Cargando…
Systematic screening with information and home sampling for genital Chlamydia trachomatis infections in young men and women in Norway: a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: As most genital Chlamydia trachomatis infections are asymptomatic, many patients do not seek health care for testing. Infections remain undiagnosed and untreated. We studied whether screening with information and home sampling resulted in more young people getting tested, diagnosed and t...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3558461/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23343391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-13-30 |
_version_ | 1782257441827717120 |
---|---|
author | Kløvstad, Hilde Natås, Olav Tverdal, Aage Aavitsland, Preben |
author_facet | Kløvstad, Hilde Natås, Olav Tverdal, Aage Aavitsland, Preben |
author_sort | Kløvstad, Hilde |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: As most genital Chlamydia trachomatis infections are asymptomatic, many patients do not seek health care for testing. Infections remain undiagnosed and untreated. We studied whether screening with information and home sampling resulted in more young people getting tested, diagnosed and treated for chlamydia in the three months following the intervention compared to the current strategy of testing in the health care system. METHOD: We conducted a population based randomized controlled trial among all persons aged 18–25 years in one Norwegian county (41 519 persons). 10 000 persons (intervention) received an invitation by mail with chlamydia information and a mail-back urine sampling kit. 31 519 persons received no intervention and continued with usual care (control). All samples from both groups were analysed in the same laboratory. Information on treatment was obtained from the Norwegian Prescription Database (NorPD). We estimated risk ratios and risk differences of being tested, diagnosed and treated in the intervention group compared to the control group. RESULTS: In the intervention group 16.5% got tested and in the control group 3.4%, risk ratio 4.9 (95% CI 4.5-5.2). The intervention led to 2.6 (95% CI 2.0-3.4) times as many individuals being diagnosed and 2.5 (95% CI 1.9-3.4) times as many individuals receiving treatment for chlamydia compared to no intervention in the three months following the intervention. CONCLUSION: In Norway, systematic screening with information and home sampling results in more young people being tested, diagnosed and treated for chlamydia in the three months following the intervention than the current strategy of testing in the health care system. However, the study has not established that the intervention will reduce the chlamydia prevalence or the risk of complications from chlamydia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov IDNCT00283127 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3558461 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35584612013-01-31 Systematic screening with information and home sampling for genital Chlamydia trachomatis infections in young men and women in Norway: a randomized controlled trial Kløvstad, Hilde Natås, Olav Tverdal, Aage Aavitsland, Preben BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: As most genital Chlamydia trachomatis infections are asymptomatic, many patients do not seek health care for testing. Infections remain undiagnosed and untreated. We studied whether screening with information and home sampling resulted in more young people getting tested, diagnosed and treated for chlamydia in the three months following the intervention compared to the current strategy of testing in the health care system. METHOD: We conducted a population based randomized controlled trial among all persons aged 18–25 years in one Norwegian county (41 519 persons). 10 000 persons (intervention) received an invitation by mail with chlamydia information and a mail-back urine sampling kit. 31 519 persons received no intervention and continued with usual care (control). All samples from both groups were analysed in the same laboratory. Information on treatment was obtained from the Norwegian Prescription Database (NorPD). We estimated risk ratios and risk differences of being tested, diagnosed and treated in the intervention group compared to the control group. RESULTS: In the intervention group 16.5% got tested and in the control group 3.4%, risk ratio 4.9 (95% CI 4.5-5.2). The intervention led to 2.6 (95% CI 2.0-3.4) times as many individuals being diagnosed and 2.5 (95% CI 1.9-3.4) times as many individuals receiving treatment for chlamydia compared to no intervention in the three months following the intervention. CONCLUSION: In Norway, systematic screening with information and home sampling results in more young people being tested, diagnosed and treated for chlamydia in the three months following the intervention than the current strategy of testing in the health care system. However, the study has not established that the intervention will reduce the chlamydia prevalence or the risk of complications from chlamydia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov IDNCT00283127 BioMed Central 2013-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3558461/ /pubmed/23343391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-13-30 Text en Copyright ©2013 Kløvstad et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kløvstad, Hilde Natås, Olav Tverdal, Aage Aavitsland, Preben Systematic screening with information and home sampling for genital Chlamydia trachomatis infections in young men and women in Norway: a randomized controlled trial |
title | Systematic screening with information and home sampling for genital Chlamydia trachomatis infections in young men and women in Norway: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Systematic screening with information and home sampling for genital Chlamydia trachomatis infections in young men and women in Norway: a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Systematic screening with information and home sampling for genital Chlamydia trachomatis infections in young men and women in Norway: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Systematic screening with information and home sampling for genital Chlamydia trachomatis infections in young men and women in Norway: a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Systematic screening with information and home sampling for genital Chlamydia trachomatis infections in young men and women in Norway: a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | systematic screening with information and home sampling for genital chlamydia trachomatis infections in young men and women in norway: a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3558461/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23343391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-13-30 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kløvstadhilde systematicscreeningwithinformationandhomesamplingforgenitalchlamydiatrachomatisinfectionsinyoungmenandwomeninnorwayarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT natasolav systematicscreeningwithinformationandhomesamplingforgenitalchlamydiatrachomatisinfectionsinyoungmenandwomeninnorwayarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT tverdalaage systematicscreeningwithinformationandhomesamplingforgenitalchlamydiatrachomatisinfectionsinyoungmenandwomeninnorwayarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT aavitslandpreben systematicscreeningwithinformationandhomesamplingforgenitalchlamydiatrachomatisinfectionsinyoungmenandwomeninnorwayarandomizedcontrolledtrial |