works excellently) are presented as median and range. RESULTS: Health-care personnel constituted 34.1% of the participants, firefighters 54.1% and police 11.8%. Training for major incident response scored 5 (1, 7) among health-care workers and 4 (1, 7) among firefighters and police. Preparedness for major incident response scored 5 (1, 7) for all professions. Interdisciplinary cooperation scored 5 (3, 7) among health-care workers and police and 5 (1, 7) among firefighters. Among health-care workers, 77.5% answered that a system for major-incident triage exists; 56.3% had triage equipment available. The majority – 45.1% of health-care workers, 44.7% of firefighters and 60.4% of police – did not know how long it would take to get emergency stretchers to the scene. CONCLUSIONS: Rescue personnel find major incident preparedness and on-scene multidisciplinary cooperation to function well. Some shortcomings are reported with regard to systems for major incident triage, tagging equipment for triage and knowledge about access to emergency stretchers. Springer 2012-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3552867/ /pubmed/23134634 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1865-1380-5-40 Text en Copyright ©2012 Fattah et al.; licensee Springer. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Fattah, Sabina Krüger, Andreas J Andersen, Jan Einar Vigerust, Trond Rehn, Marius Major incident preparedness and on-site work among Norwegian rescue personnel – a cross-sectional study |
title | Major incident preparedness and on-site work among Norwegian rescue personnel – a cross-sectional study |
title_full | Major incident preparedness and on-site work among Norwegian rescue personnel – a cross-sectional study |
title_fullStr | Major incident preparedness and on-site work among Norwegian rescue personnel – a cross-sectional study |
title_full_unstemmed | Major incident preparedness and on-site work among Norwegian rescue personnel – a cross-sectional study |
title_short | Major incident preparedness and on-site work among Norwegian rescue personnel – a cross-sectional study |
title_sort | major incident preparedness and on-site work among norwegian rescue personnel – a cross-sectional study |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3552867/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23134634 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1865-1380-5-40 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fattahsabina majorincidentpreparednessandonsiteworkamongnorwegianrescuepersonnelacrosssectionalstudy AT krugerandreasj majorincidentpreparednessandonsiteworkamongnorwegianrescuepersonnelacrosssectionalstudy AT andersenjaneinar majorincidentpreparednessandonsiteworkamongnorwegianrescuepersonnelacrosssectionalstudy AT vigerusttrond majorincidentpreparednessandonsiteworkamongnorwegianrescuepersonnelacrosssectionalstudy AT rehnmarius majorincidentpreparednessandonsiteworkamongnorwegianrescuepersonnelacrosssectionalstudy |