Cargando…

Validity of self-reports of knee-straining activities at work: a field study with 6-month follow-up

OBJECTIVES: To measure short-term and long-term validity of self-reported duration of kneeling and squatting at work and to examine the possibility of differential misclassification due to knee complaints. METHODS: Work-related kneeling and squatting were analysed for 190 male subjects (mean age, 35...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ditchen, Dirk M., Ellegast, Rolf P., Hartmann, Bernd, Rieger, Monika A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3555247/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22426541
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00420-012-0758-4
_version_ 1782257017478447104
author Ditchen, Dirk M.
Ellegast, Rolf P.
Hartmann, Bernd
Rieger, Monika A.
author_facet Ditchen, Dirk M.
Ellegast, Rolf P.
Hartmann, Bernd
Rieger, Monika A.
author_sort Ditchen, Dirk M.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To measure short-term and long-term validity of self-reported duration of kneeling and squatting at work and to examine the possibility of differential misclassification due to knee complaints. METHODS: Work-related kneeling and squatting were analysed for 190 male subjects (mean age, 35.0 and SD, 11.5) in field by both measurements and questionnaires. Posture capturing was performed with an ambulatory measuring system (CUELA). Immediately after the measurement (t (0)), each participant was asked to estimate frequency and duration of five specific knee postures taken during the measurement period. After 6 months (t (1)), the survey was repeated (n = 125). Health status of all subjects was recorded by Nordic questionnaire. Statistical analysis was performed by using nonparametric tests, correlations, and Bland–Altman plots. RESULTS: At both time points, subjects were able to recall the occurrence of knee postures rather well (100.0–57.6 % agreement) but many of them failed in quantifying their knee load. We found poor-to-moderate correlations between measurements and self-reports for all examined postures in both surveys (0.23 < ρ < 0.63). The durations of knee postures were both over- and underestimated but overestimations predominated (t (0,) 74.7 % and t (1,) 87.2 % overestimations). High-exposed subjects seemed to misjudge their exposure to a greater extent than low-exposed ones, while knee complaints seemed to have no impact on the assessment behaviour. CONCLUSIONS: As our study showed, self-reported knee loading may deviate widely from measured exposure. These limitations of self-reporting emphasise the arguments in favour of using objective data whenever possible, for example by complementing self-reported occurrence of knee postures with quantitative measurement data. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00420-012-0758-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3555247
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35552472013-01-25 Validity of self-reports of knee-straining activities at work: a field study with 6-month follow-up Ditchen, Dirk M. Ellegast, Rolf P. Hartmann, Bernd Rieger, Monika A. Int Arch Occup Environ Health Original Article OBJECTIVES: To measure short-term and long-term validity of self-reported duration of kneeling and squatting at work and to examine the possibility of differential misclassification due to knee complaints. METHODS: Work-related kneeling and squatting were analysed for 190 male subjects (mean age, 35.0 and SD, 11.5) in field by both measurements and questionnaires. Posture capturing was performed with an ambulatory measuring system (CUELA). Immediately after the measurement (t (0)), each participant was asked to estimate frequency and duration of five specific knee postures taken during the measurement period. After 6 months (t (1)), the survey was repeated (n = 125). Health status of all subjects was recorded by Nordic questionnaire. Statistical analysis was performed by using nonparametric tests, correlations, and Bland–Altman plots. RESULTS: At both time points, subjects were able to recall the occurrence of knee postures rather well (100.0–57.6 % agreement) but many of them failed in quantifying their knee load. We found poor-to-moderate correlations between measurements and self-reports for all examined postures in both surveys (0.23 < ρ < 0.63). The durations of knee postures were both over- and underestimated but overestimations predominated (t (0,) 74.7 % and t (1,) 87.2 % overestimations). High-exposed subjects seemed to misjudge their exposure to a greater extent than low-exposed ones, while knee complaints seemed to have no impact on the assessment behaviour. CONCLUSIONS: As our study showed, self-reported knee loading may deviate widely from measured exposure. These limitations of self-reporting emphasise the arguments in favour of using objective data whenever possible, for example by complementing self-reported occurrence of knee postures with quantitative measurement data. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00420-012-0758-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer-Verlag 2012-03-18 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3555247/ /pubmed/22426541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00420-012-0758-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2012 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ditchen, Dirk M.
Ellegast, Rolf P.
Hartmann, Bernd
Rieger, Monika A.
Validity of self-reports of knee-straining activities at work: a field study with 6-month follow-up
title Validity of self-reports of knee-straining activities at work: a field study with 6-month follow-up
title_full Validity of self-reports of knee-straining activities at work: a field study with 6-month follow-up
title_fullStr Validity of self-reports of knee-straining activities at work: a field study with 6-month follow-up
title_full_unstemmed Validity of self-reports of knee-straining activities at work: a field study with 6-month follow-up
title_short Validity of self-reports of knee-straining activities at work: a field study with 6-month follow-up
title_sort validity of self-reports of knee-straining activities at work: a field study with 6-month follow-up
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3555247/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22426541
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00420-012-0758-4
work_keys_str_mv AT ditchendirkm validityofselfreportsofkneestrainingactivitiesatworkafieldstudywith6monthfollowup
AT ellegastrolfp validityofselfreportsofkneestrainingactivitiesatworkafieldstudywith6monthfollowup
AT hartmannbernd validityofselfreportsofkneestrainingactivitiesatworkafieldstudywith6monthfollowup
AT riegermonikaa validityofselfreportsofkneestrainingactivitiesatworkafieldstudywith6monthfollowup