Cargando…
Cameraless Peritoneal Entry in Abdominal Laparoscopy
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Despite significant advances in laparoscopic instrumentation and techniques, injury to intraabdominal structures remains a potentially serious complication of peritoneal access. Consensus on the best method to obtain peritoneal access is lacking. A safe technique that does...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3558892/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23484564 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/108680812X13462882737014 |
_version_ | 1782257482802921472 |
---|---|
author | Carlson, William H. Tully, Griffeth Rajguru, Amit Burnett, Dan R. Rendon, Ricardo A. |
author_facet | Carlson, William H. Tully, Griffeth Rajguru, Amit Burnett, Dan R. Rendon, Ricardo A. |
author_sort | Carlson, William H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Despite significant advances in laparoscopic instrumentation and techniques, injury to intraabdominal structures remains a potentially serious complication of peritoneal access. Consensus on the best method to obtain peritoneal access is lacking. A safe technique that does not rely on direct visualization of the abdominal layers could shorten the learning curve for surgeons and potentially be adopted by other physicians for a variety of nonsurgical indications for peritoneal entry. METHODS: A prospective series of 99 consecutive patients who underwent upper-abdominal laparoscopic surgery performed by a single surgeon between January 2009 and June 2010 was reviewed. The method used to obtain peritoneal access was the fluid-based peritoneal entry indication technique (C-PET) with the EndoTIP trocar. RESULTS: Successful abdominal entry using C-PET was achieved in 90 (90.9%) of the patients; no trocar-related injuries or other injuries associated with peritoneal access occurred. The mean time from incision to confirmed peritoneal access was 21.4 s (range, 12 to 65). Of the 9 cases in which C-PET did not successfully gain entry, 6 occurred during the first 20 surgeries and only 3 in the final 79. CONCLUSIONS: C-PET is simple, safe, timely, and effective for gaining peritoneal access during laparoscopic abdominal surgeries. In this series, C-PET produced no complications and proved effective across a wide variety of patients, including the obese and those who had had previous surgery. Furthermore, C-PET does not require visual recognition of anatomic layers and potentially could easily be taught to nonsurgeon physicians who perform peritoneal access. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3558892 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35588922013-02-13 Cameraless Peritoneal Entry in Abdominal Laparoscopy Carlson, William H. Tully, Griffeth Rajguru, Amit Burnett, Dan R. Rendon, Ricardo A. JSLS Scientific Papers BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Despite significant advances in laparoscopic instrumentation and techniques, injury to intraabdominal structures remains a potentially serious complication of peritoneal access. Consensus on the best method to obtain peritoneal access is lacking. A safe technique that does not rely on direct visualization of the abdominal layers could shorten the learning curve for surgeons and potentially be adopted by other physicians for a variety of nonsurgical indications for peritoneal entry. METHODS: A prospective series of 99 consecutive patients who underwent upper-abdominal laparoscopic surgery performed by a single surgeon between January 2009 and June 2010 was reviewed. The method used to obtain peritoneal access was the fluid-based peritoneal entry indication technique (C-PET) with the EndoTIP trocar. RESULTS: Successful abdominal entry using C-PET was achieved in 90 (90.9%) of the patients; no trocar-related injuries or other injuries associated with peritoneal access occurred. The mean time from incision to confirmed peritoneal access was 21.4 s (range, 12 to 65). Of the 9 cases in which C-PET did not successfully gain entry, 6 occurred during the first 20 surgeries and only 3 in the final 79. CONCLUSIONS: C-PET is simple, safe, timely, and effective for gaining peritoneal access during laparoscopic abdominal surgeries. In this series, C-PET produced no complications and proved effective across a wide variety of patients, including the obese and those who had had previous surgery. Furthermore, C-PET does not require visual recognition of anatomic layers and potentially could easily be taught to nonsurgeon physicians who perform peritoneal access. Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3558892/ /pubmed/23484564 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/108680812X13462882737014 Text en © 2012 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Papers Carlson, William H. Tully, Griffeth Rajguru, Amit Burnett, Dan R. Rendon, Ricardo A. Cameraless Peritoneal Entry in Abdominal Laparoscopy |
title | Cameraless Peritoneal Entry in Abdominal Laparoscopy |
title_full | Cameraless Peritoneal Entry in Abdominal Laparoscopy |
title_fullStr | Cameraless Peritoneal Entry in Abdominal Laparoscopy |
title_full_unstemmed | Cameraless Peritoneal Entry in Abdominal Laparoscopy |
title_short | Cameraless Peritoneal Entry in Abdominal Laparoscopy |
title_sort | cameraless peritoneal entry in abdominal laparoscopy |
topic | Scientific Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3558892/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23484564 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/108680812X13462882737014 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT carlsonwilliamh cameralessperitonealentryinabdominallaparoscopy AT tullygriffeth cameralessperitonealentryinabdominallaparoscopy AT rajguruamit cameralessperitonealentryinabdominallaparoscopy AT burnettdanr cameralessperitonealentryinabdominallaparoscopy AT rendonricardoa cameralessperitonealentryinabdominallaparoscopy |