Cargando…

The ABC of tDCS: Effects of Anodal, Bilateral and Cathodal Montages of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Patients with Stroke—A Pilot Study

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a noninvasive technique that is emerging as a prospective therapy for different neurologic disorders. Previous studies have demonstrated that anodal and cathodal stimulation can improve motor performance in terms of dexterity and manual force. The ob...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fusco, A., De Angelis, D., Morone, G., Maglione, L., Paolucci, T., Bragoni, M., Venturiero, V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3556891/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23365790
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/837595
_version_ 1782257254432505856
author Fusco, A.
De Angelis, D.
Morone, G.
Maglione, L.
Paolucci, T.
Bragoni, M.
Venturiero, V.
author_facet Fusco, A.
De Angelis, D.
Morone, G.
Maglione, L.
Paolucci, T.
Bragoni, M.
Venturiero, V.
author_sort Fusco, A.
collection PubMed
description Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a noninvasive technique that is emerging as a prospective therapy for different neurologic disorders. Previous studies have demonstrated that anodal and cathodal stimulation can improve motor performance in terms of dexterity and manual force. The objective of this study was to determine whether different electrodes' setups (anodal, cathodal, and simultaneous bilateral tDCS) provide different motor performance and which montage was more effective. As secondary outcome, we have asked to the patients about their satisfaction, and to determine if the bilateral tDCS was more uncomfortable than unilateral tDCS. Nine patients with stroke in subacute phase were enrolled in this study and randomly divided in three groups. Our results showed that tDCS was an effective treatment if compared to Sham stimulation (P = 0.022). In particular, anodal stimulation provided the higher improvement in terms of manual dexterity. Cathodal stimulation seemed to have a little effect in terms of force improvement, not observed with other setups. Bipolar stimulation seemed to be the less effective. No significant differences have been noted for the different set-ups for patients' judgment. These results highlight the potential efficacy of tDCS for patients with stroke in subacute phase.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3556891
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35568912013-01-30 The ABC of tDCS: Effects of Anodal, Bilateral and Cathodal Montages of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Patients with Stroke—A Pilot Study Fusco, A. De Angelis, D. Morone, G. Maglione, L. Paolucci, T. Bragoni, M. Venturiero, V. Stroke Res Treat Clinical Study Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a noninvasive technique that is emerging as a prospective therapy for different neurologic disorders. Previous studies have demonstrated that anodal and cathodal stimulation can improve motor performance in terms of dexterity and manual force. The objective of this study was to determine whether different electrodes' setups (anodal, cathodal, and simultaneous bilateral tDCS) provide different motor performance and which montage was more effective. As secondary outcome, we have asked to the patients about their satisfaction, and to determine if the bilateral tDCS was more uncomfortable than unilateral tDCS. Nine patients with stroke in subacute phase were enrolled in this study and randomly divided in three groups. Our results showed that tDCS was an effective treatment if compared to Sham stimulation (P = 0.022). In particular, anodal stimulation provided the higher improvement in terms of manual dexterity. Cathodal stimulation seemed to have a little effect in terms of force improvement, not observed with other setups. Bipolar stimulation seemed to be the less effective. No significant differences have been noted for the different set-ups for patients' judgment. These results highlight the potential efficacy of tDCS for patients with stroke in subacute phase. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013 2013-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3556891/ /pubmed/23365790 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/837595 Text en Copyright © 2013 A. Fusco et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Fusco, A.
De Angelis, D.
Morone, G.
Maglione, L.
Paolucci, T.
Bragoni, M.
Venturiero, V.
The ABC of tDCS: Effects of Anodal, Bilateral and Cathodal Montages of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Patients with Stroke—A Pilot Study
title The ABC of tDCS: Effects of Anodal, Bilateral and Cathodal Montages of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Patients with Stroke—A Pilot Study
title_full The ABC of tDCS: Effects of Anodal, Bilateral and Cathodal Montages of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Patients with Stroke—A Pilot Study
title_fullStr The ABC of tDCS: Effects of Anodal, Bilateral and Cathodal Montages of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Patients with Stroke—A Pilot Study
title_full_unstemmed The ABC of tDCS: Effects of Anodal, Bilateral and Cathodal Montages of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Patients with Stroke—A Pilot Study
title_short The ABC of tDCS: Effects of Anodal, Bilateral and Cathodal Montages of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Patients with Stroke—A Pilot Study
title_sort abc of tdcs: effects of anodal, bilateral and cathodal montages of transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with stroke—a pilot study
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3556891/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23365790
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/837595
work_keys_str_mv AT fuscoa theabcoftdcseffectsofanodalbilateralandcathodalmontagesoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinpatientswithstrokeapilotstudy
AT deangelisd theabcoftdcseffectsofanodalbilateralandcathodalmontagesoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinpatientswithstrokeapilotstudy
AT moroneg theabcoftdcseffectsofanodalbilateralandcathodalmontagesoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinpatientswithstrokeapilotstudy
AT maglionel theabcoftdcseffectsofanodalbilateralandcathodalmontagesoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinpatientswithstrokeapilotstudy
AT paoluccit theabcoftdcseffectsofanodalbilateralandcathodalmontagesoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinpatientswithstrokeapilotstudy
AT bragonim theabcoftdcseffectsofanodalbilateralandcathodalmontagesoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinpatientswithstrokeapilotstudy
AT venturierov theabcoftdcseffectsofanodalbilateralandcathodalmontagesoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinpatientswithstrokeapilotstudy
AT fuscoa abcoftdcseffectsofanodalbilateralandcathodalmontagesoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinpatientswithstrokeapilotstudy
AT deangelisd abcoftdcseffectsofanodalbilateralandcathodalmontagesoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinpatientswithstrokeapilotstudy
AT moroneg abcoftdcseffectsofanodalbilateralandcathodalmontagesoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinpatientswithstrokeapilotstudy
AT maglionel abcoftdcseffectsofanodalbilateralandcathodalmontagesoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinpatientswithstrokeapilotstudy
AT paoluccit abcoftdcseffectsofanodalbilateralandcathodalmontagesoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinpatientswithstrokeapilotstudy
AT bragonim abcoftdcseffectsofanodalbilateralandcathodalmontagesoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinpatientswithstrokeapilotstudy
AT venturierov abcoftdcseffectsofanodalbilateralandcathodalmontagesoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinpatientswithstrokeapilotstudy