Cargando…
Analysis of Pregnancy Outcomes Using the New IADPSG Recommendation Compared with the Carpenter and Coustan Criteria in an Area with a Low Prevalence of Gestational Diabetes
Aims. This paper aims to evaluate characteristics and pregnancy outcomes in women prior classified normal by Carpenter and Coustan criteria (old criteria) and now gestational diabetes (GDM) by the IADPSG criteria. Methods. Retrospective analysis of 6727 pregnancies is used. Using the old criteria, 2...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3556446/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23365571 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/248121 |
_version_ | 1782257187231367168 |
---|---|
author | Benhalima, Katrien Hanssens, Myriam Devlieger, Roland Verhaeghe, Johan Mathieu, Chantal |
author_facet | Benhalima, Katrien Hanssens, Myriam Devlieger, Roland Verhaeghe, Johan Mathieu, Chantal |
author_sort | Benhalima, Katrien |
collection | PubMed |
description | Aims. This paper aims to evaluate characteristics and pregnancy outcomes in women prior classified normal by Carpenter and Coustan criteria (old criteria) and now gestational diabetes (GDM) by the IADPSG criteria. Methods. Retrospective analysis of 6727 pregnancies is used. Using the old criteria, 222 had GDM (old GDM). Using the IADPSG criteria, 382 had GDM of which 160 had a normal glucose tolerance with the old criteria (new GDM). We compared the new GDM group with the old GDM group and women with normal glucose tolerance with both criteria (NGT group, 6345). Results. New GDM women were younger (31.6 ± 4.7 versus 33.3 ± 7.2 years, P = 0.010) than old GDM women. Caesarean section was performed in 30.5% of new GDM, in 32.4% of old GDM (P = 0.706), and in 23.3% of NGT women (P = 0.001). Large for gestational age occurred in 10.8% of new GDM, in 13.8% of old GDM (P = 0.473), and in 9.0% of NGT women (P = 0.099). Shoulder dystocia occurred in 3.9% of new GDM, in 3.2% of old GDM (P = 0.736), and in 1.4% of NGT women (P = 0.007). Conclusion. Using the IADPSG criteria, more women are identified as having GDM, and these women carry an increased risk for adverse gestational outcome compared to women without GDM. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3556446 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35564462013-01-30 Analysis of Pregnancy Outcomes Using the New IADPSG Recommendation Compared with the Carpenter and Coustan Criteria in an Area with a Low Prevalence of Gestational Diabetes Benhalima, Katrien Hanssens, Myriam Devlieger, Roland Verhaeghe, Johan Mathieu, Chantal Int J Endocrinol Research Article Aims. This paper aims to evaluate characteristics and pregnancy outcomes in women prior classified normal by Carpenter and Coustan criteria (old criteria) and now gestational diabetes (GDM) by the IADPSG criteria. Methods. Retrospective analysis of 6727 pregnancies is used. Using the old criteria, 222 had GDM (old GDM). Using the IADPSG criteria, 382 had GDM of which 160 had a normal glucose tolerance with the old criteria (new GDM). We compared the new GDM group with the old GDM group and women with normal glucose tolerance with both criteria (NGT group, 6345). Results. New GDM women were younger (31.6 ± 4.7 versus 33.3 ± 7.2 years, P = 0.010) than old GDM women. Caesarean section was performed in 30.5% of new GDM, in 32.4% of old GDM (P = 0.706), and in 23.3% of NGT women (P = 0.001). Large for gestational age occurred in 10.8% of new GDM, in 13.8% of old GDM (P = 0.473), and in 9.0% of NGT women (P = 0.099). Shoulder dystocia occurred in 3.9% of new GDM, in 3.2% of old GDM (P = 0.736), and in 1.4% of NGT women (P = 0.007). Conclusion. Using the IADPSG criteria, more women are identified as having GDM, and these women carry an increased risk for adverse gestational outcome compared to women without GDM. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013 2013-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3556446/ /pubmed/23365571 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/248121 Text en Copyright © 2013 Katrien Benhalima et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Benhalima, Katrien Hanssens, Myriam Devlieger, Roland Verhaeghe, Johan Mathieu, Chantal Analysis of Pregnancy Outcomes Using the New IADPSG Recommendation Compared with the Carpenter and Coustan Criteria in an Area with a Low Prevalence of Gestational Diabetes |
title | Analysis of Pregnancy Outcomes Using the New IADPSG Recommendation Compared with the Carpenter and Coustan Criteria in an Area with a Low Prevalence of Gestational Diabetes |
title_full | Analysis of Pregnancy Outcomes Using the New IADPSG Recommendation Compared with the Carpenter and Coustan Criteria in an Area with a Low Prevalence of Gestational Diabetes |
title_fullStr | Analysis of Pregnancy Outcomes Using the New IADPSG Recommendation Compared with the Carpenter and Coustan Criteria in an Area with a Low Prevalence of Gestational Diabetes |
title_full_unstemmed | Analysis of Pregnancy Outcomes Using the New IADPSG Recommendation Compared with the Carpenter and Coustan Criteria in an Area with a Low Prevalence of Gestational Diabetes |
title_short | Analysis of Pregnancy Outcomes Using the New IADPSG Recommendation Compared with the Carpenter and Coustan Criteria in an Area with a Low Prevalence of Gestational Diabetes |
title_sort | analysis of pregnancy outcomes using the new iadpsg recommendation compared with the carpenter and coustan criteria in an area with a low prevalence of gestational diabetes |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3556446/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23365571 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/248121 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT benhalimakatrien analysisofpregnancyoutcomesusingthenewiadpsgrecommendationcomparedwiththecarpenterandcoustancriteriainanareawithalowprevalenceofgestationaldiabetes AT hanssensmyriam analysisofpregnancyoutcomesusingthenewiadpsgrecommendationcomparedwiththecarpenterandcoustancriteriainanareawithalowprevalenceofgestationaldiabetes AT devliegerroland analysisofpregnancyoutcomesusingthenewiadpsgrecommendationcomparedwiththecarpenterandcoustancriteriainanareawithalowprevalenceofgestationaldiabetes AT verhaeghejohan analysisofpregnancyoutcomesusingthenewiadpsgrecommendationcomparedwiththecarpenterandcoustancriteriainanareawithalowprevalenceofgestationaldiabetes AT mathieuchantal analysisofpregnancyoutcomesusingthenewiadpsgrecommendationcomparedwiththecarpenterandcoustancriteriainanareawithalowprevalenceofgestationaldiabetes |