Cargando…
Optimal electrocardiographic limb lead set for rapid emphysema screening
BACKGROUND: Pulmonary emphysema of any etiology has been shown to be strongly and quasidiagnostically associated with a vertical frontal P wave axis. A vertical P wave axis (>60 degrees) during sinus rhythm can be easily determined by a P wave in lead III greater than the P wave in lead I (bipola...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3553652/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23378754 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S37776 |
_version_ | 1782256840604647424 |
---|---|
author | Bajaj, Rishi Chhabra, Lovely Basheer, Zainab Spodick, David H |
author_facet | Bajaj, Rishi Chhabra, Lovely Basheer, Zainab Spodick, David H |
author_sort | Bajaj, Rishi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Pulmonary emphysema of any etiology has been shown to be strongly and quasidiagnostically associated with a vertical frontal P wave axis. A vertical P wave axis (>60 degrees) during sinus rhythm can be easily determined by a P wave in lead III greater than the P wave in lead I (bipolar lead set) or a dominantly negative P wave in aVL (unipolar lead set). The purpose of this investigation was to determine which set of limb leads may be better for identifying the vertical P vector of emphysema in adults. METHODS: Unselected consecutive electrocardiograms from 100 patients with a diagnosis of emphysema were analyzed to determine the P wave axis. Patients aged younger than 45 years, those not in sinus rhythm, and those with poor quality tracings were excluded. The electrocardiographic data were divided into three categories depending on the frontal P wave axis, ie, >60 degrees, 60 degrees, or <60 degrees, by each criterion (P amplitude lead III > lead I and a negative P wave in aVL). RESULTS: Sixty-six percent of patients had a P wave axis > 60 degrees based on aVL, and 88% of patients had a P wave axis > 60 degrees based on the P wave in lead III being greater than in lead I. CONCLUSION: A P wave in lead III greater than that in lead I is a more sensitive marker than a negative P wave in aVL for diagnosing emphysema and is recommended for rapid routine screening. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3553652 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35536522013-02-01 Optimal electrocardiographic limb lead set for rapid emphysema screening Bajaj, Rishi Chhabra, Lovely Basheer, Zainab Spodick, David H Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Original Research BACKGROUND: Pulmonary emphysema of any etiology has been shown to be strongly and quasidiagnostically associated with a vertical frontal P wave axis. A vertical P wave axis (>60 degrees) during sinus rhythm can be easily determined by a P wave in lead III greater than the P wave in lead I (bipolar lead set) or a dominantly negative P wave in aVL (unipolar lead set). The purpose of this investigation was to determine which set of limb leads may be better for identifying the vertical P vector of emphysema in adults. METHODS: Unselected consecutive electrocardiograms from 100 patients with a diagnosis of emphysema were analyzed to determine the P wave axis. Patients aged younger than 45 years, those not in sinus rhythm, and those with poor quality tracings were excluded. The electrocardiographic data were divided into three categories depending on the frontal P wave axis, ie, >60 degrees, 60 degrees, or <60 degrees, by each criterion (P amplitude lead III > lead I and a negative P wave in aVL). RESULTS: Sixty-six percent of patients had a P wave axis > 60 degrees based on aVL, and 88% of patients had a P wave axis > 60 degrees based on the P wave in lead III being greater than in lead I. CONCLUSION: A P wave in lead III greater than that in lead I is a more sensitive marker than a negative P wave in aVL for diagnosing emphysema and is recommended for rapid routine screening. Dove Medical Press 2013 2013-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3553652/ /pubmed/23378754 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S37776 Text en © 2013 Bajaj et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Bajaj, Rishi Chhabra, Lovely Basheer, Zainab Spodick, David H Optimal electrocardiographic limb lead set for rapid emphysema screening |
title | Optimal electrocardiographic limb lead set for rapid emphysema screening |
title_full | Optimal electrocardiographic limb lead set for rapid emphysema screening |
title_fullStr | Optimal electrocardiographic limb lead set for rapid emphysema screening |
title_full_unstemmed | Optimal electrocardiographic limb lead set for rapid emphysema screening |
title_short | Optimal electrocardiographic limb lead set for rapid emphysema screening |
title_sort | optimal electrocardiographic limb lead set for rapid emphysema screening |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3553652/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23378754 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S37776 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bajajrishi optimalelectrocardiographiclimbleadsetforrapidemphysemascreening AT chhabralovely optimalelectrocardiographiclimbleadsetforrapidemphysemascreening AT basheerzainab optimalelectrocardiographiclimbleadsetforrapidemphysemascreening AT spodickdavidh optimalelectrocardiographiclimbleadsetforrapidemphysemascreening |