Cargando…

Do patients with active RA have differences in disease activity and perceptions if anti-TNF naïve versus anti-TNF experienced? Baseline results of the optimization of adalimumab trial

BACKGROUND: The chance of a good response in RA is attenuated in previous anti-TNF users who start new anti-TNF therapy compared to biologic naïve patients. In active RA, those with previous anti-TNF exposure compared to anti-TNF naïve may have different baseline disease activity and patient percept...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pope, Janet, Thorne, J. Carter, Haraoui, Boulos Paul, Psaradellis, Eliofotisti, Sampalis, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3560709/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22847212
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.883250
_version_ 1782257840776282112
author Pope, Janet
Thorne, J. Carter
Haraoui, Boulos Paul
Psaradellis, Eliofotisti
Sampalis, John
author_facet Pope, Janet
Thorne, J. Carter
Haraoui, Boulos Paul
Psaradellis, Eliofotisti
Sampalis, John
author_sort Pope, Janet
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The chance of a good response in RA is attenuated in previous anti-TNF users who start new anti-TNF therapy compared to biologic naïve patients. In active RA, those with previous anti-TNF exposure compared to anti-TNF naïve may have different baseline disease activity and patient perceptions when starting a new anti-TNF treatment that could explain the observed response differences. MATERIAL/METHODS: The aim of this study was a post hoc analysis of baseline characteristics of patients enrolled in the Optimization of Adalimumab study that was a treat to target vs. routine care study in patients initiating adalimumab. As per the protocol, a maximum of 20% anti-TNF experienced patients were enrolled in the 300 patient trial. Twelve (4.0%) were excluded who previously used other biologics. Baseline characteristics including age, gender, tender and swollen joint counts, disease activity (DAS28), function (HAQ-DI), patient global assessment, patient satisfaction with current treatment, and inflammatory markers (CRP, ESR), were compared between previously anti-TNF experienced [etanercept or infliximab (EXP)], and anti-TNF naïve patients (NAÏVE). RESULTS: The mean (SD) age was 54.8 (13.3) years; 81.0% were female, and 237 (79.0%) were anti-TNF naïve while 51 (17.0%) patients were anti-TNF experienced (29 with etanercept, 16 with infliximab, and 6 for both). The mean (SD) baseline in EXP versus NAÏVE groups respectively was: CRP=21.7(32.9) vs. 17.5(20.7); ESR=28.7(22.5) vs. 29.8(20.4); SJC=10.5(6.0) vs. 10.7(5.6); TJC=12.8(7.1) vs. 12.3(7.3); and DAS28=6.0(1.2) vs. 5.8(1.1). None of the between-group differences were statistically significant, however, the HAQ-DI in EXP was 1.7(0.6) compared to 1.5(0.7) for the NAÏVE (P=0.021). Additionally, EXP patients had a higher patient global score [71.3(26.1) vs. 61.9(26.2), P=0.021]. CONCLUSIONS: Although anti-TNF naïve and experienced patients who initiated adalimumab were similar, with respect to several baseline characteristics, significant differences in subjective measures were observed, which may indicate more severe patient measures (function and global disease activity) in anti-TNF experienced patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3560709
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher International Scientific Literature, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35607092013-04-24 Do patients with active RA have differences in disease activity and perceptions if anti-TNF naïve versus anti-TNF experienced? Baseline results of the optimization of adalimumab trial Pope, Janet Thorne, J. Carter Haraoui, Boulos Paul Psaradellis, Eliofotisti Sampalis, John Med Sci Monit Public Investigation BACKGROUND: The chance of a good response in RA is attenuated in previous anti-TNF users who start new anti-TNF therapy compared to biologic naïve patients. In active RA, those with previous anti-TNF exposure compared to anti-TNF naïve may have different baseline disease activity and patient perceptions when starting a new anti-TNF treatment that could explain the observed response differences. MATERIAL/METHODS: The aim of this study was a post hoc analysis of baseline characteristics of patients enrolled in the Optimization of Adalimumab study that was a treat to target vs. routine care study in patients initiating adalimumab. As per the protocol, a maximum of 20% anti-TNF experienced patients were enrolled in the 300 patient trial. Twelve (4.0%) were excluded who previously used other biologics. Baseline characteristics including age, gender, tender and swollen joint counts, disease activity (DAS28), function (HAQ-DI), patient global assessment, patient satisfaction with current treatment, and inflammatory markers (CRP, ESR), were compared between previously anti-TNF experienced [etanercept or infliximab (EXP)], and anti-TNF naïve patients (NAÏVE). RESULTS: The mean (SD) age was 54.8 (13.3) years; 81.0% were female, and 237 (79.0%) were anti-TNF naïve while 51 (17.0%) patients were anti-TNF experienced (29 with etanercept, 16 with infliximab, and 6 for both). The mean (SD) baseline in EXP versus NAÏVE groups respectively was: CRP=21.7(32.9) vs. 17.5(20.7); ESR=28.7(22.5) vs. 29.8(20.4); SJC=10.5(6.0) vs. 10.7(5.6); TJC=12.8(7.1) vs. 12.3(7.3); and DAS28=6.0(1.2) vs. 5.8(1.1). None of the between-group differences were statistically significant, however, the HAQ-DI in EXP was 1.7(0.6) compared to 1.5(0.7) for the NAÏVE (P=0.021). Additionally, EXP patients had a higher patient global score [71.3(26.1) vs. 61.9(26.2), P=0.021]. CONCLUSIONS: Although anti-TNF naïve and experienced patients who initiated adalimumab were similar, with respect to several baseline characteristics, significant differences in subjective measures were observed, which may indicate more severe patient measures (function and global disease activity) in anti-TNF experienced patients. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2012-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3560709/ /pubmed/22847212 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.883250 Text en © Med Sci Monit, 2012 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.
spellingShingle Public Investigation
Pope, Janet
Thorne, J. Carter
Haraoui, Boulos Paul
Psaradellis, Eliofotisti
Sampalis, John
Do patients with active RA have differences in disease activity and perceptions if anti-TNF naïve versus anti-TNF experienced? Baseline results of the optimization of adalimumab trial
title Do patients with active RA have differences in disease activity and perceptions if anti-TNF naïve versus anti-TNF experienced? Baseline results of the optimization of adalimumab trial
title_full Do patients with active RA have differences in disease activity and perceptions if anti-TNF naïve versus anti-TNF experienced? Baseline results of the optimization of adalimumab trial
title_fullStr Do patients with active RA have differences in disease activity and perceptions if anti-TNF naïve versus anti-TNF experienced? Baseline results of the optimization of adalimumab trial
title_full_unstemmed Do patients with active RA have differences in disease activity and perceptions if anti-TNF naïve versus anti-TNF experienced? Baseline results of the optimization of adalimumab trial
title_short Do patients with active RA have differences in disease activity and perceptions if anti-TNF naïve versus anti-TNF experienced? Baseline results of the optimization of adalimumab trial
title_sort do patients with active ra have differences in disease activity and perceptions if anti-tnf naïve versus anti-tnf experienced? baseline results of the optimization of adalimumab trial
topic Public Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3560709/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22847212
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.883250
work_keys_str_mv AT popejanet dopatientswithactiverahavedifferencesindiseaseactivityandperceptionsifantitnfnaiveversusantitnfexperiencedbaselineresultsoftheoptimizationofadalimumabtrial
AT thornejcarter dopatientswithactiverahavedifferencesindiseaseactivityandperceptionsifantitnfnaiveversusantitnfexperiencedbaselineresultsoftheoptimizationofadalimumabtrial
AT haraouiboulospaul dopatientswithactiverahavedifferencesindiseaseactivityandperceptionsifantitnfnaiveversusantitnfexperiencedbaselineresultsoftheoptimizationofadalimumabtrial
AT psaradelliseliofotisti dopatientswithactiverahavedifferencesindiseaseactivityandperceptionsifantitnfnaiveversusantitnfexperiencedbaselineresultsoftheoptimizationofadalimumabtrial
AT sampalisjohn dopatientswithactiverahavedifferencesindiseaseactivityandperceptionsifantitnfnaiveversusantitnfexperiencedbaselineresultsoftheoptimizationofadalimumabtrial