Cargando…

A randomized trial of tigecycline versus ampicillin-sulbactam or amoxicillin-clavulanate for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections

BACKGROUND: Complicated skin and skin structure infections (cSSSIs) frequently result in hospitalization with significant morbidity and mortality. METHODS: In this phase 3b/4 parallel, randomized, open-label, comparative study, 531 subjects with cSSSI received tigecycline (100 mg initial dose, then...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matthews, Peter, Alpert, Marc, Rahav, Galia, Rill, Denise, Zito, Edward, Gardiner, David, Pedersen, Ron, Babinchak, Timothy, McGovern, Paul C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3560230/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23145952
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-12-297
_version_ 1782257762395226112
author Matthews, Peter
Alpert, Marc
Rahav, Galia
Rill, Denise
Zito, Edward
Gardiner, David
Pedersen, Ron
Babinchak, Timothy
McGovern, Paul C
author_facet Matthews, Peter
Alpert, Marc
Rahav, Galia
Rill, Denise
Zito, Edward
Gardiner, David
Pedersen, Ron
Babinchak, Timothy
McGovern, Paul C
author_sort Matthews, Peter
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Complicated skin and skin structure infections (cSSSIs) frequently result in hospitalization with significant morbidity and mortality. METHODS: In this phase 3b/4 parallel, randomized, open-label, comparative study, 531 subjects with cSSSI received tigecycline (100 mg initial dose, then 50 mg intravenously every 12 hrs) or ampicillin-sulbactam 1.5-3 g IV every 6 hrs or amoxicillin-clavulanate 1.2 g IV every 6-8 hrs. Vancomycin could be added at the discretion of the investigator to the comparator arm if methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was confirmed or suspected within 72 hrs of enrollment. The primary endpoint was clinical response in the clinically evaluable (CE) population at the test-of-cure (TOC) visit. Microbiologic response and safety were also assessed. The modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population comprised 531 subjects (tigecycline, n = 268; comparator, n = 263) and 405 were clinically evaluable (tigecycline, n = 209; comparator, n = 196). RESULTS: In the CE population, 162/209 (77.5%) tigecycline-treated subjects and 152/196 (77.6%) comparator-treated subjects were clinically cured (difference 0.0; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -8.7, 8.6). The eradication rates at the subject level for the microbiologically evaluable (ME) population were 79.2% in the tigecycline treatment group and 76.8% in the comparator treatment group (difference 2.4; 95% CI: -9.6, 14.4) at the TOC assessment. Nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea rates were higher in the tigecycline group. CONCLUSIONS: Tigecycline was generally safe and effective in the treatment of cSSSIs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00368537
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3560230
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35602302013-02-04 A randomized trial of tigecycline versus ampicillin-sulbactam or amoxicillin-clavulanate for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections Matthews, Peter Alpert, Marc Rahav, Galia Rill, Denise Zito, Edward Gardiner, David Pedersen, Ron Babinchak, Timothy McGovern, Paul C BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Complicated skin and skin structure infections (cSSSIs) frequently result in hospitalization with significant morbidity and mortality. METHODS: In this phase 3b/4 parallel, randomized, open-label, comparative study, 531 subjects with cSSSI received tigecycline (100 mg initial dose, then 50 mg intravenously every 12 hrs) or ampicillin-sulbactam 1.5-3 g IV every 6 hrs or amoxicillin-clavulanate 1.2 g IV every 6-8 hrs. Vancomycin could be added at the discretion of the investigator to the comparator arm if methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was confirmed or suspected within 72 hrs of enrollment. The primary endpoint was clinical response in the clinically evaluable (CE) population at the test-of-cure (TOC) visit. Microbiologic response and safety were also assessed. The modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population comprised 531 subjects (tigecycline, n = 268; comparator, n = 263) and 405 were clinically evaluable (tigecycline, n = 209; comparator, n = 196). RESULTS: In the CE population, 162/209 (77.5%) tigecycline-treated subjects and 152/196 (77.6%) comparator-treated subjects were clinically cured (difference 0.0; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -8.7, 8.6). The eradication rates at the subject level for the microbiologically evaluable (ME) population were 79.2% in the tigecycline treatment group and 76.8% in the comparator treatment group (difference 2.4; 95% CI: -9.6, 14.4) at the TOC assessment. Nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea rates were higher in the tigecycline group. CONCLUSIONS: Tigecycline was generally safe and effective in the treatment of cSSSIs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00368537 BioMed Central 2012-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3560230/ /pubmed/23145952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-12-297 Text en Copyright ©2012 Matthews et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Matthews, Peter
Alpert, Marc
Rahav, Galia
Rill, Denise
Zito, Edward
Gardiner, David
Pedersen, Ron
Babinchak, Timothy
McGovern, Paul C
A randomized trial of tigecycline versus ampicillin-sulbactam or amoxicillin-clavulanate for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections
title A randomized trial of tigecycline versus ampicillin-sulbactam or amoxicillin-clavulanate for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections
title_full A randomized trial of tigecycline versus ampicillin-sulbactam or amoxicillin-clavulanate for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections
title_fullStr A randomized trial of tigecycline versus ampicillin-sulbactam or amoxicillin-clavulanate for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections
title_full_unstemmed A randomized trial of tigecycline versus ampicillin-sulbactam or amoxicillin-clavulanate for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections
title_short A randomized trial of tigecycline versus ampicillin-sulbactam or amoxicillin-clavulanate for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections
title_sort randomized trial of tigecycline versus ampicillin-sulbactam or amoxicillin-clavulanate for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3560230/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23145952
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-12-297
work_keys_str_mv AT matthewspeter arandomizedtrialoftigecyclineversusampicillinsulbactamoramoxicillinclavulanateforthetreatmentofcomplicatedskinandskinstructureinfections
AT alpertmarc arandomizedtrialoftigecyclineversusampicillinsulbactamoramoxicillinclavulanateforthetreatmentofcomplicatedskinandskinstructureinfections
AT rahavgalia arandomizedtrialoftigecyclineversusampicillinsulbactamoramoxicillinclavulanateforthetreatmentofcomplicatedskinandskinstructureinfections
AT rilldenise arandomizedtrialoftigecyclineversusampicillinsulbactamoramoxicillinclavulanateforthetreatmentofcomplicatedskinandskinstructureinfections
AT zitoedward arandomizedtrialoftigecyclineversusampicillinsulbactamoramoxicillinclavulanateforthetreatmentofcomplicatedskinandskinstructureinfections
AT gardinerdavid arandomizedtrialoftigecyclineversusampicillinsulbactamoramoxicillinclavulanateforthetreatmentofcomplicatedskinandskinstructureinfections
AT pedersenron arandomizedtrialoftigecyclineversusampicillinsulbactamoramoxicillinclavulanateforthetreatmentofcomplicatedskinandskinstructureinfections
AT babinchaktimothy arandomizedtrialoftigecyclineversusampicillinsulbactamoramoxicillinclavulanateforthetreatmentofcomplicatedskinandskinstructureinfections
AT mcgovernpaulc arandomizedtrialoftigecyclineversusampicillinsulbactamoramoxicillinclavulanateforthetreatmentofcomplicatedskinandskinstructureinfections
AT matthewspeter randomizedtrialoftigecyclineversusampicillinsulbactamoramoxicillinclavulanateforthetreatmentofcomplicatedskinandskinstructureinfections
AT alpertmarc randomizedtrialoftigecyclineversusampicillinsulbactamoramoxicillinclavulanateforthetreatmentofcomplicatedskinandskinstructureinfections
AT rahavgalia randomizedtrialoftigecyclineversusampicillinsulbactamoramoxicillinclavulanateforthetreatmentofcomplicatedskinandskinstructureinfections
AT rilldenise randomizedtrialoftigecyclineversusampicillinsulbactamoramoxicillinclavulanateforthetreatmentofcomplicatedskinandskinstructureinfections
AT zitoedward randomizedtrialoftigecyclineversusampicillinsulbactamoramoxicillinclavulanateforthetreatmentofcomplicatedskinandskinstructureinfections
AT gardinerdavid randomizedtrialoftigecyclineversusampicillinsulbactamoramoxicillinclavulanateforthetreatmentofcomplicatedskinandskinstructureinfections
AT pedersenron randomizedtrialoftigecyclineversusampicillinsulbactamoramoxicillinclavulanateforthetreatmentofcomplicatedskinandskinstructureinfections
AT babinchaktimothy randomizedtrialoftigecyclineversusampicillinsulbactamoramoxicillinclavulanateforthetreatmentofcomplicatedskinandskinstructureinfections
AT mcgovernpaulc randomizedtrialoftigecyclineversusampicillinsulbactamoramoxicillinclavulanateforthetreatmentofcomplicatedskinandskinstructureinfections