Cargando…

Optimal electrocardiographic limb lead set for rapid emphysema screening

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary emphysema of any etiology has been shown to be strongly and quasidiagnostically associated with a vertical frontal P wave axis. A vertical P wave axis (>60 degrees) during sinus rhythm can be easily determined by a P wave in lead III greater than the P wave in lead I (bipola...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bajaj, Rishi, Chhabra, Lovely, Basheer, Zainab, Spodick, David H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3553652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23378754
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S37776
_version_ 1782256840604647424
author Bajaj, Rishi
Chhabra, Lovely
Basheer, Zainab
Spodick, David H
author_facet Bajaj, Rishi
Chhabra, Lovely
Basheer, Zainab
Spodick, David H
author_sort Bajaj, Rishi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pulmonary emphysema of any etiology has been shown to be strongly and quasidiagnostically associated with a vertical frontal P wave axis. A vertical P wave axis (>60 degrees) during sinus rhythm can be easily determined by a P wave in lead III greater than the P wave in lead I (bipolar lead set) or a dominantly negative P wave in aVL (unipolar lead set). The purpose of this investigation was to determine which set of limb leads may be better for identifying the vertical P vector of emphysema in adults. METHODS: Unselected consecutive electrocardiograms from 100 patients with a diagnosis of emphysema were analyzed to determine the P wave axis. Patients aged younger than 45 years, those not in sinus rhythm, and those with poor quality tracings were excluded. The electrocardiographic data were divided into three categories depending on the frontal P wave axis, ie, >60 degrees, 60 degrees, or <60 degrees, by each criterion (P amplitude lead III > lead I and a negative P wave in aVL). RESULTS: Sixty-six percent of patients had a P wave axis > 60 degrees based on aVL, and 88% of patients had a P wave axis > 60 degrees based on the P wave in lead III being greater than in lead I. CONCLUSION: A P wave in lead III greater than that in lead I is a more sensitive marker than a negative P wave in aVL for diagnosing emphysema and is recommended for rapid routine screening.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3553652
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35536522013-02-01 Optimal electrocardiographic limb lead set for rapid emphysema screening Bajaj, Rishi Chhabra, Lovely Basheer, Zainab Spodick, David H Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Original Research BACKGROUND: Pulmonary emphysema of any etiology has been shown to be strongly and quasidiagnostically associated with a vertical frontal P wave axis. A vertical P wave axis (>60 degrees) during sinus rhythm can be easily determined by a P wave in lead III greater than the P wave in lead I (bipolar lead set) or a dominantly negative P wave in aVL (unipolar lead set). The purpose of this investigation was to determine which set of limb leads may be better for identifying the vertical P vector of emphysema in adults. METHODS: Unselected consecutive electrocardiograms from 100 patients with a diagnosis of emphysema were analyzed to determine the P wave axis. Patients aged younger than 45 years, those not in sinus rhythm, and those with poor quality tracings were excluded. The electrocardiographic data were divided into three categories depending on the frontal P wave axis, ie, >60 degrees, 60 degrees, or <60 degrees, by each criterion (P amplitude lead III > lead I and a negative P wave in aVL). RESULTS: Sixty-six percent of patients had a P wave axis > 60 degrees based on aVL, and 88% of patients had a P wave axis > 60 degrees based on the P wave in lead III being greater than in lead I. CONCLUSION: A P wave in lead III greater than that in lead I is a more sensitive marker than a negative P wave in aVL for diagnosing emphysema and is recommended for rapid routine screening. Dove Medical Press 2013 2013-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3553652/ /pubmed/23378754 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S37776 Text en © 2013 Bajaj et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Bajaj, Rishi
Chhabra, Lovely
Basheer, Zainab
Spodick, David H
Optimal electrocardiographic limb lead set for rapid emphysema screening
title Optimal electrocardiographic limb lead set for rapid emphysema screening
title_full Optimal electrocardiographic limb lead set for rapid emphysema screening
title_fullStr Optimal electrocardiographic limb lead set for rapid emphysema screening
title_full_unstemmed Optimal electrocardiographic limb lead set for rapid emphysema screening
title_short Optimal electrocardiographic limb lead set for rapid emphysema screening
title_sort optimal electrocardiographic limb lead set for rapid emphysema screening
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3553652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23378754
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S37776
work_keys_str_mv AT bajajrishi optimalelectrocardiographiclimbleadsetforrapidemphysemascreening
AT chhabralovely optimalelectrocardiographiclimbleadsetforrapidemphysemascreening
AT basheerzainab optimalelectrocardiographiclimbleadsetforrapidemphysemascreening
AT spodickdavidh optimalelectrocardiographiclimbleadsetforrapidemphysemascreening