Cargando…

Cameraless Peritoneal Entry in Abdominal Laparoscopy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Despite significant advances in laparoscopic instrumentation and techniques, injury to intraabdominal structures remains a potentially serious complication of peritoneal access. Consensus on the best method to obtain peritoneal access is lacking. A safe technique that does...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carlson, William H., Tully, Griffeth, Rajguru, Amit, Burnett, Dan R., Rendon, Ricardo A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3558892/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23484564
http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/108680812X13462882737014
_version_ 1782257482802921472
author Carlson, William H.
Tully, Griffeth
Rajguru, Amit
Burnett, Dan R.
Rendon, Ricardo A.
author_facet Carlson, William H.
Tully, Griffeth
Rajguru, Amit
Burnett, Dan R.
Rendon, Ricardo A.
author_sort Carlson, William H.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Despite significant advances in laparoscopic instrumentation and techniques, injury to intraabdominal structures remains a potentially serious complication of peritoneal access. Consensus on the best method to obtain peritoneal access is lacking. A safe technique that does not rely on direct visualization of the abdominal layers could shorten the learning curve for surgeons and potentially be adopted by other physicians for a variety of nonsurgical indications for peritoneal entry. METHODS: A prospective series of 99 consecutive patients who underwent upper-abdominal laparoscopic surgery performed by a single surgeon between January 2009 and June 2010 was reviewed. The method used to obtain peritoneal access was the fluid-based peritoneal entry indication technique (C-PET) with the EndoTIP trocar. RESULTS: Successful abdominal entry using C-PET was achieved in 90 (90.9%) of the patients; no trocar-related injuries or other injuries associated with peritoneal access occurred. The mean time from incision to confirmed peritoneal access was 21.4 s (range, 12 to 65). Of the 9 cases in which C-PET did not successfully gain entry, 6 occurred during the first 20 surgeries and only 3 in the final 79. CONCLUSIONS: C-PET is simple, safe, timely, and effective for gaining peritoneal access during laparoscopic abdominal surgeries. In this series, C-PET produced no complications and proved effective across a wide variety of patients, including the obese and those who had had previous surgery. Furthermore, C-PET does not require visual recognition of anatomic layers and potentially could easily be taught to nonsurgeon physicians who perform peritoneal access.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3558892
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35588922013-02-13 Cameraless Peritoneal Entry in Abdominal Laparoscopy Carlson, William H. Tully, Griffeth Rajguru, Amit Burnett, Dan R. Rendon, Ricardo A. JSLS Scientific Papers BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Despite significant advances in laparoscopic instrumentation and techniques, injury to intraabdominal structures remains a potentially serious complication of peritoneal access. Consensus on the best method to obtain peritoneal access is lacking. A safe technique that does not rely on direct visualization of the abdominal layers could shorten the learning curve for surgeons and potentially be adopted by other physicians for a variety of nonsurgical indications for peritoneal entry. METHODS: A prospective series of 99 consecutive patients who underwent upper-abdominal laparoscopic surgery performed by a single surgeon between January 2009 and June 2010 was reviewed. The method used to obtain peritoneal access was the fluid-based peritoneal entry indication technique (C-PET) with the EndoTIP trocar. RESULTS: Successful abdominal entry using C-PET was achieved in 90 (90.9%) of the patients; no trocar-related injuries or other injuries associated with peritoneal access occurred. The mean time from incision to confirmed peritoneal access was 21.4 s (range, 12 to 65). Of the 9 cases in which C-PET did not successfully gain entry, 6 occurred during the first 20 surgeries and only 3 in the final 79. CONCLUSIONS: C-PET is simple, safe, timely, and effective for gaining peritoneal access during laparoscopic abdominal surgeries. In this series, C-PET produced no complications and proved effective across a wide variety of patients, including the obese and those who had had previous surgery. Furthermore, C-PET does not require visual recognition of anatomic layers and potentially could easily be taught to nonsurgeon physicians who perform peritoneal access. Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3558892/ /pubmed/23484564 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/108680812X13462882737014 Text en © 2012 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way.
spellingShingle Scientific Papers
Carlson, William H.
Tully, Griffeth
Rajguru, Amit
Burnett, Dan R.
Rendon, Ricardo A.
Cameraless Peritoneal Entry in Abdominal Laparoscopy
title Cameraless Peritoneal Entry in Abdominal Laparoscopy
title_full Cameraless Peritoneal Entry in Abdominal Laparoscopy
title_fullStr Cameraless Peritoneal Entry in Abdominal Laparoscopy
title_full_unstemmed Cameraless Peritoneal Entry in Abdominal Laparoscopy
title_short Cameraless Peritoneal Entry in Abdominal Laparoscopy
title_sort cameraless peritoneal entry in abdominal laparoscopy
topic Scientific Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3558892/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23484564
http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/108680812X13462882737014
work_keys_str_mv AT carlsonwilliamh cameralessperitonealentryinabdominallaparoscopy
AT tullygriffeth cameralessperitonealentryinabdominallaparoscopy
AT rajguruamit cameralessperitonealentryinabdominallaparoscopy
AT burnettdanr cameralessperitonealentryinabdominallaparoscopy
AT rendonricardoa cameralessperitonealentryinabdominallaparoscopy