Cargando…
Divergent Receiver Responses to Components of Multimodal Signals in Two Foot-Flagging Frog Species
Multimodal communication of acoustic and visual signals serves a vital role in the mating system of anuran amphibians. To understand signal evolution and function in multimodal signal design it is critical to test receiver responses to unimodal signal components versus multimodal composite signals....
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3558420/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23383168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055367 |
_version_ | 1782257432179769344 |
---|---|
author | Preininger, Doris Boeckle, Markus Sztatecsny, Marc Hödl, Walter |
author_facet | Preininger, Doris Boeckle, Markus Sztatecsny, Marc Hödl, Walter |
author_sort | Preininger, Doris |
collection | PubMed |
description | Multimodal communication of acoustic and visual signals serves a vital role in the mating system of anuran amphibians. To understand signal evolution and function in multimodal signal design it is critical to test receiver responses to unimodal signal components versus multimodal composite signals. We investigated two anuran species displaying a conspicuous foot-flagging behavior in addition to or in combination with advertisement calls while announcing their signaling sites to conspecifics. To investigate the conspicuousness of the foot-flagging signals, we measured and compared spectral reflectance of foot webbings of Micrixalus saxicola and Staurois parvus using a spectrophotometer. We performed behavioral field experiments using a model frog including an extendable leg combined with acoustic playbacks to test receiver responses to acoustic, visual and combined audio-visual stimuli. Our results indicated that the foot webbings of S. parvus achieved a 13 times higher contrast against their visual background than feet of M. saxicola. The main response to all experimental stimuli in S. parvus was foot flagging, whereas M. saxicola responded primarily with calls but never foot flagged. Together these across-species differences suggest that in S. parvus foot-flagging behavior is applied as a salient and frequently used communicative signal during agonistic behavior, whereas we propose it constitutes an evolutionary nascent state in ritualization of the current fighting behavior in M. saxicola. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3558420 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35584202013-02-04 Divergent Receiver Responses to Components of Multimodal Signals in Two Foot-Flagging Frog Species Preininger, Doris Boeckle, Markus Sztatecsny, Marc Hödl, Walter PLoS One Research Article Multimodal communication of acoustic and visual signals serves a vital role in the mating system of anuran amphibians. To understand signal evolution and function in multimodal signal design it is critical to test receiver responses to unimodal signal components versus multimodal composite signals. We investigated two anuran species displaying a conspicuous foot-flagging behavior in addition to or in combination with advertisement calls while announcing their signaling sites to conspecifics. To investigate the conspicuousness of the foot-flagging signals, we measured and compared spectral reflectance of foot webbings of Micrixalus saxicola and Staurois parvus using a spectrophotometer. We performed behavioral field experiments using a model frog including an extendable leg combined with acoustic playbacks to test receiver responses to acoustic, visual and combined audio-visual stimuli. Our results indicated that the foot webbings of S. parvus achieved a 13 times higher contrast against their visual background than feet of M. saxicola. The main response to all experimental stimuli in S. parvus was foot flagging, whereas M. saxicola responded primarily with calls but never foot flagged. Together these across-species differences suggest that in S. parvus foot-flagging behavior is applied as a salient and frequently used communicative signal during agonistic behavior, whereas we propose it constitutes an evolutionary nascent state in ritualization of the current fighting behavior in M. saxicola. Public Library of Science 2013-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3558420/ /pubmed/23383168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055367 Text en © 2013 Preininger et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Preininger, Doris Boeckle, Markus Sztatecsny, Marc Hödl, Walter Divergent Receiver Responses to Components of Multimodal Signals in Two Foot-Flagging Frog Species |
title | Divergent Receiver Responses to Components of Multimodal Signals in Two Foot-Flagging Frog Species |
title_full | Divergent Receiver Responses to Components of Multimodal Signals in Two Foot-Flagging Frog Species |
title_fullStr | Divergent Receiver Responses to Components of Multimodal Signals in Two Foot-Flagging Frog Species |
title_full_unstemmed | Divergent Receiver Responses to Components of Multimodal Signals in Two Foot-Flagging Frog Species |
title_short | Divergent Receiver Responses to Components of Multimodal Signals in Two Foot-Flagging Frog Species |
title_sort | divergent receiver responses to components of multimodal signals in two foot-flagging frog species |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3558420/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23383168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055367 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT preiningerdoris divergentreceiverresponsestocomponentsofmultimodalsignalsintwofootflaggingfrogspecies AT boecklemarkus divergentreceiverresponsestocomponentsofmultimodalsignalsintwofootflaggingfrogspecies AT sztatecsnymarc divergentreceiverresponsestocomponentsofmultimodalsignalsintwofootflaggingfrogspecies AT hodlwalter divergentreceiverresponsestocomponentsofmultimodalsignalsintwofootflaggingfrogspecies |