Cargando…

Anesthesiologist's satisfaction using between cisatracurium and rocuronium for the intubation in the anesthesia induced by remifentanil and propofol

BACKGROUND: Although cisatracurium has many advantages in anesthetic practices, the best choice of a nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking agent that can replace succinylcholine is rocuronium. However, it is reported that remifentanil with propofol might provide reliable intubating condition, even...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Hyunjung, Jeong, Sinho, Choi, Cheolhun, Jeong, Hyejin, Lee, Seongheon, Jeong, Seongwook
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3558647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23372884
http://dx.doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2013.64.1.34
_version_ 1782257458533629952
author Lee, Hyunjung
Jeong, Sinho
Choi, Cheolhun
Jeong, Hyejin
Lee, Seongheon
Jeong, Seongwook
author_facet Lee, Hyunjung
Jeong, Sinho
Choi, Cheolhun
Jeong, Hyejin
Lee, Seongheon
Jeong, Seongwook
author_sort Lee, Hyunjung
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although cisatracurium has many advantages in anesthetic practices, the best choice of a nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking agent that can replace succinylcholine is rocuronium. However, it is reported that remifentanil with propofol might provide reliable intubating condition, even without a neuromuscular blocking agent; therefore, it might improve the intubating condition with cisatracurium. This study examined intubating conditions after administering rocuronium or cisatracurium in a rapid sequence induction with remifentanil-propofol. METHODS: Fifty two ASA physical status 1 or 2 adult patients scheduled for an elective surgery were enrolled in a randomized double-blinded trial. Anesthesia was induced in all patients with propofol 2.0 mg/kg and remifentanil 0.5 µg/kg, administered over 60 seconds. Rocuronium 0.9 mg/kg (3 × ED(95), R group, n = 23) or cisatracurium 0.15 mg/kg (3 × ED(95), C group, n = 29) was administered after the induction sequence. Laryngoscopy was attempted when the anesthesiologist thought it was 90 seconds after drug administration and appropriate time for intubation. The examiner, another anesthesiologist, recorded the exact time to intubation and suppression of maximal T1 on TOF. The intubating condition was assessed by the first anesthesiologist, as excellent, good, poor or not possible. RESULTS: The best time to laryngoscopy was predicted by measuring TOF and was found to be significantly longer in the C group (197 ± 53 s) than in the R group (102 ± 49 s) (P value < 0.05). However, time to larygoscopy, intubating condition during the laryngoscopy, and hemodynamic changes after intubation was similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Despite fundamentally slower onset time, cisatracurium can provide quite good intubating conditions, which were comparable to those achieved with equipotent doses of rocuronium, which is more expensive in anesthesia inducted with remifentanil and propofol.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3558647
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35586472013-01-31 Anesthesiologist's satisfaction using between cisatracurium and rocuronium for the intubation in the anesthesia induced by remifentanil and propofol Lee, Hyunjung Jeong, Sinho Choi, Cheolhun Jeong, Hyejin Lee, Seongheon Jeong, Seongwook Korean J Anesthesiol Clinical Research Article BACKGROUND: Although cisatracurium has many advantages in anesthetic practices, the best choice of a nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking agent that can replace succinylcholine is rocuronium. However, it is reported that remifentanil with propofol might provide reliable intubating condition, even without a neuromuscular blocking agent; therefore, it might improve the intubating condition with cisatracurium. This study examined intubating conditions after administering rocuronium or cisatracurium in a rapid sequence induction with remifentanil-propofol. METHODS: Fifty two ASA physical status 1 or 2 adult patients scheduled for an elective surgery were enrolled in a randomized double-blinded trial. Anesthesia was induced in all patients with propofol 2.0 mg/kg and remifentanil 0.5 µg/kg, administered over 60 seconds. Rocuronium 0.9 mg/kg (3 × ED(95), R group, n = 23) or cisatracurium 0.15 mg/kg (3 × ED(95), C group, n = 29) was administered after the induction sequence. Laryngoscopy was attempted when the anesthesiologist thought it was 90 seconds after drug administration and appropriate time for intubation. The examiner, another anesthesiologist, recorded the exact time to intubation and suppression of maximal T1 on TOF. The intubating condition was assessed by the first anesthesiologist, as excellent, good, poor or not possible. RESULTS: The best time to laryngoscopy was predicted by measuring TOF and was found to be significantly longer in the C group (197 ± 53 s) than in the R group (102 ± 49 s) (P value < 0.05). However, time to larygoscopy, intubating condition during the laryngoscopy, and hemodynamic changes after intubation was similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Despite fundamentally slower onset time, cisatracurium can provide quite good intubating conditions, which were comparable to those achieved with equipotent doses of rocuronium, which is more expensive in anesthesia inducted with remifentanil and propofol. The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists 2013-01 2013-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3558647/ /pubmed/23372884 http://dx.doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2013.64.1.34 Text en Copyright © the Korean Society of Anesthesiologists, 2013 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Research Article
Lee, Hyunjung
Jeong, Sinho
Choi, Cheolhun
Jeong, Hyejin
Lee, Seongheon
Jeong, Seongwook
Anesthesiologist's satisfaction using between cisatracurium and rocuronium for the intubation in the anesthesia induced by remifentanil and propofol
title Anesthesiologist's satisfaction using between cisatracurium and rocuronium for the intubation in the anesthesia induced by remifentanil and propofol
title_full Anesthesiologist's satisfaction using between cisatracurium and rocuronium for the intubation in the anesthesia induced by remifentanil and propofol
title_fullStr Anesthesiologist's satisfaction using between cisatracurium and rocuronium for the intubation in the anesthesia induced by remifentanil and propofol
title_full_unstemmed Anesthesiologist's satisfaction using between cisatracurium and rocuronium for the intubation in the anesthesia induced by remifentanil and propofol
title_short Anesthesiologist's satisfaction using between cisatracurium and rocuronium for the intubation in the anesthesia induced by remifentanil and propofol
title_sort anesthesiologist's satisfaction using between cisatracurium and rocuronium for the intubation in the anesthesia induced by remifentanil and propofol
topic Clinical Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3558647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23372884
http://dx.doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2013.64.1.34
work_keys_str_mv AT leehyunjung anesthesiologistssatisfactionusingbetweencisatracuriumandrocuroniumfortheintubationintheanesthesiainducedbyremifentanilandpropofol
AT jeongsinho anesthesiologistssatisfactionusingbetweencisatracuriumandrocuroniumfortheintubationintheanesthesiainducedbyremifentanilandpropofol
AT choicheolhun anesthesiologistssatisfactionusingbetweencisatracuriumandrocuroniumfortheintubationintheanesthesiainducedbyremifentanilandpropofol
AT jeonghyejin anesthesiologistssatisfactionusingbetweencisatracuriumandrocuroniumfortheintubationintheanesthesiainducedbyremifentanilandpropofol
AT leeseongheon anesthesiologistssatisfactionusingbetweencisatracuriumandrocuroniumfortheintubationintheanesthesiainducedbyremifentanilandpropofol
AT jeongseongwook anesthesiologistssatisfactionusingbetweencisatracuriumandrocuroniumfortheintubationintheanesthesiainducedbyremifentanilandpropofol