Cargando…

Synchronous Comparison of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Epidemiology Strains by “MIRU-VNTR” and “MIRU-VNTR and Spoligotyping” Technique

Molecular epidemiology analyses are frequently used in determining epidemiology of tuberculosis. Recently, Mycobacterial Interspersed Repetitive Unit Variable Number Tandem Repeat (MIRU-VNTR) and Spoligotyping has become an important method, as it allows high-through put, discriminatory and reproduc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jafarian, Mehdi, Aghali-Merza, Muayed, Farnia, Parissa, Ahmadi, Mojtaba, Masjedi, Mohammad Reza, Velayati, Ali Akbar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Avicenna Research Institute 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3558156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23408229
_version_ 1782257383153598464
author Jafarian, Mehdi
Aghali-Merza, Muayed
Farnia, Parissa
Ahmadi, Mojtaba
Masjedi, Mohammad Reza
Velayati, Ali Akbar
author_facet Jafarian, Mehdi
Aghali-Merza, Muayed
Farnia, Parissa
Ahmadi, Mojtaba
Masjedi, Mohammad Reza
Velayati, Ali Akbar
author_sort Jafarian, Mehdi
collection PubMed
description Molecular epidemiology analyses are frequently used in determining epidemiology of tuberculosis. Recently, Mycobacterial Interspersed Repetitive Unit Variable Number Tandem Repeat (MIRU-VNTR) and Spoligotyping has become an important method, as it allows high-through put, discriminatory and reproducible analysis of clinical isolate. The purpose of this study is to compare techniques of “MIRU-VNTR” versus “MIRU-VNTR and Spoligotyping” together for study of genetic pattern of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tuberculosis) strains. Sixty M. tuberculosis (MTB) isolates were selected (30 susceptible, 30 multi-drug resistant) for this study. Thereafter, the “MIRU-VNTR and Spoligotyping” were performed to identify their genetic patterns. The frequency of unknown genetic pattern of MTB was compared using technique of “MIRU-VNTR” alone versus “MIRU-VNTR and Spoligotyping” together. The MIRU-VNTR allelic diversity at each of the loci was calculated by Hunter – Gaston Discriminatory Index (HGDI). Based on differentiation index of all strains 10, 16, 26, 31 and 40 loci were identified as the most distinctive (HGI ≥0.6) and 2, 4, 20 and 24 as the weakest distinctive locus (HGI ≤0.3). By using MIRU-VNTR technique 38% (n = 23) of isolates could not be typed, whereas by applying “MIRU-VNTR and Spoligotyping” together only 15% (n = 9) of isolates remained unknown (p = 0.004). For sensitive strains, the difference was significant (67% vs. 90%, p = 0.028), but only marginally significant for drug resistant strains (57% vs. 80%, p = 0.052). The discrimination power of 12-locus MIRU-VNTR and Spoligotyping was equal to that of MIRU-VNTR analysis. If appropriate loci are added to the standard MIRU analysis, MIRU-VNTR genotyping could be a valuable tool for strain typing and epidemiological research of M. tuberculosis. With this approach a more clear understanding about genetic pattern of MTB can be achieved.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3558156
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Avicenna Research Institute
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35581562013-02-13 Synchronous Comparison of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Epidemiology Strains by “MIRU-VNTR” and “MIRU-VNTR and Spoligotyping” Technique Jafarian, Mehdi Aghali-Merza, Muayed Farnia, Parissa Ahmadi, Mojtaba Masjedi, Mohammad Reza Velayati, Ali Akbar Avicenna J Med Biotechnol Original Article Molecular epidemiology analyses are frequently used in determining epidemiology of tuberculosis. Recently, Mycobacterial Interspersed Repetitive Unit Variable Number Tandem Repeat (MIRU-VNTR) and Spoligotyping has become an important method, as it allows high-through put, discriminatory and reproducible analysis of clinical isolate. The purpose of this study is to compare techniques of “MIRU-VNTR” versus “MIRU-VNTR and Spoligotyping” together for study of genetic pattern of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tuberculosis) strains. Sixty M. tuberculosis (MTB) isolates were selected (30 susceptible, 30 multi-drug resistant) for this study. Thereafter, the “MIRU-VNTR and Spoligotyping” were performed to identify their genetic patterns. The frequency of unknown genetic pattern of MTB was compared using technique of “MIRU-VNTR” alone versus “MIRU-VNTR and Spoligotyping” together. The MIRU-VNTR allelic diversity at each of the loci was calculated by Hunter – Gaston Discriminatory Index (HGDI). Based on differentiation index of all strains 10, 16, 26, 31 and 40 loci were identified as the most distinctive (HGI ≥0.6) and 2, 4, 20 and 24 as the weakest distinctive locus (HGI ≤0.3). By using MIRU-VNTR technique 38% (n = 23) of isolates could not be typed, whereas by applying “MIRU-VNTR and Spoligotyping” together only 15% (n = 9) of isolates remained unknown (p = 0.004). For sensitive strains, the difference was significant (67% vs. 90%, p = 0.028), but only marginally significant for drug resistant strains (57% vs. 80%, p = 0.052). The discrimination power of 12-locus MIRU-VNTR and Spoligotyping was equal to that of MIRU-VNTR analysis. If appropriate loci are added to the standard MIRU analysis, MIRU-VNTR genotyping could be a valuable tool for strain typing and epidemiological research of M. tuberculosis. With this approach a more clear understanding about genetic pattern of MTB can be achieved. Avicenna Research Institute 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC3558156/ /pubmed/23408229 Text en Copyright © 2010 Avicenna Research Institute http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.
spellingShingle Original Article
Jafarian, Mehdi
Aghali-Merza, Muayed
Farnia, Parissa
Ahmadi, Mojtaba
Masjedi, Mohammad Reza
Velayati, Ali Akbar
Synchronous Comparison of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Epidemiology Strains by “MIRU-VNTR” and “MIRU-VNTR and Spoligotyping” Technique
title Synchronous Comparison of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Epidemiology Strains by “MIRU-VNTR” and “MIRU-VNTR and Spoligotyping” Technique
title_full Synchronous Comparison of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Epidemiology Strains by “MIRU-VNTR” and “MIRU-VNTR and Spoligotyping” Technique
title_fullStr Synchronous Comparison of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Epidemiology Strains by “MIRU-VNTR” and “MIRU-VNTR and Spoligotyping” Technique
title_full_unstemmed Synchronous Comparison of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Epidemiology Strains by “MIRU-VNTR” and “MIRU-VNTR and Spoligotyping” Technique
title_short Synchronous Comparison of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Epidemiology Strains by “MIRU-VNTR” and “MIRU-VNTR and Spoligotyping” Technique
title_sort synchronous comparison of mycobacterium tuberculosis epidemiology strains by “miru-vntr” and “miru-vntr and spoligotyping” technique
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3558156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23408229
work_keys_str_mv AT jafarianmehdi synchronouscomparisonofmycobacteriumtuberculosisepidemiologystrainsbymiruvntrandmiruvntrandspoligotypingtechnique
AT aghalimerzamuayed synchronouscomparisonofmycobacteriumtuberculosisepidemiologystrainsbymiruvntrandmiruvntrandspoligotypingtechnique
AT farniaparissa synchronouscomparisonofmycobacteriumtuberculosisepidemiologystrainsbymiruvntrandmiruvntrandspoligotypingtechnique
AT ahmadimojtaba synchronouscomparisonofmycobacteriumtuberculosisepidemiologystrainsbymiruvntrandmiruvntrandspoligotypingtechnique
AT masjedimohammadreza synchronouscomparisonofmycobacteriumtuberculosisepidemiologystrainsbymiruvntrandmiruvntrandspoligotypingtechnique
AT velayatialiakbar synchronouscomparisonofmycobacteriumtuberculosisepidemiologystrainsbymiruvntrandmiruvntrandspoligotypingtechnique