Cargando…
Internet testing for Chlamydia trachomatis in England, 2006 to 2010
BACKGROUND: In recent years there has been interest in websites as a means of increasing access to free chlamydia tests through the National Chlamydia Screening Programme (NCSP) in England. We aimed to describe and evaluate online access to chlamydia testing within the NCSP. METHODS: We analysed NCS...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3554557/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23253518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-1095 |
_version_ | 1782256918690004992 |
---|---|
author | Woodhall, Sarah C Sile, Bersabeh Talebi, Alireza Nardone, Anthony Baraitser, Paula |
author_facet | Woodhall, Sarah C Sile, Bersabeh Talebi, Alireza Nardone, Anthony Baraitser, Paula |
author_sort | Woodhall, Sarah C |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In recent years there has been interest in websites as a means of increasing access to free chlamydia tests through the National Chlamydia Screening Programme (NCSP) in England. We aimed to describe and evaluate online access to chlamydia testing within the NCSP. METHODS: We analysed NCSP chlamydia testing data (2006–2010) for 15–24 year olds from the 71/95 programme areas in England where site codes were available to identify tests ordered through the internet. The characteristics of people using online testing services in 2010 were compared with those testing in general practice (GP) or community sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services. We evaluated 58 websites offering free chlamydia tests through the NCSP, and 32 offering kits on a commercial basis for signposting to clinical service and health promotion advice offered. RESULTS: Between 2006 and 2010, 5% of all tests in the included programme areas were accessed through the internet. The number of internet tests increased from 18 (<1% of all tests) in 2006 to 59,750 in 2010 (6% of all NCSP tests). In 2010 the proportion of NCSP tests accessed online by programme area ranged from <1% to 38%. The proportion of tests with a positive result on the internet was higher than tests from general practice and comparable to those from community SRH services (internet 7.6%; GP 5.6%; Community SRH 8.2%). A higher proportion of people accessing online testing were male, aged 20–24 and reported >1 sexual partner in the past year. Provision of sexual health information and appropriate signposting for those in need of clinical services varied between websites. Service provision within the NCSP was fragmented with multiple providers serving specific geographical catchment areas. CONCLUSION: Internet testing reaches a population with a relatively high risk of chlamydia infection and appears acceptable to young men, a group that has been difficult to engage with chlamydia testing. In order to maximise the potential benefit of these services, websites should be consistent with national guidelines and adhere to minimum standards for signposting to clinical care and health promotion information. The current system with multiple providers servicing geographically specific catchment areas is contrary to the geographically unrestricted nature of the internet and potentially confusing for clients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3554557 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35545572013-01-29 Internet testing for Chlamydia trachomatis in England, 2006 to 2010 Woodhall, Sarah C Sile, Bersabeh Talebi, Alireza Nardone, Anthony Baraitser, Paula BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: In recent years there has been interest in websites as a means of increasing access to free chlamydia tests through the National Chlamydia Screening Programme (NCSP) in England. We aimed to describe and evaluate online access to chlamydia testing within the NCSP. METHODS: We analysed NCSP chlamydia testing data (2006–2010) for 15–24 year olds from the 71/95 programme areas in England where site codes were available to identify tests ordered through the internet. The characteristics of people using online testing services in 2010 were compared with those testing in general practice (GP) or community sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services. We evaluated 58 websites offering free chlamydia tests through the NCSP, and 32 offering kits on a commercial basis for signposting to clinical service and health promotion advice offered. RESULTS: Between 2006 and 2010, 5% of all tests in the included programme areas were accessed through the internet. The number of internet tests increased from 18 (<1% of all tests) in 2006 to 59,750 in 2010 (6% of all NCSP tests). In 2010 the proportion of NCSP tests accessed online by programme area ranged from <1% to 38%. The proportion of tests with a positive result on the internet was higher than tests from general practice and comparable to those from community SRH services (internet 7.6%; GP 5.6%; Community SRH 8.2%). A higher proportion of people accessing online testing were male, aged 20–24 and reported >1 sexual partner in the past year. Provision of sexual health information and appropriate signposting for those in need of clinical services varied between websites. Service provision within the NCSP was fragmented with multiple providers serving specific geographical catchment areas. CONCLUSION: Internet testing reaches a population with a relatively high risk of chlamydia infection and appears acceptable to young men, a group that has been difficult to engage with chlamydia testing. In order to maximise the potential benefit of these services, websites should be consistent with national guidelines and adhere to minimum standards for signposting to clinical care and health promotion information. The current system with multiple providers servicing geographically specific catchment areas is contrary to the geographically unrestricted nature of the internet and potentially confusing for clients. BioMed Central 2012-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3554557/ /pubmed/23253518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-1095 Text en Copyright ©2012 Woodhall et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Woodhall, Sarah C Sile, Bersabeh Talebi, Alireza Nardone, Anthony Baraitser, Paula Internet testing for Chlamydia trachomatis in England, 2006 to 2010 |
title | Internet testing for Chlamydia trachomatis in England, 2006 to 2010 |
title_full | Internet testing for Chlamydia trachomatis in England, 2006 to 2010 |
title_fullStr | Internet testing for Chlamydia trachomatis in England, 2006 to 2010 |
title_full_unstemmed | Internet testing for Chlamydia trachomatis in England, 2006 to 2010 |
title_short | Internet testing for Chlamydia trachomatis in England, 2006 to 2010 |
title_sort | internet testing for chlamydia trachomatis in england, 2006 to 2010 |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3554557/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23253518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-1095 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT woodhallsarahc internettestingforchlamydiatrachomatisinengland2006to2010 AT silebersabeh internettestingforchlamydiatrachomatisinengland2006to2010 AT talebialireza internettestingforchlamydiatrachomatisinengland2006to2010 AT nardoneanthony internettestingforchlamydiatrachomatisinengland2006to2010 AT baraitserpaula internettestingforchlamydiatrachomatisinengland2006to2010 |