Cargando…

Evaluating the implementation of health and safety innovations under a regulatory context: A collective case study of Ontario’s safer needle regulation

BACKGROUND: Implementation effectiveness models have identified important factors that can promote the successful implementation of an innovation; however, these models have been examined within contexts where innovations are adopted voluntarily and often ignore the socio-political and environmental...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chambers, Andrea, Mustard, Cameron A, Breslin, Curtis, Holness, Linn, Nichol, Kathryn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3556097/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23339295
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-8-9
_version_ 1782257143805640704
author Chambers, Andrea
Mustard, Cameron A
Breslin, Curtis
Holness, Linn
Nichol, Kathryn
author_facet Chambers, Andrea
Mustard, Cameron A
Breslin, Curtis
Holness, Linn
Nichol, Kathryn
author_sort Chambers, Andrea
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Implementation effectiveness models have identified important factors that can promote the successful implementation of an innovation; however, these models have been examined within contexts where innovations are adopted voluntarily and often ignore the socio-political and environmental context. In the field of occupational health and safety, there are circumstances where organizations must adopt innovations to comply with a regulatory standard. Examining how the external environment can facilitate or challenge an organization’s change process may add to our understanding of implementation effectiveness. The objective of this study is to describe implementation facilitators and barriers in the context of a regulation designed to promote the uptake of safer engineered medical devices in healthcare. METHODS: The proposed study will focus on Ontario’s safer needle regulation (2007) which requires healthcare organizations to transition to the use of safer engineered medical devices for the prevention of needlestick injuries. A collective case study design will be used to learn from the experiences of three acute care hospitals in the province of Ontario, Canada. Interviews with management and front-line healthcare workers and analysis of supporting documents will be used to describe the implementation experience and examine issues associated with the integration of these devices. The data collection and analysis process will be influenced by a conceptual framework that draws from implementation science and the occupational health and safety literature. DISCUSSION: The focus of this study in addition to the methodology creates a unique opportunity to contribute to the field of implementation science. First, the study will explore implementation experiences under circumstances where regulatory pressures are influencing the organization's change process. Second, the timing of this study provides an opportunity to focus on issues that arise during later stages of implementation, a phase during the implementation cycle that has been understudied. This study also provides the opportunity to examine the relevance and utility of current implementation science models in the field of occupational health where the adoption of an innovation is meant to enhance the health and safety of workers. Previous work has tended to focus almost exclusively on innovations that are designed to enhance an organization’s productivity or competitive advantage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3556097
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35560972013-01-31 Evaluating the implementation of health and safety innovations under a regulatory context: A collective case study of Ontario’s safer needle regulation Chambers, Andrea Mustard, Cameron A Breslin, Curtis Holness, Linn Nichol, Kathryn Implement Sci Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Implementation effectiveness models have identified important factors that can promote the successful implementation of an innovation; however, these models have been examined within contexts where innovations are adopted voluntarily and often ignore the socio-political and environmental context. In the field of occupational health and safety, there are circumstances where organizations must adopt innovations to comply with a regulatory standard. Examining how the external environment can facilitate or challenge an organization’s change process may add to our understanding of implementation effectiveness. The objective of this study is to describe implementation facilitators and barriers in the context of a regulation designed to promote the uptake of safer engineered medical devices in healthcare. METHODS: The proposed study will focus on Ontario’s safer needle regulation (2007) which requires healthcare organizations to transition to the use of safer engineered medical devices for the prevention of needlestick injuries. A collective case study design will be used to learn from the experiences of three acute care hospitals in the province of Ontario, Canada. Interviews with management and front-line healthcare workers and analysis of supporting documents will be used to describe the implementation experience and examine issues associated with the integration of these devices. The data collection and analysis process will be influenced by a conceptual framework that draws from implementation science and the occupational health and safety literature. DISCUSSION: The focus of this study in addition to the methodology creates a unique opportunity to contribute to the field of implementation science. First, the study will explore implementation experiences under circumstances where regulatory pressures are influencing the organization's change process. Second, the timing of this study provides an opportunity to focus on issues that arise during later stages of implementation, a phase during the implementation cycle that has been understudied. This study also provides the opportunity to examine the relevance and utility of current implementation science models in the field of occupational health where the adoption of an innovation is meant to enhance the health and safety of workers. Previous work has tended to focus almost exclusively on innovations that are designed to enhance an organization’s productivity or competitive advantage. BioMed Central 2013-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3556097/ /pubmed/23339295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-8-9 Text en Copyright ©2013 Chambers et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Chambers, Andrea
Mustard, Cameron A
Breslin, Curtis
Holness, Linn
Nichol, Kathryn
Evaluating the implementation of health and safety innovations under a regulatory context: A collective case study of Ontario’s safer needle regulation
title Evaluating the implementation of health and safety innovations under a regulatory context: A collective case study of Ontario’s safer needle regulation
title_full Evaluating the implementation of health and safety innovations under a regulatory context: A collective case study of Ontario’s safer needle regulation
title_fullStr Evaluating the implementation of health and safety innovations under a regulatory context: A collective case study of Ontario’s safer needle regulation
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the implementation of health and safety innovations under a regulatory context: A collective case study of Ontario’s safer needle regulation
title_short Evaluating the implementation of health and safety innovations under a regulatory context: A collective case study of Ontario’s safer needle regulation
title_sort evaluating the implementation of health and safety innovations under a regulatory context: a collective case study of ontario’s safer needle regulation
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3556097/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23339295
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-8-9
work_keys_str_mv AT chambersandrea evaluatingtheimplementationofhealthandsafetyinnovationsunderaregulatorycontextacollectivecasestudyofontariossaferneedleregulation
AT mustardcamerona evaluatingtheimplementationofhealthandsafetyinnovationsunderaregulatorycontextacollectivecasestudyofontariossaferneedleregulation
AT breslincurtis evaluatingtheimplementationofhealthandsafetyinnovationsunderaregulatorycontextacollectivecasestudyofontariossaferneedleregulation
AT holnesslinn evaluatingtheimplementationofhealthandsafetyinnovationsunderaregulatorycontextacollectivecasestudyofontariossaferneedleregulation
AT nicholkathryn evaluatingtheimplementationofhealthandsafetyinnovationsunderaregulatorycontextacollectivecasestudyofontariossaferneedleregulation