Cargando…
The Effect of Probiotics on Prevention of Common Cold: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trial Studies
BACKGROUND: Probiotics are currently under focus for their immune improvement function. Many studies have been performed to assess the potential efficacy of probiotics in allergic disease, viral disease, respiratory disease, as well as gastrointestinal disease. This study performed a systematic revi...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Academy of Family Medicine
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3560336/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23372900 http://dx.doi.org/10.4082/kjfm.2013.34.1.2 |
_version_ | 1782257778567413760 |
---|---|
author | Kang, En-Jin Kim, Soo Young Hwang, In-Hong Ji, Yun-Jeong |
author_facet | Kang, En-Jin Kim, Soo Young Hwang, In-Hong Ji, Yun-Jeong |
author_sort | Kang, En-Jin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Probiotics are currently under focus for their immune improvement function. Many studies have been performed to assess the potential efficacy of probiotics in allergic disease, viral disease, respiratory disease, as well as gastrointestinal disease. This study performed a systematic review to determine the effects of probiotics on the prevention of the common cold. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane CENTRAL for studies released through June 2011. Two authors independently extracted the data. To assess the risk of bias of included literatures, Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool was used. RESULTS: We identified 10 studies in 7 articles. A total 2,894 participants, 1,588 in the probiotics group and 1,306 in the control group, were included. The effect of probiotics on the prevention of the common cold had a relative risk (RR) of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.85 to 1.00, I(2) = 26%). In the subgroup analysis, the RR of administration of probiotics for 3 months or less was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.70 to 0.97). The RR of administration of probiotics over 3 months was 1.00 (95% CI, 0.92 to 1.09). The RR of administration of probiotics without any active intervention (vitamin and mineral) was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.78 to 0.97). CONCLUSION: In this meta-analysis, there was marginal effect of probiotics on the prevention of the common cold. The results implied that probiotics had a modest effect in common cold reduction. The balance of benefit and harms needs to be considered when using probiotics for common cold prevention. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3560336 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | The Korean Academy of Family Medicine |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35603362013-01-31 The Effect of Probiotics on Prevention of Common Cold: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trial Studies Kang, En-Jin Kim, Soo Young Hwang, In-Hong Ji, Yun-Jeong Korean J Fam Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Probiotics are currently under focus for their immune improvement function. Many studies have been performed to assess the potential efficacy of probiotics in allergic disease, viral disease, respiratory disease, as well as gastrointestinal disease. This study performed a systematic review to determine the effects of probiotics on the prevention of the common cold. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane CENTRAL for studies released through June 2011. Two authors independently extracted the data. To assess the risk of bias of included literatures, Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool was used. RESULTS: We identified 10 studies in 7 articles. A total 2,894 participants, 1,588 in the probiotics group and 1,306 in the control group, were included. The effect of probiotics on the prevention of the common cold had a relative risk (RR) of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.85 to 1.00, I(2) = 26%). In the subgroup analysis, the RR of administration of probiotics for 3 months or less was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.70 to 0.97). The RR of administration of probiotics over 3 months was 1.00 (95% CI, 0.92 to 1.09). The RR of administration of probiotics without any active intervention (vitamin and mineral) was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.78 to 0.97). CONCLUSION: In this meta-analysis, there was marginal effect of probiotics on the prevention of the common cold. The results implied that probiotics had a modest effect in common cold reduction. The balance of benefit and harms needs to be considered when using probiotics for common cold prevention. The Korean Academy of Family Medicine 2013-01 2013-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3560336/ /pubmed/23372900 http://dx.doi.org/10.4082/kjfm.2013.34.1.2 Text en Copyright © 2013 The Korean Academy of Family Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kang, En-Jin Kim, Soo Young Hwang, In-Hong Ji, Yun-Jeong The Effect of Probiotics on Prevention of Common Cold: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trial Studies |
title | The Effect of Probiotics on Prevention of Common Cold: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trial Studies |
title_full | The Effect of Probiotics on Prevention of Common Cold: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trial Studies |
title_fullStr | The Effect of Probiotics on Prevention of Common Cold: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trial Studies |
title_full_unstemmed | The Effect of Probiotics on Prevention of Common Cold: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trial Studies |
title_short | The Effect of Probiotics on Prevention of Common Cold: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trial Studies |
title_sort | effect of probiotics on prevention of common cold: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial studies |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3560336/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23372900 http://dx.doi.org/10.4082/kjfm.2013.34.1.2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kangenjin theeffectofprobioticsonpreventionofcommoncoldametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialstudies AT kimsooyoung theeffectofprobioticsonpreventionofcommoncoldametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialstudies AT hwanginhong theeffectofprobioticsonpreventionofcommoncoldametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialstudies AT jiyunjeong theeffectofprobioticsonpreventionofcommoncoldametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialstudies AT kangenjin effectofprobioticsonpreventionofcommoncoldametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialstudies AT kimsooyoung effectofprobioticsonpreventionofcommoncoldametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialstudies AT hwanginhong effectofprobioticsonpreventionofcommoncoldametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialstudies AT jiyunjeong effectofprobioticsonpreventionofcommoncoldametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialstudies |