Cargando…
Reliability and validity of the Wolfram Unified Rating Scale (WURS)
BACKGROUND: Wolfram syndrome (WFS) is a rare, neurodegenerative disease that typically presents with childhood onset insulin dependent diabetes mellitus, followed by optic atrophy, diabetes insipidus, deafness, and neurological and psychiatric dysfunction. There is no cure for the disease, but recen...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3552944/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23148655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1750-1172-7-89 |
_version_ | 1782256749882900480 |
---|---|
author | Nguyen, Chau Foster, Erin R Paciorkowski, Alexander R Viehoever, Amy Considine, Colleen Bondurant, Aidena Marshall, Bess A Hershey, Tamara |
author_facet | Nguyen, Chau Foster, Erin R Paciorkowski, Alexander R Viehoever, Amy Considine, Colleen Bondurant, Aidena Marshall, Bess A Hershey, Tamara |
author_sort | Nguyen, Chau |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Wolfram syndrome (WFS) is a rare, neurodegenerative disease that typically presents with childhood onset insulin dependent diabetes mellitus, followed by optic atrophy, diabetes insipidus, deafness, and neurological and psychiatric dysfunction. There is no cure for the disease, but recent advances in research have improved understanding of the disease course. Measuring disease severity and progression with reliable and validated tools is a prerequisite for clinical trials of any new intervention for neurodegenerative conditions. To this end, we developed the Wolfram Unified Rating Scale (WURS) to measure the severity and individual variability of WFS symptoms. The aim of this study is to develop and test the reliability and validity of the Wolfram Unified Rating Scale (WURS). METHODS: A rating scale of disease severity in WFS was developed by modifying a standardized assessment for another neurodegenerative condition (Batten disease). WFS experts scored the representativeness of WURS items for the disease. The WURS was administered to 13 individuals with WFS (6-25 years of age). Motor, balance, mood and quality of life were also evaluated with standard instruments. Inter-rater reliability, internal consistency reliability, concurrent, predictive and content validity of the WURS were calculated. RESULTS: The WURS had high inter-rater reliability (ICCs>.93), moderate to high internal consistency reliability (Cronbach’s α = 0.78-0.91) and demonstrated good concurrent and predictive validity. There were significant correlations between the WURS Physical Assessment and motor and balance tests (r(s)>.67, p<.03), between the WURS Behavioral Scale and reports of mood and behavior (r(s)>.76, p<.04) and between WURS Total scores and quality of life (r(s)=-.86, p=.001). The WURS demonstrated acceptable content validity (Scale-Content Validity Index=0.83). CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary findings demonstrate that the WURS has acceptable reliability and validity and captures individual differences in disease severity in children and young adults with WFS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3552944 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35529442013-01-28 Reliability and validity of the Wolfram Unified Rating Scale (WURS) Nguyen, Chau Foster, Erin R Paciorkowski, Alexander R Viehoever, Amy Considine, Colleen Bondurant, Aidena Marshall, Bess A Hershey, Tamara Orphanet J Rare Dis Research BACKGROUND: Wolfram syndrome (WFS) is a rare, neurodegenerative disease that typically presents with childhood onset insulin dependent diabetes mellitus, followed by optic atrophy, diabetes insipidus, deafness, and neurological and psychiatric dysfunction. There is no cure for the disease, but recent advances in research have improved understanding of the disease course. Measuring disease severity and progression with reliable and validated tools is a prerequisite for clinical trials of any new intervention for neurodegenerative conditions. To this end, we developed the Wolfram Unified Rating Scale (WURS) to measure the severity and individual variability of WFS symptoms. The aim of this study is to develop and test the reliability and validity of the Wolfram Unified Rating Scale (WURS). METHODS: A rating scale of disease severity in WFS was developed by modifying a standardized assessment for another neurodegenerative condition (Batten disease). WFS experts scored the representativeness of WURS items for the disease. The WURS was administered to 13 individuals with WFS (6-25 years of age). Motor, balance, mood and quality of life were also evaluated with standard instruments. Inter-rater reliability, internal consistency reliability, concurrent, predictive and content validity of the WURS were calculated. RESULTS: The WURS had high inter-rater reliability (ICCs>.93), moderate to high internal consistency reliability (Cronbach’s α = 0.78-0.91) and demonstrated good concurrent and predictive validity. There were significant correlations between the WURS Physical Assessment and motor and balance tests (r(s)>.67, p<.03), between the WURS Behavioral Scale and reports of mood and behavior (r(s)>.76, p<.04) and between WURS Total scores and quality of life (r(s)=-.86, p=.001). The WURS demonstrated acceptable content validity (Scale-Content Validity Index=0.83). CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary findings demonstrate that the WURS has acceptable reliability and validity and captures individual differences in disease severity in children and young adults with WFS. BioMed Central 2012-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3552944/ /pubmed/23148655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1750-1172-7-89 Text en Copyright ©2012 Nguyen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Nguyen, Chau Foster, Erin R Paciorkowski, Alexander R Viehoever, Amy Considine, Colleen Bondurant, Aidena Marshall, Bess A Hershey, Tamara Reliability and validity of the Wolfram Unified Rating Scale (WURS) |
title | Reliability and validity of the Wolfram Unified Rating Scale (WURS) |
title_full | Reliability and validity of the Wolfram Unified Rating Scale (WURS) |
title_fullStr | Reliability and validity of the Wolfram Unified Rating Scale (WURS) |
title_full_unstemmed | Reliability and validity of the Wolfram Unified Rating Scale (WURS) |
title_short | Reliability and validity of the Wolfram Unified Rating Scale (WURS) |
title_sort | reliability and validity of the wolfram unified rating scale (wurs) |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3552944/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23148655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1750-1172-7-89 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nguyenchau reliabilityandvalidityofthewolframunifiedratingscalewurs AT fostererinr reliabilityandvalidityofthewolframunifiedratingscalewurs AT paciorkowskialexanderr reliabilityandvalidityofthewolframunifiedratingscalewurs AT viehoeveramy reliabilityandvalidityofthewolframunifiedratingscalewurs AT considinecolleen reliabilityandvalidityofthewolframunifiedratingscalewurs AT bondurantaidena reliabilityandvalidityofthewolframunifiedratingscalewurs AT marshallbessa reliabilityandvalidityofthewolframunifiedratingscalewurs AT hersheytamara reliabilityandvalidityofthewolframunifiedratingscalewurs |