Cargando…
Grasp Detection from Human ECoG during Natural Reach-to-Grasp Movements
Various movement parameters of grasping movements, like velocity or type of the grasp, have been successfully decoded from neural activity. However, the question of movement event detection from brain activity, that is, decoding the time at which an event occurred (e.g. movement onset), has been add...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3554656/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23359537 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054658 |
_version_ | 1782256945858609152 |
---|---|
author | Pistohl, Tobias Schmidt, Thomas Sebastian Benedikt Ball, Tonio Schulze-Bonhage, Andreas Aertsen, Ad Mehring, Carsten |
author_facet | Pistohl, Tobias Schmidt, Thomas Sebastian Benedikt Ball, Tonio Schulze-Bonhage, Andreas Aertsen, Ad Mehring, Carsten |
author_sort | Pistohl, Tobias |
collection | PubMed |
description | Various movement parameters of grasping movements, like velocity or type of the grasp, have been successfully decoded from neural activity. However, the question of movement event detection from brain activity, that is, decoding the time at which an event occurred (e.g. movement onset), has been addressed less often. Yet, this may be a topic of key importance, as a brain-machine interface (BMI) that controls a grasping prosthesis could be realized by detecting the time of grasp, together with an optional decoding of which type of grasp to apply. We, therefore, studied the detection of time of grasps from human ECoG recordings during a sequence of natural and continuous reach-to-grasp movements. Using signals recorded from the motor cortex, a detector based on regularized linear discriminant analysis was able to retrieve the time-point of grasp with high reliability and only few false detections. Best performance was achieved using a combination of signal components from time and frequency domains. Sensitivity, measured by the amount of correct detections, and specificity, represented by the amount of false detections, depended strongly on the imposed restrictions on temporal precision of detection and on the delay between event detection and the time the event occurred. Including neural data from after the event into the decoding analysis, slightly increased accuracy, however, reasonable performance could also be obtained when grasping events were detected 125 ms in advance. In summary, our results provide a good basis for using detection of grasping movements from ECoG to control a grasping prosthesis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3554656 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35546562013-01-28 Grasp Detection from Human ECoG during Natural Reach-to-Grasp Movements Pistohl, Tobias Schmidt, Thomas Sebastian Benedikt Ball, Tonio Schulze-Bonhage, Andreas Aertsen, Ad Mehring, Carsten PLoS One Research Article Various movement parameters of grasping movements, like velocity or type of the grasp, have been successfully decoded from neural activity. However, the question of movement event detection from brain activity, that is, decoding the time at which an event occurred (e.g. movement onset), has been addressed less often. Yet, this may be a topic of key importance, as a brain-machine interface (BMI) that controls a grasping prosthesis could be realized by detecting the time of grasp, together with an optional decoding of which type of grasp to apply. We, therefore, studied the detection of time of grasps from human ECoG recordings during a sequence of natural and continuous reach-to-grasp movements. Using signals recorded from the motor cortex, a detector based on regularized linear discriminant analysis was able to retrieve the time-point of grasp with high reliability and only few false detections. Best performance was achieved using a combination of signal components from time and frequency domains. Sensitivity, measured by the amount of correct detections, and specificity, represented by the amount of false detections, depended strongly on the imposed restrictions on temporal precision of detection and on the delay between event detection and the time the event occurred. Including neural data from after the event into the decoding analysis, slightly increased accuracy, however, reasonable performance could also be obtained when grasping events were detected 125 ms in advance. In summary, our results provide a good basis for using detection of grasping movements from ECoG to control a grasping prosthesis. Public Library of Science 2013-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3554656/ /pubmed/23359537 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054658 Text en © 2013 Pistohl et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Pistohl, Tobias Schmidt, Thomas Sebastian Benedikt Ball, Tonio Schulze-Bonhage, Andreas Aertsen, Ad Mehring, Carsten Grasp Detection from Human ECoG during Natural Reach-to-Grasp Movements |
title | Grasp Detection from Human ECoG during Natural Reach-to-Grasp Movements |
title_full | Grasp Detection from Human ECoG during Natural Reach-to-Grasp Movements |
title_fullStr | Grasp Detection from Human ECoG during Natural Reach-to-Grasp Movements |
title_full_unstemmed | Grasp Detection from Human ECoG during Natural Reach-to-Grasp Movements |
title_short | Grasp Detection from Human ECoG during Natural Reach-to-Grasp Movements |
title_sort | grasp detection from human ecog during natural reach-to-grasp movements |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3554656/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23359537 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054658 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pistohltobias graspdetectionfromhumanecogduringnaturalreachtograspmovements AT schmidtthomassebastianbenedikt graspdetectionfromhumanecogduringnaturalreachtograspmovements AT balltonio graspdetectionfromhumanecogduringnaturalreachtograspmovements AT schulzebonhageandreas graspdetectionfromhumanecogduringnaturalreachtograspmovements AT aertsenad graspdetectionfromhumanecogduringnaturalreachtograspmovements AT mehringcarsten graspdetectionfromhumanecogduringnaturalreachtograspmovements |