Cargando…
A randomized trial of tigecycline versus ampicillin-sulbactam or amoxicillin-clavulanate for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections
BACKGROUND: Complicated skin and skin structure infections (cSSSIs) frequently result in hospitalization with significant morbidity and mortality. METHODS: In this phase 3b/4 parallel, randomized, open-label, comparative study, 531 subjects with cSSSI received tigecycline (100 mg initial dose, then...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3560230/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23145952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-12-297 |
_version_ | 1782257762395226112 |
---|---|
author | Matthews, Peter Alpert, Marc Rahav, Galia Rill, Denise Zito, Edward Gardiner, David Pedersen, Ron Babinchak, Timothy McGovern, Paul C |
author_facet | Matthews, Peter Alpert, Marc Rahav, Galia Rill, Denise Zito, Edward Gardiner, David Pedersen, Ron Babinchak, Timothy McGovern, Paul C |
author_sort | Matthews, Peter |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Complicated skin and skin structure infections (cSSSIs) frequently result in hospitalization with significant morbidity and mortality. METHODS: In this phase 3b/4 parallel, randomized, open-label, comparative study, 531 subjects with cSSSI received tigecycline (100 mg initial dose, then 50 mg intravenously every 12 hrs) or ampicillin-sulbactam 1.5-3 g IV every 6 hrs or amoxicillin-clavulanate 1.2 g IV every 6-8 hrs. Vancomycin could be added at the discretion of the investigator to the comparator arm if methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was confirmed or suspected within 72 hrs of enrollment. The primary endpoint was clinical response in the clinically evaluable (CE) population at the test-of-cure (TOC) visit. Microbiologic response and safety were also assessed. The modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population comprised 531 subjects (tigecycline, n = 268; comparator, n = 263) and 405 were clinically evaluable (tigecycline, n = 209; comparator, n = 196). RESULTS: In the CE population, 162/209 (77.5%) tigecycline-treated subjects and 152/196 (77.6%) comparator-treated subjects were clinically cured (difference 0.0; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -8.7, 8.6). The eradication rates at the subject level for the microbiologically evaluable (ME) population were 79.2% in the tigecycline treatment group and 76.8% in the comparator treatment group (difference 2.4; 95% CI: -9.6, 14.4) at the TOC assessment. Nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea rates were higher in the tigecycline group. CONCLUSIONS: Tigecycline was generally safe and effective in the treatment of cSSSIs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00368537 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3560230 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35602302013-02-04 A randomized trial of tigecycline versus ampicillin-sulbactam or amoxicillin-clavulanate for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections Matthews, Peter Alpert, Marc Rahav, Galia Rill, Denise Zito, Edward Gardiner, David Pedersen, Ron Babinchak, Timothy McGovern, Paul C BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Complicated skin and skin structure infections (cSSSIs) frequently result in hospitalization with significant morbidity and mortality. METHODS: In this phase 3b/4 parallel, randomized, open-label, comparative study, 531 subjects with cSSSI received tigecycline (100 mg initial dose, then 50 mg intravenously every 12 hrs) or ampicillin-sulbactam 1.5-3 g IV every 6 hrs or amoxicillin-clavulanate 1.2 g IV every 6-8 hrs. Vancomycin could be added at the discretion of the investigator to the comparator arm if methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was confirmed or suspected within 72 hrs of enrollment. The primary endpoint was clinical response in the clinically evaluable (CE) population at the test-of-cure (TOC) visit. Microbiologic response and safety were also assessed. The modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population comprised 531 subjects (tigecycline, n = 268; comparator, n = 263) and 405 were clinically evaluable (tigecycline, n = 209; comparator, n = 196). RESULTS: In the CE population, 162/209 (77.5%) tigecycline-treated subjects and 152/196 (77.6%) comparator-treated subjects were clinically cured (difference 0.0; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -8.7, 8.6). The eradication rates at the subject level for the microbiologically evaluable (ME) population were 79.2% in the tigecycline treatment group and 76.8% in the comparator treatment group (difference 2.4; 95% CI: -9.6, 14.4) at the TOC assessment. Nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea rates were higher in the tigecycline group. CONCLUSIONS: Tigecycline was generally safe and effective in the treatment of cSSSIs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00368537 BioMed Central 2012-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3560230/ /pubmed/23145952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-12-297 Text en Copyright ©2012 Matthews et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Matthews, Peter Alpert, Marc Rahav, Galia Rill, Denise Zito, Edward Gardiner, David Pedersen, Ron Babinchak, Timothy McGovern, Paul C A randomized trial of tigecycline versus ampicillin-sulbactam or amoxicillin-clavulanate for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections |
title | A randomized trial of tigecycline versus ampicillin-sulbactam or amoxicillin-clavulanate for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections |
title_full | A randomized trial of tigecycline versus ampicillin-sulbactam or amoxicillin-clavulanate for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections |
title_fullStr | A randomized trial of tigecycline versus ampicillin-sulbactam or amoxicillin-clavulanate for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections |
title_full_unstemmed | A randomized trial of tigecycline versus ampicillin-sulbactam or amoxicillin-clavulanate for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections |
title_short | A randomized trial of tigecycline versus ampicillin-sulbactam or amoxicillin-clavulanate for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections |
title_sort | randomized trial of tigecycline versus ampicillin-sulbactam or amoxicillin-clavulanate for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3560230/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23145952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-12-297 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT matthewspeter arandomizedtrialoftigecyclineversusampicillinsulbactamoramoxicillinclavulanateforthetreatmentofcomplicatedskinandskinstructureinfections AT alpertmarc arandomizedtrialoftigecyclineversusampicillinsulbactamoramoxicillinclavulanateforthetreatmentofcomplicatedskinandskinstructureinfections AT rahavgalia arandomizedtrialoftigecyclineversusampicillinsulbactamoramoxicillinclavulanateforthetreatmentofcomplicatedskinandskinstructureinfections AT rilldenise arandomizedtrialoftigecyclineversusampicillinsulbactamoramoxicillinclavulanateforthetreatmentofcomplicatedskinandskinstructureinfections AT zitoedward arandomizedtrialoftigecyclineversusampicillinsulbactamoramoxicillinclavulanateforthetreatmentofcomplicatedskinandskinstructureinfections AT gardinerdavid arandomizedtrialoftigecyclineversusampicillinsulbactamoramoxicillinclavulanateforthetreatmentofcomplicatedskinandskinstructureinfections AT pedersenron arandomizedtrialoftigecyclineversusampicillinsulbactamoramoxicillinclavulanateforthetreatmentofcomplicatedskinandskinstructureinfections AT babinchaktimothy arandomizedtrialoftigecyclineversusampicillinsulbactamoramoxicillinclavulanateforthetreatmentofcomplicatedskinandskinstructureinfections AT mcgovernpaulc arandomizedtrialoftigecyclineversusampicillinsulbactamoramoxicillinclavulanateforthetreatmentofcomplicatedskinandskinstructureinfections AT matthewspeter randomizedtrialoftigecyclineversusampicillinsulbactamoramoxicillinclavulanateforthetreatmentofcomplicatedskinandskinstructureinfections AT alpertmarc randomizedtrialoftigecyclineversusampicillinsulbactamoramoxicillinclavulanateforthetreatmentofcomplicatedskinandskinstructureinfections AT rahavgalia randomizedtrialoftigecyclineversusampicillinsulbactamoramoxicillinclavulanateforthetreatmentofcomplicatedskinandskinstructureinfections AT rilldenise randomizedtrialoftigecyclineversusampicillinsulbactamoramoxicillinclavulanateforthetreatmentofcomplicatedskinandskinstructureinfections AT zitoedward randomizedtrialoftigecyclineversusampicillinsulbactamoramoxicillinclavulanateforthetreatmentofcomplicatedskinandskinstructureinfections AT gardinerdavid randomizedtrialoftigecyclineversusampicillinsulbactamoramoxicillinclavulanateforthetreatmentofcomplicatedskinandskinstructureinfections AT pedersenron randomizedtrialoftigecyclineversusampicillinsulbactamoramoxicillinclavulanateforthetreatmentofcomplicatedskinandskinstructureinfections AT babinchaktimothy randomizedtrialoftigecyclineversusampicillinsulbactamoramoxicillinclavulanateforthetreatmentofcomplicatedskinandskinstructureinfections AT mcgovernpaulc randomizedtrialoftigecyclineversusampicillinsulbactamoramoxicillinclavulanateforthetreatmentofcomplicatedskinandskinstructureinfections |