Cargando…

The Effects of Free-Living Interval-Walking Training on Glycemic Control, Body Composition, and Physical Fitness in Type 2 Diabetic Patients: A randomized, controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of free-living walking training in type 2 diabetic patients and to investigate the effects of interval-walking training versus continuous-walking training upon physical fitness, body composition, and glycemic control. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Subjects with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karstoft, Kristian, Winding, Kamilla, Knudsen, Sine H., Nielsen, Jens S., Thomsen, Carsten, Pedersen, Bente K., Solomon, Thomas P.J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Diabetes Association 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3554285/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23002086
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc12-0658
_version_ 1782256867495378944
author Karstoft, Kristian
Winding, Kamilla
Knudsen, Sine H.
Nielsen, Jens S.
Thomsen, Carsten
Pedersen, Bente K.
Solomon, Thomas P.J.
author_facet Karstoft, Kristian
Winding, Kamilla
Knudsen, Sine H.
Nielsen, Jens S.
Thomsen, Carsten
Pedersen, Bente K.
Solomon, Thomas P.J.
author_sort Karstoft, Kristian
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of free-living walking training in type 2 diabetic patients and to investigate the effects of interval-walking training versus continuous-walking training upon physical fitness, body composition, and glycemic control. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Subjects with type 2 diabetes were randomized to a control (n = 8), continuous-walking (n = 12), or interval-walking group (n = 12). Training groups were prescribed five sessions per week (60 min/session) and were controlled with an accelerometer and a heart-rate monitor. Continuous walkers performed all training at moderate intensity, whereas interval walkers alternated 3-min repetitions at low and high intensity. Before and after the 4-month intervention, the following variables were measured: VO(2)max, body composition, and glycemic control (fasting glucose, HbA(1c), oral glucose tolerance test, and continuous glucose monitoring [CGM]). RESULTS: Training adherence was high (89 ± 4%), and training energy expenditure and mean intensity were comparable. VO(2)max increased 16.1 ± 3.7% in the interval-walking group (P < 0.05), whereas no changes were observed in the continuous-walking or control group. Body mass and adiposity (fat mass and visceral fat) decreased in the interval-walking group only (P < 0.05). Glycemic control (elevated mean CGM glucose levels and increased fasting insulin) worsened in the control group (P < 0.05), whereas mean (P = 0.05) and maximum (P < 0.05) CGM glucose levels decreased in the interval-walking group. The continuous walkers showed no changes in glycemic control. CONCLUSIONS: Free-living walking training is feasible in type 2 diabetic patients. Continuous walking offsets the deterioration in glycemia seen in the control group, and interval walking is superior to energy expenditure–matched continuous walking for improving physical fitness, body composition, and glycemic control.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3554285
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher American Diabetes Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35542852014-02-01 The Effects of Free-Living Interval-Walking Training on Glycemic Control, Body Composition, and Physical Fitness in Type 2 Diabetic Patients: A randomized, controlled trial Karstoft, Kristian Winding, Kamilla Knudsen, Sine H. Nielsen, Jens S. Thomsen, Carsten Pedersen, Bente K. Solomon, Thomas P.J. Diabetes Care Original Research OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of free-living walking training in type 2 diabetic patients and to investigate the effects of interval-walking training versus continuous-walking training upon physical fitness, body composition, and glycemic control. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Subjects with type 2 diabetes were randomized to a control (n = 8), continuous-walking (n = 12), or interval-walking group (n = 12). Training groups were prescribed five sessions per week (60 min/session) and were controlled with an accelerometer and a heart-rate monitor. Continuous walkers performed all training at moderate intensity, whereas interval walkers alternated 3-min repetitions at low and high intensity. Before and after the 4-month intervention, the following variables were measured: VO(2)max, body composition, and glycemic control (fasting glucose, HbA(1c), oral glucose tolerance test, and continuous glucose monitoring [CGM]). RESULTS: Training adherence was high (89 ± 4%), and training energy expenditure and mean intensity were comparable. VO(2)max increased 16.1 ± 3.7% in the interval-walking group (P < 0.05), whereas no changes were observed in the continuous-walking or control group. Body mass and adiposity (fat mass and visceral fat) decreased in the interval-walking group only (P < 0.05). Glycemic control (elevated mean CGM glucose levels and increased fasting insulin) worsened in the control group (P < 0.05), whereas mean (P = 0.05) and maximum (P < 0.05) CGM glucose levels decreased in the interval-walking group. The continuous walkers showed no changes in glycemic control. CONCLUSIONS: Free-living walking training is feasible in type 2 diabetic patients. Continuous walking offsets the deterioration in glycemia seen in the control group, and interval walking is superior to energy expenditure–matched continuous walking for improving physical fitness, body composition, and glycemic control. American Diabetes Association 2013-02 2013-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3554285/ /pubmed/23002086 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc12-0658 Text en © 2013 by the American Diabetes Association. Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ for details.
spellingShingle Original Research
Karstoft, Kristian
Winding, Kamilla
Knudsen, Sine H.
Nielsen, Jens S.
Thomsen, Carsten
Pedersen, Bente K.
Solomon, Thomas P.J.
The Effects of Free-Living Interval-Walking Training on Glycemic Control, Body Composition, and Physical Fitness in Type 2 Diabetic Patients: A randomized, controlled trial
title The Effects of Free-Living Interval-Walking Training on Glycemic Control, Body Composition, and Physical Fitness in Type 2 Diabetic Patients: A randomized, controlled trial
title_full The Effects of Free-Living Interval-Walking Training on Glycemic Control, Body Composition, and Physical Fitness in Type 2 Diabetic Patients: A randomized, controlled trial
title_fullStr The Effects of Free-Living Interval-Walking Training on Glycemic Control, Body Composition, and Physical Fitness in Type 2 Diabetic Patients: A randomized, controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed The Effects of Free-Living Interval-Walking Training on Glycemic Control, Body Composition, and Physical Fitness in Type 2 Diabetic Patients: A randomized, controlled trial
title_short The Effects of Free-Living Interval-Walking Training on Glycemic Control, Body Composition, and Physical Fitness in Type 2 Diabetic Patients: A randomized, controlled trial
title_sort effects of free-living interval-walking training on glycemic control, body composition, and physical fitness in type 2 diabetic patients: a randomized, controlled trial
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3554285/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23002086
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc12-0658
work_keys_str_mv AT karstoftkristian theeffectsoffreelivingintervalwalkingtrainingonglycemiccontrolbodycompositionandphysicalfitnessintype2diabeticpatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT windingkamilla theeffectsoffreelivingintervalwalkingtrainingonglycemiccontrolbodycompositionandphysicalfitnessintype2diabeticpatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT knudsensineh theeffectsoffreelivingintervalwalkingtrainingonglycemiccontrolbodycompositionandphysicalfitnessintype2diabeticpatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT nielsenjenss theeffectsoffreelivingintervalwalkingtrainingonglycemiccontrolbodycompositionandphysicalfitnessintype2diabeticpatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT thomsencarsten theeffectsoffreelivingintervalwalkingtrainingonglycemiccontrolbodycompositionandphysicalfitnessintype2diabeticpatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT pedersenbentek theeffectsoffreelivingintervalwalkingtrainingonglycemiccontrolbodycompositionandphysicalfitnessintype2diabeticpatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT solomonthomaspj theeffectsoffreelivingintervalwalkingtrainingonglycemiccontrolbodycompositionandphysicalfitnessintype2diabeticpatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT karstoftkristian effectsoffreelivingintervalwalkingtrainingonglycemiccontrolbodycompositionandphysicalfitnessintype2diabeticpatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT windingkamilla effectsoffreelivingintervalwalkingtrainingonglycemiccontrolbodycompositionandphysicalfitnessintype2diabeticpatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT knudsensineh effectsoffreelivingintervalwalkingtrainingonglycemiccontrolbodycompositionandphysicalfitnessintype2diabeticpatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT nielsenjenss effectsoffreelivingintervalwalkingtrainingonglycemiccontrolbodycompositionandphysicalfitnessintype2diabeticpatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT thomsencarsten effectsoffreelivingintervalwalkingtrainingonglycemiccontrolbodycompositionandphysicalfitnessintype2diabeticpatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT pedersenbentek effectsoffreelivingintervalwalkingtrainingonglycemiccontrolbodycompositionandphysicalfitnessintype2diabeticpatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT solomonthomaspj effectsoffreelivingintervalwalkingtrainingonglycemiccontrolbodycompositionandphysicalfitnessintype2diabeticpatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial