Cargando…

The negative affect repair questionnaire: factor analysis and psychometric evaluation in three samples

BACKGROUND: Negative affect and difficulties in its regulation have been connected to several adverse psychological consequences. While several questionnaires exist, it would be important to have a theory-based measure that includes clinically relevant items and shows good psychometric properties in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scherer, Anne, Eberle, Nicole, Boecker, Maren, Vögele, Claus, Gauggel, Siegfried, Forkmann, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3558324/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23302222
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-13-16
_version_ 1782257409420427264
author Scherer, Anne
Eberle, Nicole
Boecker, Maren
Vögele, Claus
Gauggel, Siegfried
Forkmann, Thomas
author_facet Scherer, Anne
Eberle, Nicole
Boecker, Maren
Vögele, Claus
Gauggel, Siegfried
Forkmann, Thomas
author_sort Scherer, Anne
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Negative affect and difficulties in its regulation have been connected to several adverse psychological consequences. While several questionnaires exist, it would be important to have a theory-based measure that includes clinically relevant items and shows good psychometric properties in healthy and patient samples. This study aims at developing such a questionnaire, combining the two Gross [1] scales Reappraisal and Suppression with an additional response-focused scale called Externalizing Behavioral Strategies covering clinically relevant items. METHODS: The samples consisted of 684 students (mean age = 23.3, SD = 3.5; 53.6% female) and 369 persons with mixed mental disorders (mean age = 36.0 SD = 14.6; 71.2% female). Items for the questionnaire were derived from existing questionnaires and additional items were formulated based on suggestions by clinical experts. All items start with “When I don’t feel well, in order to feel better…”. Participants rated how frequently they used each strategy on a 5-point Likert scale. Confirmatory Factor Analyses were conducted to verify the factor structure in two separate student samples and a clinical sample. Group comparisons and correlations with other questionnaires were calculated to ensure validity. RESULTS: After modification, the CFA showed good model fit in all three samples. Reliability scores (Cronbach’s α) for the three NARQ scales ranged between .71 and .80. Comparisons between students and persons with mental disorders showed the postulated relationships, as did comparisons between male and female students and persons with or without Borderline Personality Disorder. Correlations with other questionnaires suggest the NARQ’s construct validity. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that the NARQ is a psychometrically sound and reliable measure with practical use for therapy planning and tracking of treatment outcome across time. We advocate the integration of the new response-focused strategy in the Gross’s model of emotion regulation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3558324
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35583242013-01-31 The negative affect repair questionnaire: factor analysis and psychometric evaluation in three samples Scherer, Anne Eberle, Nicole Boecker, Maren Vögele, Claus Gauggel, Siegfried Forkmann, Thomas BMC Psychiatry Research Article BACKGROUND: Negative affect and difficulties in its regulation have been connected to several adverse psychological consequences. While several questionnaires exist, it would be important to have a theory-based measure that includes clinically relevant items and shows good psychometric properties in healthy and patient samples. This study aims at developing such a questionnaire, combining the two Gross [1] scales Reappraisal and Suppression with an additional response-focused scale called Externalizing Behavioral Strategies covering clinically relevant items. METHODS: The samples consisted of 684 students (mean age = 23.3, SD = 3.5; 53.6% female) and 369 persons with mixed mental disorders (mean age = 36.0 SD = 14.6; 71.2% female). Items for the questionnaire were derived from existing questionnaires and additional items were formulated based on suggestions by clinical experts. All items start with “When I don’t feel well, in order to feel better…”. Participants rated how frequently they used each strategy on a 5-point Likert scale. Confirmatory Factor Analyses were conducted to verify the factor structure in two separate student samples and a clinical sample. Group comparisons and correlations with other questionnaires were calculated to ensure validity. RESULTS: After modification, the CFA showed good model fit in all three samples. Reliability scores (Cronbach’s α) for the three NARQ scales ranged between .71 and .80. Comparisons between students and persons with mental disorders showed the postulated relationships, as did comparisons between male and female students and persons with or without Borderline Personality Disorder. Correlations with other questionnaires suggest the NARQ’s construct validity. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that the NARQ is a psychometrically sound and reliable measure with practical use for therapy planning and tracking of treatment outcome across time. We advocate the integration of the new response-focused strategy in the Gross’s model of emotion regulation. BioMed Central 2013-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3558324/ /pubmed/23302222 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-13-16 Text en Copyright ©2013 Scherer et al.; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Scherer, Anne
Eberle, Nicole
Boecker, Maren
Vögele, Claus
Gauggel, Siegfried
Forkmann, Thomas
The negative affect repair questionnaire: factor analysis and psychometric evaluation in three samples
title The negative affect repair questionnaire: factor analysis and psychometric evaluation in three samples
title_full The negative affect repair questionnaire: factor analysis and psychometric evaluation in three samples
title_fullStr The negative affect repair questionnaire: factor analysis and psychometric evaluation in three samples
title_full_unstemmed The negative affect repair questionnaire: factor analysis and psychometric evaluation in three samples
title_short The negative affect repair questionnaire: factor analysis and psychometric evaluation in three samples
title_sort negative affect repair questionnaire: factor analysis and psychometric evaluation in three samples
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3558324/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23302222
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-13-16
work_keys_str_mv AT schereranne thenegativeaffectrepairquestionnairefactoranalysisandpsychometricevaluationinthreesamples
AT eberlenicole thenegativeaffectrepairquestionnairefactoranalysisandpsychometricevaluationinthreesamples
AT boeckermaren thenegativeaffectrepairquestionnairefactoranalysisandpsychometricevaluationinthreesamples
AT vogeleclaus thenegativeaffectrepairquestionnairefactoranalysisandpsychometricevaluationinthreesamples
AT gauggelsiegfried thenegativeaffectrepairquestionnairefactoranalysisandpsychometricevaluationinthreesamples
AT forkmannthomas thenegativeaffectrepairquestionnairefactoranalysisandpsychometricevaluationinthreesamples
AT schereranne negativeaffectrepairquestionnairefactoranalysisandpsychometricevaluationinthreesamples
AT eberlenicole negativeaffectrepairquestionnairefactoranalysisandpsychometricevaluationinthreesamples
AT boeckermaren negativeaffectrepairquestionnairefactoranalysisandpsychometricevaluationinthreesamples
AT vogeleclaus negativeaffectrepairquestionnairefactoranalysisandpsychometricevaluationinthreesamples
AT gauggelsiegfried negativeaffectrepairquestionnairefactoranalysisandpsychometricevaluationinthreesamples
AT forkmannthomas negativeaffectrepairquestionnairefactoranalysisandpsychometricevaluationinthreesamples