Cargando…

The paradox of vaginal examination practice during normal childbirth: Palestinian women’s feelings, opinions, knowledge and experiences

BACKGROUND: Vaginal examination (VE), is a frequent procedure during childbirth. It is the most accepted ways to assess progress during childbirth, but its repetition at short intervals has no value. Over years, VE continued to be plagued by a nature that implies negative feelings and experiences of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hassan, Sahar J, Sundby, Johanne, Husseini, Abdullatif, Bjertness, Espen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3560273/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22929060
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-9-16
_version_ 1782257773543686144
author Hassan, Sahar J
Sundby, Johanne
Husseini, Abdullatif
Bjertness, Espen
author_facet Hassan, Sahar J
Sundby, Johanne
Husseini, Abdullatif
Bjertness, Espen
author_sort Hassan, Sahar J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Vaginal examination (VE), is a frequent procedure during childbirth. It is the most accepted ways to assess progress during childbirth, but its repetition at short intervals has no value. Over years, VE continued to be plagued by a nature that implies negative feelings and experiences of women. The aim of this exploratory qualitative study was to explore women’s feelings, opinions, knowledge and experiences of vaginal examinations (VE) during normal childbirth. METHODS: We interviewed 176 postpartum women using semi-structured questionnaire in a Palestinian public hospital in the oPt. Descriptive statistics were conducted; frequency counts and percentages for the quantitative questions. The association between the frequency of VE and age, parity, years of education, locale and the time of delivery was tested by Chi-squared and Fisher’s Exact test. The open-ended qualitative questions were read line-by-line for the content and coded. The assigned codes for all responses were entered to the SPSS statistical software version 18. RESULTS: As compared with WHO recommendations, VE was conducted too frequently, and by too many providers during childbirth. The proportion of women who received a ‘too high’ frequency of VEs during childbirth was significantly larger in primipara as compared to multipara women (P = .037). 82% of women reported pain or severe pain and 68% reported discomfort during VE. Some women reported insensitive approaches of providers, insufficient means of privacy and no respect of dignity or humanity during the exam. CONCLUSIONS: Palestinian women are undergoing unnecessary and frequent VEs during childbirth, conducted by several different providers and suffer pain and discomfort un-necessarily. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Adhering to best evidence, VE during childbirth should be conducted only when necessary, and if possible, by the same provider. This will decrease the laboring women’s unnecessary suffering from pain and discomfort. Providers should advocate for women’s right to information, respect, dignity and privacy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3560273
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35602732013-02-04 The paradox of vaginal examination practice during normal childbirth: Palestinian women’s feelings, opinions, knowledge and experiences Hassan, Sahar J Sundby, Johanne Husseini, Abdullatif Bjertness, Espen Reprod Health Research BACKGROUND: Vaginal examination (VE), is a frequent procedure during childbirth. It is the most accepted ways to assess progress during childbirth, but its repetition at short intervals has no value. Over years, VE continued to be plagued by a nature that implies negative feelings and experiences of women. The aim of this exploratory qualitative study was to explore women’s feelings, opinions, knowledge and experiences of vaginal examinations (VE) during normal childbirth. METHODS: We interviewed 176 postpartum women using semi-structured questionnaire in a Palestinian public hospital in the oPt. Descriptive statistics were conducted; frequency counts and percentages for the quantitative questions. The association between the frequency of VE and age, parity, years of education, locale and the time of delivery was tested by Chi-squared and Fisher’s Exact test. The open-ended qualitative questions were read line-by-line for the content and coded. The assigned codes for all responses were entered to the SPSS statistical software version 18. RESULTS: As compared with WHO recommendations, VE was conducted too frequently, and by too many providers during childbirth. The proportion of women who received a ‘too high’ frequency of VEs during childbirth was significantly larger in primipara as compared to multipara women (P = .037). 82% of women reported pain or severe pain and 68% reported discomfort during VE. Some women reported insensitive approaches of providers, insufficient means of privacy and no respect of dignity or humanity during the exam. CONCLUSIONS: Palestinian women are undergoing unnecessary and frequent VEs during childbirth, conducted by several different providers and suffer pain and discomfort un-necessarily. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Adhering to best evidence, VE during childbirth should be conducted only when necessary, and if possible, by the same provider. This will decrease the laboring women’s unnecessary suffering from pain and discomfort. Providers should advocate for women’s right to information, respect, dignity and privacy. BioMed Central 2012-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3560273/ /pubmed/22929060 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-9-16 Text en Copyright ©2012 Hassan et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Hassan, Sahar J
Sundby, Johanne
Husseini, Abdullatif
Bjertness, Espen
The paradox of vaginal examination practice during normal childbirth: Palestinian women’s feelings, opinions, knowledge and experiences
title The paradox of vaginal examination practice during normal childbirth: Palestinian women’s feelings, opinions, knowledge and experiences
title_full The paradox of vaginal examination practice during normal childbirth: Palestinian women’s feelings, opinions, knowledge and experiences
title_fullStr The paradox of vaginal examination practice during normal childbirth: Palestinian women’s feelings, opinions, knowledge and experiences
title_full_unstemmed The paradox of vaginal examination practice during normal childbirth: Palestinian women’s feelings, opinions, knowledge and experiences
title_short The paradox of vaginal examination practice during normal childbirth: Palestinian women’s feelings, opinions, knowledge and experiences
title_sort paradox of vaginal examination practice during normal childbirth: palestinian women’s feelings, opinions, knowledge and experiences
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3560273/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22929060
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-9-16
work_keys_str_mv AT hassansaharj theparadoxofvaginalexaminationpracticeduringnormalchildbirthpalestinianwomensfeelingsopinionsknowledgeandexperiences
AT sundbyjohanne theparadoxofvaginalexaminationpracticeduringnormalchildbirthpalestinianwomensfeelingsopinionsknowledgeandexperiences
AT husseiniabdullatif theparadoxofvaginalexaminationpracticeduringnormalchildbirthpalestinianwomensfeelingsopinionsknowledgeandexperiences
AT bjertnessespen theparadoxofvaginalexaminationpracticeduringnormalchildbirthpalestinianwomensfeelingsopinionsknowledgeandexperiences
AT hassansaharj paradoxofvaginalexaminationpracticeduringnormalchildbirthpalestinianwomensfeelingsopinionsknowledgeandexperiences
AT sundbyjohanne paradoxofvaginalexaminationpracticeduringnormalchildbirthpalestinianwomensfeelingsopinionsknowledgeandexperiences
AT husseiniabdullatif paradoxofvaginalexaminationpracticeduringnormalchildbirthpalestinianwomensfeelingsopinionsknowledgeandexperiences
AT bjertnessespen paradoxofvaginalexaminationpracticeduringnormalchildbirthpalestinianwomensfeelingsopinionsknowledgeandexperiences