Cargando…
Comparison of Optimised MDI versus Pumps with or without Sensors in Severe Hypoglycaemia (the Hypo COMPaSS trial)
BACKGROUND: Severe hypoglycaemia (SH) is one of the most feared complications of type 1 diabetes (T1DM) with a reported prevalence of nearly 40%. In randomized trials of Multiple Daily Injections (MDI) and Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion (CSII) therapy there is a possible benefit of CSII in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3556156/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23237320 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6823-12-33 |
_version_ | 1782257158044254208 |
---|---|
author | Little, Stuart Chadwick, Thomas Choudhary, Pratik Brennand, Cath Stickland, Julia Barendse, Shalleen Olateju, Tolulope Leelarathna, Lalantha Walkinshaw, Emma Tan, Horng K Marshall, Sally M Thomas, Reena M Heller, Simon Evans, Mark Kerr, David Flanagan, Daniel Speight, Jane Shaw, James AM |
author_facet | Little, Stuart Chadwick, Thomas Choudhary, Pratik Brennand, Cath Stickland, Julia Barendse, Shalleen Olateju, Tolulope Leelarathna, Lalantha Walkinshaw, Emma Tan, Horng K Marshall, Sally M Thomas, Reena M Heller, Simon Evans, Mark Kerr, David Flanagan, Daniel Speight, Jane Shaw, James AM |
author_sort | Little, Stuart |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Severe hypoglycaemia (SH) is one of the most feared complications of type 1 diabetes (T1DM) with a reported prevalence of nearly 40%. In randomized trials of Multiple Daily Injections (MDI) and Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion (CSII) therapy there is a possible benefit of CSII in reducing SH. However few trials have used basal insulin analogues as the basal insulin in the MDI group and individuals with established SH have often been excluded from prospective studies. In published studies investigating the effect of Real Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring (RT-CGM) benefit in terms of reduced SH has not yet been demonstrated. The primary objective of this study is to elucidate whether in people with T1DM complicated by impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia (IAH), rigorous prevention of biochemical hypoglycaemia using optimized existing self-management technology and educational support will restore awareness and reduce risk of recurrent SH. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a multicentre prospective RCT comparing hypoglycaemia avoidance with optimized MDI and CSII with or without RT-CGM in a 2×2 factorial design in people with type 1 diabetes who have IAH. The primary outcome measure for this study is the difference in IAH (Gold score) at 24 weeks. Secondary outcomes include biomedical measures such as HbA1c, SH incidence, blinded CGM analysis, self monitored blood glucose (SMBG) and response to hypoglycaemia in gold standard clamp studies. Psychosocial measures including well-being and quality of life will also be assessed using several validated and novel measures. Analysis will be on an intention-to-treat basis. DISCUSSION: Most existing RCTs using this study’s interventions have been powered for change in HbA1c rather than IAH or SH. This trial will demonstrate whether IAH can be reversed and SH prevented in people with T1DM in even those at highest risk by using optimized conventional management and existing technology. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN52164803 Eudract No: 2009-015396-27 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3556156 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35561562013-01-31 Comparison of Optimised MDI versus Pumps with or without Sensors in Severe Hypoglycaemia (the Hypo COMPaSS trial) Little, Stuart Chadwick, Thomas Choudhary, Pratik Brennand, Cath Stickland, Julia Barendse, Shalleen Olateju, Tolulope Leelarathna, Lalantha Walkinshaw, Emma Tan, Horng K Marshall, Sally M Thomas, Reena M Heller, Simon Evans, Mark Kerr, David Flanagan, Daniel Speight, Jane Shaw, James AM BMC Endocr Disord Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Severe hypoglycaemia (SH) is one of the most feared complications of type 1 diabetes (T1DM) with a reported prevalence of nearly 40%. In randomized trials of Multiple Daily Injections (MDI) and Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion (CSII) therapy there is a possible benefit of CSII in reducing SH. However few trials have used basal insulin analogues as the basal insulin in the MDI group and individuals with established SH have often been excluded from prospective studies. In published studies investigating the effect of Real Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring (RT-CGM) benefit in terms of reduced SH has not yet been demonstrated. The primary objective of this study is to elucidate whether in people with T1DM complicated by impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia (IAH), rigorous prevention of biochemical hypoglycaemia using optimized existing self-management technology and educational support will restore awareness and reduce risk of recurrent SH. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a multicentre prospective RCT comparing hypoglycaemia avoidance with optimized MDI and CSII with or without RT-CGM in a 2×2 factorial design in people with type 1 diabetes who have IAH. The primary outcome measure for this study is the difference in IAH (Gold score) at 24 weeks. Secondary outcomes include biomedical measures such as HbA1c, SH incidence, blinded CGM analysis, self monitored blood glucose (SMBG) and response to hypoglycaemia in gold standard clamp studies. Psychosocial measures including well-being and quality of life will also be assessed using several validated and novel measures. Analysis will be on an intention-to-treat basis. DISCUSSION: Most existing RCTs using this study’s interventions have been powered for change in HbA1c rather than IAH or SH. This trial will demonstrate whether IAH can be reversed and SH prevented in people with T1DM in even those at highest risk by using optimized conventional management and existing technology. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN52164803 Eudract No: 2009-015396-27 BioMed Central 2012-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3556156/ /pubmed/23237320 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6823-12-33 Text en Copyright ©2012 Little et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Little, Stuart Chadwick, Thomas Choudhary, Pratik Brennand, Cath Stickland, Julia Barendse, Shalleen Olateju, Tolulope Leelarathna, Lalantha Walkinshaw, Emma Tan, Horng K Marshall, Sally M Thomas, Reena M Heller, Simon Evans, Mark Kerr, David Flanagan, Daniel Speight, Jane Shaw, James AM Comparison of Optimised MDI versus Pumps with or without Sensors in Severe Hypoglycaemia (the Hypo COMPaSS trial) |
title | Comparison of Optimised MDI versus Pumps with or without Sensors in Severe Hypoglycaemia (the Hypo COMPaSS trial) |
title_full | Comparison of Optimised MDI versus Pumps with or without Sensors in Severe Hypoglycaemia (the Hypo COMPaSS trial) |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Optimised MDI versus Pumps with or without Sensors in Severe Hypoglycaemia (the Hypo COMPaSS trial) |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Optimised MDI versus Pumps with or without Sensors in Severe Hypoglycaemia (the Hypo COMPaSS trial) |
title_short | Comparison of Optimised MDI versus Pumps with or without Sensors in Severe Hypoglycaemia (the Hypo COMPaSS trial) |
title_sort | comparison of optimised mdi versus pumps with or without sensors in severe hypoglycaemia (the hypo compass trial) |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3556156/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23237320 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6823-12-33 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT littlestuart comparisonofoptimisedmdiversuspumpswithorwithoutsensorsinseverehypoglycaemiathehypocompasstrial AT chadwickthomas comparisonofoptimisedmdiversuspumpswithorwithoutsensorsinseverehypoglycaemiathehypocompasstrial AT choudharypratik comparisonofoptimisedmdiversuspumpswithorwithoutsensorsinseverehypoglycaemiathehypocompasstrial AT brennandcath comparisonofoptimisedmdiversuspumpswithorwithoutsensorsinseverehypoglycaemiathehypocompasstrial AT sticklandjulia comparisonofoptimisedmdiversuspumpswithorwithoutsensorsinseverehypoglycaemiathehypocompasstrial AT barendseshalleen comparisonofoptimisedmdiversuspumpswithorwithoutsensorsinseverehypoglycaemiathehypocompasstrial AT olatejutolulope comparisonofoptimisedmdiversuspumpswithorwithoutsensorsinseverehypoglycaemiathehypocompasstrial AT leelarathnalalantha comparisonofoptimisedmdiversuspumpswithorwithoutsensorsinseverehypoglycaemiathehypocompasstrial AT walkinshawemma comparisonofoptimisedmdiversuspumpswithorwithoutsensorsinseverehypoglycaemiathehypocompasstrial AT tanhorngk comparisonofoptimisedmdiversuspumpswithorwithoutsensorsinseverehypoglycaemiathehypocompasstrial AT marshallsallym comparisonofoptimisedmdiversuspumpswithorwithoutsensorsinseverehypoglycaemiathehypocompasstrial AT thomasreenam comparisonofoptimisedmdiversuspumpswithorwithoutsensorsinseverehypoglycaemiathehypocompasstrial AT hellersimon comparisonofoptimisedmdiversuspumpswithorwithoutsensorsinseverehypoglycaemiathehypocompasstrial AT evansmark comparisonofoptimisedmdiversuspumpswithorwithoutsensorsinseverehypoglycaemiathehypocompasstrial AT kerrdavid comparisonofoptimisedmdiversuspumpswithorwithoutsensorsinseverehypoglycaemiathehypocompasstrial AT flanagandaniel comparisonofoptimisedmdiversuspumpswithorwithoutsensorsinseverehypoglycaemiathehypocompasstrial AT speightjane comparisonofoptimisedmdiversuspumpswithorwithoutsensorsinseverehypoglycaemiathehypocompasstrial AT shawjamesam comparisonofoptimisedmdiversuspumpswithorwithoutsensorsinseverehypoglycaemiathehypocompasstrial |