Cargando…

RAMESES publication standards: meta-narrative reviews

BACKGROUND: Meta-narrative review is one of an emerging menu of new approaches to qualitative and mixed-method systematic review. A meta-narrative review seeks to illuminate a heterogeneous topic area by highlighting the contrasting and complementary ways in which researchers have studied the same o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wong, Geoff, Greenhalgh, Trish, Westhorp, Gill, Buckingham, Jeanette, Pawson, Ray
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3558334/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23360661
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-11-20
_version_ 1782257411774480384
author Wong, Geoff
Greenhalgh, Trish
Westhorp, Gill
Buckingham, Jeanette
Pawson, Ray
author_facet Wong, Geoff
Greenhalgh, Trish
Westhorp, Gill
Buckingham, Jeanette
Pawson, Ray
author_sort Wong, Geoff
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Meta-narrative review is one of an emerging menu of new approaches to qualitative and mixed-method systematic review. A meta-narrative review seeks to illuminate a heterogeneous topic area by highlighting the contrasting and complementary ways in which researchers have studied the same or a similar topic. No previous publication standards exist for the reporting of meta-narrative reviews. This publication standard was developed as part of the RAMESES (Realist And MEta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards) project. The project's aim is to produce preliminary publication standards for meta-narrative reviews. METHODS: We (a) collated and summarized existing literature on the principles of good practice in meta-narrative reviews; (b) considered the extent to which these principles had been followed by published reviews, thereby identifying how rigor may be lost and how existing methods could be improved; (c) used a three-round online Delphi method with an interdisciplinary panel of national and international experts in evidence synthesis, meta-narrative reviews, policy and/or publishing to produce and iteratively refine a draft set of methodological steps and publication standards; (d) provided real-time support to ongoing meta-narrative reviews and the open-access RAMESES online discussion list so as to capture problems and questions as they arose; and (e) synthesized expert input, evidence review and real-time problem analysis into a definitive set of standards. RESULTS: We identified nine published meta-narrative reviews, provided real-time support to four ongoing reviews and captured questions raised in the RAMESES discussion list. Through analysis and discussion within the project team, we summarized the published literature, and common questions and challenges into briefing materials for the Delphi panel, comprising 33 members. Within three rounds this panel had reached consensus on 20 key publication standards, with an overall response rate of 90%. CONCLUSION: This project used multiple sources to draw together evidence and expertise in meta-narrative reviews. For each item we have included an explanation for why it is important and guidance on how it might be reported. Meta-narrative review is a relatively new method for evidence synthesis and as experience and methodological developments occur, we anticipate that these standards will evolve to reflect further theoretical and methodological developments. We hope that these standards will act as a resource that will contribute to improving the reporting of meta-narrative reviews. To encourage dissemination of the RAMESES publication standards, this article is co-published in the Journal of Advanced Nursing and is freely accessible on Wiley Online Library (http://www.wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/jan). Please see related articles http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/11/21 and http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/11/22
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3558334
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35583342013-01-31 RAMESES publication standards: meta-narrative reviews Wong, Geoff Greenhalgh, Trish Westhorp, Gill Buckingham, Jeanette Pawson, Ray BMC Med Guideline BACKGROUND: Meta-narrative review is one of an emerging menu of new approaches to qualitative and mixed-method systematic review. A meta-narrative review seeks to illuminate a heterogeneous topic area by highlighting the contrasting and complementary ways in which researchers have studied the same or a similar topic. No previous publication standards exist for the reporting of meta-narrative reviews. This publication standard was developed as part of the RAMESES (Realist And MEta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards) project. The project's aim is to produce preliminary publication standards for meta-narrative reviews. METHODS: We (a) collated and summarized existing literature on the principles of good practice in meta-narrative reviews; (b) considered the extent to which these principles had been followed by published reviews, thereby identifying how rigor may be lost and how existing methods could be improved; (c) used a three-round online Delphi method with an interdisciplinary panel of national and international experts in evidence synthesis, meta-narrative reviews, policy and/or publishing to produce and iteratively refine a draft set of methodological steps and publication standards; (d) provided real-time support to ongoing meta-narrative reviews and the open-access RAMESES online discussion list so as to capture problems and questions as they arose; and (e) synthesized expert input, evidence review and real-time problem analysis into a definitive set of standards. RESULTS: We identified nine published meta-narrative reviews, provided real-time support to four ongoing reviews and captured questions raised in the RAMESES discussion list. Through analysis and discussion within the project team, we summarized the published literature, and common questions and challenges into briefing materials for the Delphi panel, comprising 33 members. Within three rounds this panel had reached consensus on 20 key publication standards, with an overall response rate of 90%. CONCLUSION: This project used multiple sources to draw together evidence and expertise in meta-narrative reviews. For each item we have included an explanation for why it is important and guidance on how it might be reported. Meta-narrative review is a relatively new method for evidence synthesis and as experience and methodological developments occur, we anticipate that these standards will evolve to reflect further theoretical and methodological developments. We hope that these standards will act as a resource that will contribute to improving the reporting of meta-narrative reviews. To encourage dissemination of the RAMESES publication standards, this article is co-published in the Journal of Advanced Nursing and is freely accessible on Wiley Online Library (http://www.wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/jan). Please see related articles http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/11/21 and http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/11/22 BioMed Central 2013-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3558334/ /pubmed/23360661 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-11-20 Text en Copyright ©2013 Wong et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Guideline
Wong, Geoff
Greenhalgh, Trish
Westhorp, Gill
Buckingham, Jeanette
Pawson, Ray
RAMESES publication standards: meta-narrative reviews
title RAMESES publication standards: meta-narrative reviews
title_full RAMESES publication standards: meta-narrative reviews
title_fullStr RAMESES publication standards: meta-narrative reviews
title_full_unstemmed RAMESES publication standards: meta-narrative reviews
title_short RAMESES publication standards: meta-narrative reviews
title_sort rameses publication standards: meta-narrative reviews
topic Guideline
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3558334/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23360661
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-11-20
work_keys_str_mv AT wonggeoff ramesespublicationstandardsmetanarrativereviews
AT greenhalghtrish ramesespublicationstandardsmetanarrativereviews
AT westhorpgill ramesespublicationstandardsmetanarrativereviews
AT buckinghamjeanette ramesespublicationstandardsmetanarrativereviews
AT pawsonray ramesespublicationstandardsmetanarrativereviews