Cargando…

The Effect of Probiotics on Prevention of Common Cold: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trial Studies

BACKGROUND: Probiotics are currently under focus for their immune improvement function. Many studies have been performed to assess the potential efficacy of probiotics in allergic disease, viral disease, respiratory disease, as well as gastrointestinal disease. This study performed a systematic revi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kang, En-Jin, Kim, Soo Young, Hwang, In-Hong, Ji, Yun-Jeong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Academy of Family Medicine 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3560336/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23372900
http://dx.doi.org/10.4082/kjfm.2013.34.1.2
_version_ 1782257778567413760
author Kang, En-Jin
Kim, Soo Young
Hwang, In-Hong
Ji, Yun-Jeong
author_facet Kang, En-Jin
Kim, Soo Young
Hwang, In-Hong
Ji, Yun-Jeong
author_sort Kang, En-Jin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Probiotics are currently under focus for their immune improvement function. Many studies have been performed to assess the potential efficacy of probiotics in allergic disease, viral disease, respiratory disease, as well as gastrointestinal disease. This study performed a systematic review to determine the effects of probiotics on the prevention of the common cold. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane CENTRAL for studies released through June 2011. Two authors independently extracted the data. To assess the risk of bias of included literatures, Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool was used. RESULTS: We identified 10 studies in 7 articles. A total 2,894 participants, 1,588 in the probiotics group and 1,306 in the control group, were included. The effect of probiotics on the prevention of the common cold had a relative risk (RR) of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.85 to 1.00, I(2) = 26%). In the subgroup analysis, the RR of administration of probiotics for 3 months or less was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.70 to 0.97). The RR of administration of probiotics over 3 months was 1.00 (95% CI, 0.92 to 1.09). The RR of administration of probiotics without any active intervention (vitamin and mineral) was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.78 to 0.97). CONCLUSION: In this meta-analysis, there was marginal effect of probiotics on the prevention of the common cold. The results implied that probiotics had a modest effect in common cold reduction. The balance of benefit and harms needs to be considered when using probiotics for common cold prevention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3560336
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher The Korean Academy of Family Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35603362013-01-31 The Effect of Probiotics on Prevention of Common Cold: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trial Studies Kang, En-Jin Kim, Soo Young Hwang, In-Hong Ji, Yun-Jeong Korean J Fam Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Probiotics are currently under focus for their immune improvement function. Many studies have been performed to assess the potential efficacy of probiotics in allergic disease, viral disease, respiratory disease, as well as gastrointestinal disease. This study performed a systematic review to determine the effects of probiotics on the prevention of the common cold. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane CENTRAL for studies released through June 2011. Two authors independently extracted the data. To assess the risk of bias of included literatures, Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool was used. RESULTS: We identified 10 studies in 7 articles. A total 2,894 participants, 1,588 in the probiotics group and 1,306 in the control group, were included. The effect of probiotics on the prevention of the common cold had a relative risk (RR) of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.85 to 1.00, I(2) = 26%). In the subgroup analysis, the RR of administration of probiotics for 3 months or less was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.70 to 0.97). The RR of administration of probiotics over 3 months was 1.00 (95% CI, 0.92 to 1.09). The RR of administration of probiotics without any active intervention (vitamin and mineral) was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.78 to 0.97). CONCLUSION: In this meta-analysis, there was marginal effect of probiotics on the prevention of the common cold. The results implied that probiotics had a modest effect in common cold reduction. The balance of benefit and harms needs to be considered when using probiotics for common cold prevention. The Korean Academy of Family Medicine 2013-01 2013-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3560336/ /pubmed/23372900 http://dx.doi.org/10.4082/kjfm.2013.34.1.2 Text en Copyright © 2013 The Korean Academy of Family Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kang, En-Jin
Kim, Soo Young
Hwang, In-Hong
Ji, Yun-Jeong
The Effect of Probiotics on Prevention of Common Cold: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trial Studies
title The Effect of Probiotics on Prevention of Common Cold: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trial Studies
title_full The Effect of Probiotics on Prevention of Common Cold: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trial Studies
title_fullStr The Effect of Probiotics on Prevention of Common Cold: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trial Studies
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Probiotics on Prevention of Common Cold: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trial Studies
title_short The Effect of Probiotics on Prevention of Common Cold: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trial Studies
title_sort effect of probiotics on prevention of common cold: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial studies
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3560336/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23372900
http://dx.doi.org/10.4082/kjfm.2013.34.1.2
work_keys_str_mv AT kangenjin theeffectofprobioticsonpreventionofcommoncoldametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialstudies
AT kimsooyoung theeffectofprobioticsonpreventionofcommoncoldametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialstudies
AT hwanginhong theeffectofprobioticsonpreventionofcommoncoldametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialstudies
AT jiyunjeong theeffectofprobioticsonpreventionofcommoncoldametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialstudies
AT kangenjin effectofprobioticsonpreventionofcommoncoldametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialstudies
AT kimsooyoung effectofprobioticsonpreventionofcommoncoldametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialstudies
AT hwanginhong effectofprobioticsonpreventionofcommoncoldametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialstudies
AT jiyunjeong effectofprobioticsonpreventionofcommoncoldametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialstudies