Cargando…
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Celiac Plexus Neurolysis in Pancreatic Cancer: A Prospective Pilot Study of Safety Using 10 mL versus 20 mL Alcohol
Background. The dose of alcohol used in EUS-CPN is not standardized. The objective was to compare the safety of 20 mL alcohol versus 10 mL alcohol during EUS-CPN for patients with pancreatic cancer-related pain. Methods. 20 patients were selected to receive 10 mL or 20 mL of alcohol during EUS-CPN....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3556397/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23365492 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/327036 |
_version_ | 1782257175641456640 |
---|---|
author | LeBlanc, Julia K. Rawl, Susan Juan, Michelle Johnson, Cynthia Kroenke, Kurt McHenry, Lee Sherman, Stuart McGreevy, Kathy Al-Haddad, Mohammad DeWitt, John |
author_facet | LeBlanc, Julia K. Rawl, Susan Juan, Michelle Johnson, Cynthia Kroenke, Kurt McHenry, Lee Sherman, Stuart McGreevy, Kathy Al-Haddad, Mohammad DeWitt, John |
author_sort | LeBlanc, Julia K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background. The dose of alcohol used in EUS-CPN is not standardized. The objective was to compare the safety of 20 mL alcohol versus 10 mL alcohol during EUS-CPN for patients with pancreatic cancer-related pain. Methods. 20 patients were selected to receive 10 mL or 20 mL of alcohol during EUS-CPN. Followup was done at baseline, 24 hours, and weekly. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was assessed at baseline, week 2, week 4, and every 4 weeks thereafter until pain returned. Results. There were no major complications in both groups. Minor self-limited adverse effects were seen in 6 (30%) subjects and included lightheadedness in 1 (5%), transient diarrhea in 2 (10%), and transient nausea and vomiting in 3. Pain relief was similar in both groups: 80% in the 10 mL group and 100% in the 20 mL group (P = 0.21). The mean (± SD) duration of pain relief in the 10 mL and 20 mL groups was 7.9 ± 10.8 and 8.4 ± 9.2 weeks, respectively. 30% of patients in each group had complete pain relief. Conclusions. EUS-CPN using 20 mL of alcohol is safe. Similar clinical outcomes were seen in both groups. Further investigations to confirm these findings are warranted. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3556397 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35563972013-01-30 Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Celiac Plexus Neurolysis in Pancreatic Cancer: A Prospective Pilot Study of Safety Using 10 mL versus 20 mL Alcohol LeBlanc, Julia K. Rawl, Susan Juan, Michelle Johnson, Cynthia Kroenke, Kurt McHenry, Lee Sherman, Stuart McGreevy, Kathy Al-Haddad, Mohammad DeWitt, John Diagn Ther Endosc Clinical Study Background. The dose of alcohol used in EUS-CPN is not standardized. The objective was to compare the safety of 20 mL alcohol versus 10 mL alcohol during EUS-CPN for patients with pancreatic cancer-related pain. Methods. 20 patients were selected to receive 10 mL or 20 mL of alcohol during EUS-CPN. Followup was done at baseline, 24 hours, and weekly. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was assessed at baseline, week 2, week 4, and every 4 weeks thereafter until pain returned. Results. There were no major complications in both groups. Minor self-limited adverse effects were seen in 6 (30%) subjects and included lightheadedness in 1 (5%), transient diarrhea in 2 (10%), and transient nausea and vomiting in 3. Pain relief was similar in both groups: 80% in the 10 mL group and 100% in the 20 mL group (P = 0.21). The mean (± SD) duration of pain relief in the 10 mL and 20 mL groups was 7.9 ± 10.8 and 8.4 ± 9.2 weeks, respectively. 30% of patients in each group had complete pain relief. Conclusions. EUS-CPN using 20 mL of alcohol is safe. Similar clinical outcomes were seen in both groups. Further investigations to confirm these findings are warranted. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013 2013-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3556397/ /pubmed/23365492 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/327036 Text en Copyright © 2013 Julia K. LeBlanc et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study LeBlanc, Julia K. Rawl, Susan Juan, Michelle Johnson, Cynthia Kroenke, Kurt McHenry, Lee Sherman, Stuart McGreevy, Kathy Al-Haddad, Mohammad DeWitt, John Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Celiac Plexus Neurolysis in Pancreatic Cancer: A Prospective Pilot Study of Safety Using 10 mL versus 20 mL Alcohol |
title | Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Celiac Plexus Neurolysis in Pancreatic Cancer: A Prospective Pilot Study of Safety Using 10 mL versus 20 mL Alcohol |
title_full | Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Celiac Plexus Neurolysis in Pancreatic Cancer: A Prospective Pilot Study of Safety Using 10 mL versus 20 mL Alcohol |
title_fullStr | Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Celiac Plexus Neurolysis in Pancreatic Cancer: A Prospective Pilot Study of Safety Using 10 mL versus 20 mL Alcohol |
title_full_unstemmed | Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Celiac Plexus Neurolysis in Pancreatic Cancer: A Prospective Pilot Study of Safety Using 10 mL versus 20 mL Alcohol |
title_short | Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Celiac Plexus Neurolysis in Pancreatic Cancer: A Prospective Pilot Study of Safety Using 10 mL versus 20 mL Alcohol |
title_sort | endoscopic ultrasound-guided celiac plexus neurolysis in pancreatic cancer: a prospective pilot study of safety using 10 ml versus 20 ml alcohol |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3556397/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23365492 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/327036 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leblancjuliak endoscopicultrasoundguidedceliacplexusneurolysisinpancreaticcanceraprospectivepilotstudyofsafetyusing10mlversus20mlalcohol AT rawlsusan endoscopicultrasoundguidedceliacplexusneurolysisinpancreaticcanceraprospectivepilotstudyofsafetyusing10mlversus20mlalcohol AT juanmichelle endoscopicultrasoundguidedceliacplexusneurolysisinpancreaticcanceraprospectivepilotstudyofsafetyusing10mlversus20mlalcohol AT johnsoncynthia endoscopicultrasoundguidedceliacplexusneurolysisinpancreaticcanceraprospectivepilotstudyofsafetyusing10mlversus20mlalcohol AT kroenkekurt endoscopicultrasoundguidedceliacplexusneurolysisinpancreaticcanceraprospectivepilotstudyofsafetyusing10mlversus20mlalcohol AT mchenrylee endoscopicultrasoundguidedceliacplexusneurolysisinpancreaticcanceraprospectivepilotstudyofsafetyusing10mlversus20mlalcohol AT shermanstuart endoscopicultrasoundguidedceliacplexusneurolysisinpancreaticcanceraprospectivepilotstudyofsafetyusing10mlversus20mlalcohol AT mcgreevykathy endoscopicultrasoundguidedceliacplexusneurolysisinpancreaticcanceraprospectivepilotstudyofsafetyusing10mlversus20mlalcohol AT alhaddadmohammad endoscopicultrasoundguidedceliacplexusneurolysisinpancreaticcanceraprospectivepilotstudyofsafetyusing10mlversus20mlalcohol AT dewittjohn endoscopicultrasoundguidedceliacplexusneurolysisinpancreaticcanceraprospectivepilotstudyofsafetyusing10mlversus20mlalcohol |