Cargando…

Does Wheat Genetically Modified for Disease Resistance Affect Root-Colonizing Pseudomonads and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi?

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of genetically modified (GM) wheat with introduced pm3b mildew resistance transgene, on two types of root-colonizing microorganisms, namely pseudomonads and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF). Our investigations were carried out in field trials over three fiel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meyer, Joana Beatrice, Song-Wilson, Yi, Foetzki, Andrea, Luginbühl, Carolin, Winzeler, Michael, Kneubühler, Yvan, Matasci, Caterina, Mascher-Frutschi, Fabio, Kalinina, Olena, Boller, Thomas, Keel, Christoph, Maurhofer, Monika
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3553117/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23372672
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053825
_version_ 1782256787090571264
author Meyer, Joana Beatrice
Song-Wilson, Yi
Foetzki, Andrea
Luginbühl, Carolin
Winzeler, Michael
Kneubühler, Yvan
Matasci, Caterina
Mascher-Frutschi, Fabio
Kalinina, Olena
Boller, Thomas
Keel, Christoph
Maurhofer, Monika
author_facet Meyer, Joana Beatrice
Song-Wilson, Yi
Foetzki, Andrea
Luginbühl, Carolin
Winzeler, Michael
Kneubühler, Yvan
Matasci, Caterina
Mascher-Frutschi, Fabio
Kalinina, Olena
Boller, Thomas
Keel, Christoph
Maurhofer, Monika
author_sort Meyer, Joana Beatrice
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to evaluate the impact of genetically modified (GM) wheat with introduced pm3b mildew resistance transgene, on two types of root-colonizing microorganisms, namely pseudomonads and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF). Our investigations were carried out in field trials over three field seasons and at two locations. Serial dilution in selective King's B medium and microscopy were used to assess the abundance of cultivable pseudomonads and AMF, respectively. We developed a denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) method to characterize the diversity of the pqqC gene, which is involved in Pseudomonas phosphate solubilization. A major result was that in the first field season Pseudomonas abundances and diversity on roots of GM pm3b lines, but also on non-GM sister lines were different from those of the parental lines and conventional wheat cultivars. This indicates a strong effect of the procedures by which these plants were created, as GM and sister lines were generated via tissue cultures and propagated in the greenhouse. Moreover, Pseudomonas population sizes and DGGE profiles varied considerably between individual GM lines with different genomic locations of the pm3b transgene. At individual time points, differences in Pseudomonas and AMF accumulation between GM and control lines were detected, but they were not consistent and much less pronounced than differences detected between young and old plants, different conventional wheat cultivars or at different locations and field seasons. Thus, we conclude that impacts of GM wheat on plant-beneficial root-colonizing microorganisms are minor and not of ecological importance. The cultivation-independent pqqC-DGGE approach proved to be a useful tool for monitoring the dynamics of Pseudomonas populations in a wheat field and even sensitive enough for detecting population responses to altered plant physiology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3553117
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35531172013-01-31 Does Wheat Genetically Modified for Disease Resistance Affect Root-Colonizing Pseudomonads and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi? Meyer, Joana Beatrice Song-Wilson, Yi Foetzki, Andrea Luginbühl, Carolin Winzeler, Michael Kneubühler, Yvan Matasci, Caterina Mascher-Frutschi, Fabio Kalinina, Olena Boller, Thomas Keel, Christoph Maurhofer, Monika PLoS One Research Article This study aimed to evaluate the impact of genetically modified (GM) wheat with introduced pm3b mildew resistance transgene, on two types of root-colonizing microorganisms, namely pseudomonads and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF). Our investigations were carried out in field trials over three field seasons and at two locations. Serial dilution in selective King's B medium and microscopy were used to assess the abundance of cultivable pseudomonads and AMF, respectively. We developed a denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) method to characterize the diversity of the pqqC gene, which is involved in Pseudomonas phosphate solubilization. A major result was that in the first field season Pseudomonas abundances and diversity on roots of GM pm3b lines, but also on non-GM sister lines were different from those of the parental lines and conventional wheat cultivars. This indicates a strong effect of the procedures by which these plants were created, as GM and sister lines were generated via tissue cultures and propagated in the greenhouse. Moreover, Pseudomonas population sizes and DGGE profiles varied considerably between individual GM lines with different genomic locations of the pm3b transgene. At individual time points, differences in Pseudomonas and AMF accumulation between GM and control lines were detected, but they were not consistent and much less pronounced than differences detected between young and old plants, different conventional wheat cultivars or at different locations and field seasons. Thus, we conclude that impacts of GM wheat on plant-beneficial root-colonizing microorganisms are minor and not of ecological importance. The cultivation-independent pqqC-DGGE approach proved to be a useful tool for monitoring the dynamics of Pseudomonas populations in a wheat field and even sensitive enough for detecting population responses to altered plant physiology. Public Library of Science 2013-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3553117/ /pubmed/23372672 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053825 Text en © 2013 Meyer et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Meyer, Joana Beatrice
Song-Wilson, Yi
Foetzki, Andrea
Luginbühl, Carolin
Winzeler, Michael
Kneubühler, Yvan
Matasci, Caterina
Mascher-Frutschi, Fabio
Kalinina, Olena
Boller, Thomas
Keel, Christoph
Maurhofer, Monika
Does Wheat Genetically Modified for Disease Resistance Affect Root-Colonizing Pseudomonads and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi?
title Does Wheat Genetically Modified for Disease Resistance Affect Root-Colonizing Pseudomonads and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi?
title_full Does Wheat Genetically Modified for Disease Resistance Affect Root-Colonizing Pseudomonads and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi?
title_fullStr Does Wheat Genetically Modified for Disease Resistance Affect Root-Colonizing Pseudomonads and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi?
title_full_unstemmed Does Wheat Genetically Modified for Disease Resistance Affect Root-Colonizing Pseudomonads and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi?
title_short Does Wheat Genetically Modified for Disease Resistance Affect Root-Colonizing Pseudomonads and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi?
title_sort does wheat genetically modified for disease resistance affect root-colonizing pseudomonads and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3553117/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23372672
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053825
work_keys_str_mv AT meyerjoanabeatrice doeswheatgeneticallymodifiedfordiseaseresistanceaffectrootcolonizingpseudomonadsandarbuscularmycorrhizalfungi
AT songwilsonyi doeswheatgeneticallymodifiedfordiseaseresistanceaffectrootcolonizingpseudomonadsandarbuscularmycorrhizalfungi
AT foetzkiandrea doeswheatgeneticallymodifiedfordiseaseresistanceaffectrootcolonizingpseudomonadsandarbuscularmycorrhizalfungi
AT luginbuhlcarolin doeswheatgeneticallymodifiedfordiseaseresistanceaffectrootcolonizingpseudomonadsandarbuscularmycorrhizalfungi
AT winzelermichael doeswheatgeneticallymodifiedfordiseaseresistanceaffectrootcolonizingpseudomonadsandarbuscularmycorrhizalfungi
AT kneubuhleryvan doeswheatgeneticallymodifiedfordiseaseresistanceaffectrootcolonizingpseudomonadsandarbuscularmycorrhizalfungi
AT matascicaterina doeswheatgeneticallymodifiedfordiseaseresistanceaffectrootcolonizingpseudomonadsandarbuscularmycorrhizalfungi
AT mascherfrutschifabio doeswheatgeneticallymodifiedfordiseaseresistanceaffectrootcolonizingpseudomonadsandarbuscularmycorrhizalfungi
AT kalininaolena doeswheatgeneticallymodifiedfordiseaseresistanceaffectrootcolonizingpseudomonadsandarbuscularmycorrhizalfungi
AT bollerthomas doeswheatgeneticallymodifiedfordiseaseresistanceaffectrootcolonizingpseudomonadsandarbuscularmycorrhizalfungi
AT keelchristoph doeswheatgeneticallymodifiedfordiseaseresistanceaffectrootcolonizingpseudomonadsandarbuscularmycorrhizalfungi
AT maurhofermonika doeswheatgeneticallymodifiedfordiseaseresistanceaffectrootcolonizingpseudomonadsandarbuscularmycorrhizalfungi