Cargando…
Anesthesiologist's satisfaction using between cisatracurium and rocuronium for the intubation in the anesthesia induced by remifentanil and propofol
BACKGROUND: Although cisatracurium has many advantages in anesthetic practices, the best choice of a nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking agent that can replace succinylcholine is rocuronium. However, it is reported that remifentanil with propofol might provide reliable intubating condition, even...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3558647/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23372884 http://dx.doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2013.64.1.34 |
_version_ | 1782257458533629952 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Hyunjung Jeong, Sinho Choi, Cheolhun Jeong, Hyejin Lee, Seongheon Jeong, Seongwook |
author_facet | Lee, Hyunjung Jeong, Sinho Choi, Cheolhun Jeong, Hyejin Lee, Seongheon Jeong, Seongwook |
author_sort | Lee, Hyunjung |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Although cisatracurium has many advantages in anesthetic practices, the best choice of a nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking agent that can replace succinylcholine is rocuronium. However, it is reported that remifentanil with propofol might provide reliable intubating condition, even without a neuromuscular blocking agent; therefore, it might improve the intubating condition with cisatracurium. This study examined intubating conditions after administering rocuronium or cisatracurium in a rapid sequence induction with remifentanil-propofol. METHODS: Fifty two ASA physical status 1 or 2 adult patients scheduled for an elective surgery were enrolled in a randomized double-blinded trial. Anesthesia was induced in all patients with propofol 2.0 mg/kg and remifentanil 0.5 µg/kg, administered over 60 seconds. Rocuronium 0.9 mg/kg (3 × ED(95), R group, n = 23) or cisatracurium 0.15 mg/kg (3 × ED(95), C group, n = 29) was administered after the induction sequence. Laryngoscopy was attempted when the anesthesiologist thought it was 90 seconds after drug administration and appropriate time for intubation. The examiner, another anesthesiologist, recorded the exact time to intubation and suppression of maximal T1 on TOF. The intubating condition was assessed by the first anesthesiologist, as excellent, good, poor or not possible. RESULTS: The best time to laryngoscopy was predicted by measuring TOF and was found to be significantly longer in the C group (197 ± 53 s) than in the R group (102 ± 49 s) (P value < 0.05). However, time to larygoscopy, intubating condition during the laryngoscopy, and hemodynamic changes after intubation was similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Despite fundamentally slower onset time, cisatracurium can provide quite good intubating conditions, which were comparable to those achieved with equipotent doses of rocuronium, which is more expensive in anesthesia inducted with remifentanil and propofol. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3558647 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35586472013-01-31 Anesthesiologist's satisfaction using between cisatracurium and rocuronium for the intubation in the anesthesia induced by remifentanil and propofol Lee, Hyunjung Jeong, Sinho Choi, Cheolhun Jeong, Hyejin Lee, Seongheon Jeong, Seongwook Korean J Anesthesiol Clinical Research Article BACKGROUND: Although cisatracurium has many advantages in anesthetic practices, the best choice of a nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking agent that can replace succinylcholine is rocuronium. However, it is reported that remifentanil with propofol might provide reliable intubating condition, even without a neuromuscular blocking agent; therefore, it might improve the intubating condition with cisatracurium. This study examined intubating conditions after administering rocuronium or cisatracurium in a rapid sequence induction with remifentanil-propofol. METHODS: Fifty two ASA physical status 1 or 2 adult patients scheduled for an elective surgery were enrolled in a randomized double-blinded trial. Anesthesia was induced in all patients with propofol 2.0 mg/kg and remifentanil 0.5 µg/kg, administered over 60 seconds. Rocuronium 0.9 mg/kg (3 × ED(95), R group, n = 23) or cisatracurium 0.15 mg/kg (3 × ED(95), C group, n = 29) was administered after the induction sequence. Laryngoscopy was attempted when the anesthesiologist thought it was 90 seconds after drug administration and appropriate time for intubation. The examiner, another anesthesiologist, recorded the exact time to intubation and suppression of maximal T1 on TOF. The intubating condition was assessed by the first anesthesiologist, as excellent, good, poor or not possible. RESULTS: The best time to laryngoscopy was predicted by measuring TOF and was found to be significantly longer in the C group (197 ± 53 s) than in the R group (102 ± 49 s) (P value < 0.05). However, time to larygoscopy, intubating condition during the laryngoscopy, and hemodynamic changes after intubation was similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Despite fundamentally slower onset time, cisatracurium can provide quite good intubating conditions, which were comparable to those achieved with equipotent doses of rocuronium, which is more expensive in anesthesia inducted with remifentanil and propofol. The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists 2013-01 2013-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3558647/ /pubmed/23372884 http://dx.doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2013.64.1.34 Text en Copyright © the Korean Society of Anesthesiologists, 2013 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Research Article Lee, Hyunjung Jeong, Sinho Choi, Cheolhun Jeong, Hyejin Lee, Seongheon Jeong, Seongwook Anesthesiologist's satisfaction using between cisatracurium and rocuronium for the intubation in the anesthesia induced by remifentanil and propofol |
title | Anesthesiologist's satisfaction using between cisatracurium and rocuronium for the intubation in the anesthesia induced by remifentanil and propofol |
title_full | Anesthesiologist's satisfaction using between cisatracurium and rocuronium for the intubation in the anesthesia induced by remifentanil and propofol |
title_fullStr | Anesthesiologist's satisfaction using between cisatracurium and rocuronium for the intubation in the anesthesia induced by remifentanil and propofol |
title_full_unstemmed | Anesthesiologist's satisfaction using between cisatracurium and rocuronium for the intubation in the anesthesia induced by remifentanil and propofol |
title_short | Anesthesiologist's satisfaction using between cisatracurium and rocuronium for the intubation in the anesthesia induced by remifentanil and propofol |
title_sort | anesthesiologist's satisfaction using between cisatracurium and rocuronium for the intubation in the anesthesia induced by remifentanil and propofol |
topic | Clinical Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3558647/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23372884 http://dx.doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2013.64.1.34 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leehyunjung anesthesiologistssatisfactionusingbetweencisatracuriumandrocuroniumfortheintubationintheanesthesiainducedbyremifentanilandpropofol AT jeongsinho anesthesiologistssatisfactionusingbetweencisatracuriumandrocuroniumfortheintubationintheanesthesiainducedbyremifentanilandpropofol AT choicheolhun anesthesiologistssatisfactionusingbetweencisatracuriumandrocuroniumfortheintubationintheanesthesiainducedbyremifentanilandpropofol AT jeonghyejin anesthesiologistssatisfactionusingbetweencisatracuriumandrocuroniumfortheintubationintheanesthesiainducedbyremifentanilandpropofol AT leeseongheon anesthesiologistssatisfactionusingbetweencisatracuriumandrocuroniumfortheintubationintheanesthesiainducedbyremifentanilandpropofol AT jeongseongwook anesthesiologistssatisfactionusingbetweencisatracuriumandrocuroniumfortheintubationintheanesthesiainducedbyremifentanilandpropofol |