Cargando…

A new oral otoprotective agent. Part 1: Electrophysiology data from protection against noise-induced hearing loss

BACKGROUND: Data from animal studies show that antioxidants can compensate against noise-induced stress and sensory hair cell death. The aim of this study was to evaluate the otoprotection efficacy of various versions of orally administered Acuval 400(®) against noise damage in a rat animal model. M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cascella, Vincenza, Giordano, Pietro, Hatzopoulos, Stavros, Petruccelli, Joseph, Prosser, Silvano, Simoni, Edi, Astolfi, Laura, Fetoni, Annarita Rita, Skarżyński, Henryk, Martini, Alessandro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3560681/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22207104
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.882180
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Data from animal studies show that antioxidants can compensate against noise-induced stress and sensory hair cell death. The aim of this study was to evaluate the otoprotection efficacy of various versions of orally administered Acuval 400(®) against noise damage in a rat animal model. MATERIAL/METHODS: Fifty-five Sprague Dawley rats were divided into 4 groups: A) noise-exposed animals; B) animals exposed to noise and treated with the Acuval; C) animals exposed to noise and treated with a combination of Coenzyme Q10 and Acuval; D) animals treated only with Acuval and Coenzyme Q10 and with no exposure to noise. All solutions were administered orally 5 times: 24 and 2 hrs prior to noise exposure, and then daily for 3 days. The auditory function was assessed by measuring auditory brainstem responses (ABR) in the range from 2 to 32 kHz at times =1, 7, 14 and 21 days after noise exposure. RESULTS: At low frequencies (click and 4 kHz) animals from both A and B groups showed significant threshold shifts in the majority of the tested frequencies and tested times. For the same frequencies, animals from group C presented threshold levels similar to those from group D. At frequencies ≥8 kHz the protective performance of the 2 Acuval groups is more clearly distinguished from the noise group A. At 32 kHz the 2 Acuval groups perform equally well in terms of otoprotection. Animals in Group D did not show any significant differences in the hearing threshold during the experiment. CONCLUSIONS: The data of this study suggest that a solution containing Coenzyme Q10 and Acuval 400(®), administered orally, protects from noise-induced hearing loss.