Cargando…
Does Wheat Genetically Modified for Disease Resistance Affect Root-Colonizing Pseudomonads and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi?
This study aimed to evaluate the impact of genetically modified (GM) wheat with introduced pm3b mildew resistance transgene, on two types of root-colonizing microorganisms, namely pseudomonads and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF). Our investigations were carried out in field trials over three fiel...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3553117/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23372672 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053825 |
_version_ | 1782256787090571264 |
---|---|
author | Meyer, Joana Beatrice Song-Wilson, Yi Foetzki, Andrea Luginbühl, Carolin Winzeler, Michael Kneubühler, Yvan Matasci, Caterina Mascher-Frutschi, Fabio Kalinina, Olena Boller, Thomas Keel, Christoph Maurhofer, Monika |
author_facet | Meyer, Joana Beatrice Song-Wilson, Yi Foetzki, Andrea Luginbühl, Carolin Winzeler, Michael Kneubühler, Yvan Matasci, Caterina Mascher-Frutschi, Fabio Kalinina, Olena Boller, Thomas Keel, Christoph Maurhofer, Monika |
author_sort | Meyer, Joana Beatrice |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study aimed to evaluate the impact of genetically modified (GM) wheat with introduced pm3b mildew resistance transgene, on two types of root-colonizing microorganisms, namely pseudomonads and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF). Our investigations were carried out in field trials over three field seasons and at two locations. Serial dilution in selective King's B medium and microscopy were used to assess the abundance of cultivable pseudomonads and AMF, respectively. We developed a denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) method to characterize the diversity of the pqqC gene, which is involved in Pseudomonas phosphate solubilization. A major result was that in the first field season Pseudomonas abundances and diversity on roots of GM pm3b lines, but also on non-GM sister lines were different from those of the parental lines and conventional wheat cultivars. This indicates a strong effect of the procedures by which these plants were created, as GM and sister lines were generated via tissue cultures and propagated in the greenhouse. Moreover, Pseudomonas population sizes and DGGE profiles varied considerably between individual GM lines with different genomic locations of the pm3b transgene. At individual time points, differences in Pseudomonas and AMF accumulation between GM and control lines were detected, but they were not consistent and much less pronounced than differences detected between young and old plants, different conventional wheat cultivars or at different locations and field seasons. Thus, we conclude that impacts of GM wheat on plant-beneficial root-colonizing microorganisms are minor and not of ecological importance. The cultivation-independent pqqC-DGGE approach proved to be a useful tool for monitoring the dynamics of Pseudomonas populations in a wheat field and even sensitive enough for detecting population responses to altered plant physiology. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3553117 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35531172013-01-31 Does Wheat Genetically Modified for Disease Resistance Affect Root-Colonizing Pseudomonads and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi? Meyer, Joana Beatrice Song-Wilson, Yi Foetzki, Andrea Luginbühl, Carolin Winzeler, Michael Kneubühler, Yvan Matasci, Caterina Mascher-Frutschi, Fabio Kalinina, Olena Boller, Thomas Keel, Christoph Maurhofer, Monika PLoS One Research Article This study aimed to evaluate the impact of genetically modified (GM) wheat with introduced pm3b mildew resistance transgene, on two types of root-colonizing microorganisms, namely pseudomonads and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF). Our investigations were carried out in field trials over three field seasons and at two locations. Serial dilution in selective King's B medium and microscopy were used to assess the abundance of cultivable pseudomonads and AMF, respectively. We developed a denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) method to characterize the diversity of the pqqC gene, which is involved in Pseudomonas phosphate solubilization. A major result was that in the first field season Pseudomonas abundances and diversity on roots of GM pm3b lines, but also on non-GM sister lines were different from those of the parental lines and conventional wheat cultivars. This indicates a strong effect of the procedures by which these plants were created, as GM and sister lines were generated via tissue cultures and propagated in the greenhouse. Moreover, Pseudomonas population sizes and DGGE profiles varied considerably between individual GM lines with different genomic locations of the pm3b transgene. At individual time points, differences in Pseudomonas and AMF accumulation between GM and control lines were detected, but they were not consistent and much less pronounced than differences detected between young and old plants, different conventional wheat cultivars or at different locations and field seasons. Thus, we conclude that impacts of GM wheat on plant-beneficial root-colonizing microorganisms are minor and not of ecological importance. The cultivation-independent pqqC-DGGE approach proved to be a useful tool for monitoring the dynamics of Pseudomonas populations in a wheat field and even sensitive enough for detecting population responses to altered plant physiology. Public Library of Science 2013-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3553117/ /pubmed/23372672 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053825 Text en © 2013 Meyer et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Meyer, Joana Beatrice Song-Wilson, Yi Foetzki, Andrea Luginbühl, Carolin Winzeler, Michael Kneubühler, Yvan Matasci, Caterina Mascher-Frutschi, Fabio Kalinina, Olena Boller, Thomas Keel, Christoph Maurhofer, Monika Does Wheat Genetically Modified for Disease Resistance Affect Root-Colonizing Pseudomonads and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi? |
title | Does Wheat Genetically Modified for Disease Resistance Affect Root-Colonizing Pseudomonads and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi? |
title_full | Does Wheat Genetically Modified for Disease Resistance Affect Root-Colonizing Pseudomonads and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi? |
title_fullStr | Does Wheat Genetically Modified for Disease Resistance Affect Root-Colonizing Pseudomonads and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi? |
title_full_unstemmed | Does Wheat Genetically Modified for Disease Resistance Affect Root-Colonizing Pseudomonads and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi? |
title_short | Does Wheat Genetically Modified for Disease Resistance Affect Root-Colonizing Pseudomonads and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi? |
title_sort | does wheat genetically modified for disease resistance affect root-colonizing pseudomonads and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3553117/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23372672 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053825 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT meyerjoanabeatrice doeswheatgeneticallymodifiedfordiseaseresistanceaffectrootcolonizingpseudomonadsandarbuscularmycorrhizalfungi AT songwilsonyi doeswheatgeneticallymodifiedfordiseaseresistanceaffectrootcolonizingpseudomonadsandarbuscularmycorrhizalfungi AT foetzkiandrea doeswheatgeneticallymodifiedfordiseaseresistanceaffectrootcolonizingpseudomonadsandarbuscularmycorrhizalfungi AT luginbuhlcarolin doeswheatgeneticallymodifiedfordiseaseresistanceaffectrootcolonizingpseudomonadsandarbuscularmycorrhizalfungi AT winzelermichael doeswheatgeneticallymodifiedfordiseaseresistanceaffectrootcolonizingpseudomonadsandarbuscularmycorrhizalfungi AT kneubuhleryvan doeswheatgeneticallymodifiedfordiseaseresistanceaffectrootcolonizingpseudomonadsandarbuscularmycorrhizalfungi AT matascicaterina doeswheatgeneticallymodifiedfordiseaseresistanceaffectrootcolonizingpseudomonadsandarbuscularmycorrhizalfungi AT mascherfrutschifabio doeswheatgeneticallymodifiedfordiseaseresistanceaffectrootcolonizingpseudomonadsandarbuscularmycorrhizalfungi AT kalininaolena doeswheatgeneticallymodifiedfordiseaseresistanceaffectrootcolonizingpseudomonadsandarbuscularmycorrhizalfungi AT bollerthomas doeswheatgeneticallymodifiedfordiseaseresistanceaffectrootcolonizingpseudomonadsandarbuscularmycorrhizalfungi AT keelchristoph doeswheatgeneticallymodifiedfordiseaseresistanceaffectrootcolonizingpseudomonadsandarbuscularmycorrhizalfungi AT maurhofermonika doeswheatgeneticallymodifiedfordiseaseresistanceaffectrootcolonizingpseudomonadsandarbuscularmycorrhizalfungi |