Cargando…

Self-referential forces are sufficient to explain different dendritic morphologies

Dendritic morphology constrains brain activity, as it determines first which neuronal circuits are possible and second which dendritic computations can be performed over a neuron's inputs. It is known that a range of chemical cues can influence the final shape of dendrites during development. H...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Memelli, Heraldo, Torben-Nielsen, Benjamin, Kozloski, James
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3558683/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23386828
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2013.00001
_version_ 1782257464714985472
author Memelli, Heraldo
Torben-Nielsen, Benjamin
Kozloski, James
author_facet Memelli, Heraldo
Torben-Nielsen, Benjamin
Kozloski, James
author_sort Memelli, Heraldo
collection PubMed
description Dendritic morphology constrains brain activity, as it determines first which neuronal circuits are possible and second which dendritic computations can be performed over a neuron's inputs. It is known that a range of chemical cues can influence the final shape of dendrites during development. Here, we investigate the extent to which self-referential influences, cues generated by the neuron itself, might influence morphology. To this end, we developed a phenomenological model and algorithm to generate virtual morphologies, which are then compared to experimentally reconstructed morphologies. In the model, branching probability follows a Galton–Watson process, while the geometry is determined by “homotypic forces” exerting influence on the direction of random growth in a constrained space. We model three such homotypic forces, namely an inertial force based on membrane stiffness, a soma-oriented tropism, and a force of self-avoidance, as directional biases in the growth algorithm. With computer simulations we explored how each bias shapes neuronal morphologies. We show that based on these principles, we can generate realistic morphologies of several distinct neuronal types. We discuss the extent to which homotypic forces might influence real dendritic morphologies, and speculate about the influence of other environmental cues on neuronal shape and circuitry.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3558683
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35586832013-02-05 Self-referential forces are sufficient to explain different dendritic morphologies Memelli, Heraldo Torben-Nielsen, Benjamin Kozloski, James Front Neuroinform Neuroscience Dendritic morphology constrains brain activity, as it determines first which neuronal circuits are possible and second which dendritic computations can be performed over a neuron's inputs. It is known that a range of chemical cues can influence the final shape of dendrites during development. Here, we investigate the extent to which self-referential influences, cues generated by the neuron itself, might influence morphology. To this end, we developed a phenomenological model and algorithm to generate virtual morphologies, which are then compared to experimentally reconstructed morphologies. In the model, branching probability follows a Galton–Watson process, while the geometry is determined by “homotypic forces” exerting influence on the direction of random growth in a constrained space. We model three such homotypic forces, namely an inertial force based on membrane stiffness, a soma-oriented tropism, and a force of self-avoidance, as directional biases in the growth algorithm. With computer simulations we explored how each bias shapes neuronal morphologies. We show that based on these principles, we can generate realistic morphologies of several distinct neuronal types. We discuss the extent to which homotypic forces might influence real dendritic morphologies, and speculate about the influence of other environmental cues on neuronal shape and circuitry. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3558683/ /pubmed/23386828 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2013.00001 Text en Copyright © 2013 Memelli, Torben-Nielsen and Kozloski. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Memelli, Heraldo
Torben-Nielsen, Benjamin
Kozloski, James
Self-referential forces are sufficient to explain different dendritic morphologies
title Self-referential forces are sufficient to explain different dendritic morphologies
title_full Self-referential forces are sufficient to explain different dendritic morphologies
title_fullStr Self-referential forces are sufficient to explain different dendritic morphologies
title_full_unstemmed Self-referential forces are sufficient to explain different dendritic morphologies
title_short Self-referential forces are sufficient to explain different dendritic morphologies
title_sort self-referential forces are sufficient to explain different dendritic morphologies
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3558683/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23386828
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2013.00001
work_keys_str_mv AT memelliheraldo selfreferentialforcesaresufficienttoexplaindifferentdendriticmorphologies
AT torbennielsenbenjamin selfreferentialforcesaresufficienttoexplaindifferentdendriticmorphologies
AT kozloskijames selfreferentialforcesaresufficienttoexplaindifferentdendriticmorphologies