Cargando…

Grasp Detection from Human ECoG during Natural Reach-to-Grasp Movements

Various movement parameters of grasping movements, like velocity or type of the grasp, have been successfully decoded from neural activity. However, the question of movement event detection from brain activity, that is, decoding the time at which an event occurred (e.g. movement onset), has been add...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pistohl, Tobias, Schmidt, Thomas Sebastian Benedikt, Ball, Tonio, Schulze-Bonhage, Andreas, Aertsen, Ad, Mehring, Carsten
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3554656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23359537
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054658
_version_ 1782256945858609152
author Pistohl, Tobias
Schmidt, Thomas Sebastian Benedikt
Ball, Tonio
Schulze-Bonhage, Andreas
Aertsen, Ad
Mehring, Carsten
author_facet Pistohl, Tobias
Schmidt, Thomas Sebastian Benedikt
Ball, Tonio
Schulze-Bonhage, Andreas
Aertsen, Ad
Mehring, Carsten
author_sort Pistohl, Tobias
collection PubMed
description Various movement parameters of grasping movements, like velocity or type of the grasp, have been successfully decoded from neural activity. However, the question of movement event detection from brain activity, that is, decoding the time at which an event occurred (e.g. movement onset), has been addressed less often. Yet, this may be a topic of key importance, as a brain-machine interface (BMI) that controls a grasping prosthesis could be realized by detecting the time of grasp, together with an optional decoding of which type of grasp to apply. We, therefore, studied the detection of time of grasps from human ECoG recordings during a sequence of natural and continuous reach-to-grasp movements. Using signals recorded from the motor cortex, a detector based on regularized linear discriminant analysis was able to retrieve the time-point of grasp with high reliability and only few false detections. Best performance was achieved using a combination of signal components from time and frequency domains. Sensitivity, measured by the amount of correct detections, and specificity, represented by the amount of false detections, depended strongly on the imposed restrictions on temporal precision of detection and on the delay between event detection and the time the event occurred. Including neural data from after the event into the decoding analysis, slightly increased accuracy, however, reasonable performance could also be obtained when grasping events were detected 125 ms in advance. In summary, our results provide a good basis for using detection of grasping movements from ECoG to control a grasping prosthesis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3554656
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35546562013-01-28 Grasp Detection from Human ECoG during Natural Reach-to-Grasp Movements Pistohl, Tobias Schmidt, Thomas Sebastian Benedikt Ball, Tonio Schulze-Bonhage, Andreas Aertsen, Ad Mehring, Carsten PLoS One Research Article Various movement parameters of grasping movements, like velocity or type of the grasp, have been successfully decoded from neural activity. However, the question of movement event detection from brain activity, that is, decoding the time at which an event occurred (e.g. movement onset), has been addressed less often. Yet, this may be a topic of key importance, as a brain-machine interface (BMI) that controls a grasping prosthesis could be realized by detecting the time of grasp, together with an optional decoding of which type of grasp to apply. We, therefore, studied the detection of time of grasps from human ECoG recordings during a sequence of natural and continuous reach-to-grasp movements. Using signals recorded from the motor cortex, a detector based on regularized linear discriminant analysis was able to retrieve the time-point of grasp with high reliability and only few false detections. Best performance was achieved using a combination of signal components from time and frequency domains. Sensitivity, measured by the amount of correct detections, and specificity, represented by the amount of false detections, depended strongly on the imposed restrictions on temporal precision of detection and on the delay between event detection and the time the event occurred. Including neural data from after the event into the decoding analysis, slightly increased accuracy, however, reasonable performance could also be obtained when grasping events were detected 125 ms in advance. In summary, our results provide a good basis for using detection of grasping movements from ECoG to control a grasping prosthesis. Public Library of Science 2013-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3554656/ /pubmed/23359537 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054658 Text en © 2013 Pistohl et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pistohl, Tobias
Schmidt, Thomas Sebastian Benedikt
Ball, Tonio
Schulze-Bonhage, Andreas
Aertsen, Ad
Mehring, Carsten
Grasp Detection from Human ECoG during Natural Reach-to-Grasp Movements
title Grasp Detection from Human ECoG during Natural Reach-to-Grasp Movements
title_full Grasp Detection from Human ECoG during Natural Reach-to-Grasp Movements
title_fullStr Grasp Detection from Human ECoG during Natural Reach-to-Grasp Movements
title_full_unstemmed Grasp Detection from Human ECoG during Natural Reach-to-Grasp Movements
title_short Grasp Detection from Human ECoG during Natural Reach-to-Grasp Movements
title_sort grasp detection from human ecog during natural reach-to-grasp movements
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3554656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23359537
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054658
work_keys_str_mv AT pistohltobias graspdetectionfromhumanecogduringnaturalreachtograspmovements
AT schmidtthomassebastianbenedikt graspdetectionfromhumanecogduringnaturalreachtograspmovements
AT balltonio graspdetectionfromhumanecogduringnaturalreachtograspmovements
AT schulzebonhageandreas graspdetectionfromhumanecogduringnaturalreachtograspmovements
AT aertsenad graspdetectionfromhumanecogduringnaturalreachtograspmovements
AT mehringcarsten graspdetectionfromhumanecogduringnaturalreachtograspmovements