Cargando…

Divergent Receiver Responses to Components of Multimodal Signals in Two Foot-Flagging Frog Species

Multimodal communication of acoustic and visual signals serves a vital role in the mating system of anuran amphibians. To understand signal evolution and function in multimodal signal design it is critical to test receiver responses to unimodal signal components versus multimodal composite signals....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Preininger, Doris, Boeckle, Markus, Sztatecsny, Marc, Hödl, Walter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3558420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23383168
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055367
_version_ 1782257432179769344
author Preininger, Doris
Boeckle, Markus
Sztatecsny, Marc
Hödl, Walter
author_facet Preininger, Doris
Boeckle, Markus
Sztatecsny, Marc
Hödl, Walter
author_sort Preininger, Doris
collection PubMed
description Multimodal communication of acoustic and visual signals serves a vital role in the mating system of anuran amphibians. To understand signal evolution and function in multimodal signal design it is critical to test receiver responses to unimodal signal components versus multimodal composite signals. We investigated two anuran species displaying a conspicuous foot-flagging behavior in addition to or in combination with advertisement calls while announcing their signaling sites to conspecifics. To investigate the conspicuousness of the foot-flagging signals, we measured and compared spectral reflectance of foot webbings of Micrixalus saxicola and Staurois parvus using a spectrophotometer. We performed behavioral field experiments using a model frog including an extendable leg combined with acoustic playbacks to test receiver responses to acoustic, visual and combined audio-visual stimuli. Our results indicated that the foot webbings of S. parvus achieved a 13 times higher contrast against their visual background than feet of M. saxicola. The main response to all experimental stimuli in S. parvus was foot flagging, whereas M. saxicola responded primarily with calls but never foot flagged. Together these across-species differences suggest that in S. parvus foot-flagging behavior is applied as a salient and frequently used communicative signal during agonistic behavior, whereas we propose it constitutes an evolutionary nascent state in ritualization of the current fighting behavior in M. saxicola.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3558420
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35584202013-02-04 Divergent Receiver Responses to Components of Multimodal Signals in Two Foot-Flagging Frog Species Preininger, Doris Boeckle, Markus Sztatecsny, Marc Hödl, Walter PLoS One Research Article Multimodal communication of acoustic and visual signals serves a vital role in the mating system of anuran amphibians. To understand signal evolution and function in multimodal signal design it is critical to test receiver responses to unimodal signal components versus multimodal composite signals. We investigated two anuran species displaying a conspicuous foot-flagging behavior in addition to or in combination with advertisement calls while announcing their signaling sites to conspecifics. To investigate the conspicuousness of the foot-flagging signals, we measured and compared spectral reflectance of foot webbings of Micrixalus saxicola and Staurois parvus using a spectrophotometer. We performed behavioral field experiments using a model frog including an extendable leg combined with acoustic playbacks to test receiver responses to acoustic, visual and combined audio-visual stimuli. Our results indicated that the foot webbings of S. parvus achieved a 13 times higher contrast against their visual background than feet of M. saxicola. The main response to all experimental stimuli in S. parvus was foot flagging, whereas M. saxicola responded primarily with calls but never foot flagged. Together these across-species differences suggest that in S. parvus foot-flagging behavior is applied as a salient and frequently used communicative signal during agonistic behavior, whereas we propose it constitutes an evolutionary nascent state in ritualization of the current fighting behavior in M. saxicola. Public Library of Science 2013-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3558420/ /pubmed/23383168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055367 Text en © 2013 Preininger et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Preininger, Doris
Boeckle, Markus
Sztatecsny, Marc
Hödl, Walter
Divergent Receiver Responses to Components of Multimodal Signals in Two Foot-Flagging Frog Species
title Divergent Receiver Responses to Components of Multimodal Signals in Two Foot-Flagging Frog Species
title_full Divergent Receiver Responses to Components of Multimodal Signals in Two Foot-Flagging Frog Species
title_fullStr Divergent Receiver Responses to Components of Multimodal Signals in Two Foot-Flagging Frog Species
title_full_unstemmed Divergent Receiver Responses to Components of Multimodal Signals in Two Foot-Flagging Frog Species
title_short Divergent Receiver Responses to Components of Multimodal Signals in Two Foot-Flagging Frog Species
title_sort divergent receiver responses to components of multimodal signals in two foot-flagging frog species
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3558420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23383168
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055367
work_keys_str_mv AT preiningerdoris divergentreceiverresponsestocomponentsofmultimodalsignalsintwofootflaggingfrogspecies
AT boecklemarkus divergentreceiverresponsestocomponentsofmultimodalsignalsintwofootflaggingfrogspecies
AT sztatecsnymarc divergentreceiverresponsestocomponentsofmultimodalsignalsintwofootflaggingfrogspecies
AT hodlwalter divergentreceiverresponsestocomponentsofmultimodalsignalsintwofootflaggingfrogspecies