Cargando…
Comparing CenteringPregnancy® to standard prenatal care plus prenatal education
BACKGROUND: There is significant evidence to support the importance of prenatal care in preventing adverse outcomes such as preterm birth and low infant birth weight. Previous studies have indicated that the benefits of prenatal care are not evenly distributed throughout the social strata. In additi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3561159/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23445830 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-S1-S5 |
_version_ | 1782257916094447616 |
---|---|
author | Benediktsson, Ingunn McDonald, Sheila W Vekved, Monica McNeil, Deborah A Dolan, Siobhan M Tough, Suzanne C |
author_facet | Benediktsson, Ingunn McDonald, Sheila W Vekved, Monica McNeil, Deborah A Dolan, Siobhan M Tough, Suzanne C |
author_sort | Benediktsson, Ingunn |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There is significant evidence to support the importance of prenatal care in preventing adverse outcomes such as preterm birth and low infant birth weight. Previous studies have indicated that the benefits of prenatal care are not evenly distributed throughout the social strata. In addition, emerging evidence suggests that among particular populations, rates of preterm birth are unchanged or increasing. This suggests that an alternate care model is necessary, one that seeks to addresses some of the myriad of social factors that also contribute to adverse birth outcomes. In previous studies, the group prenatal care model CenteringPregnancy® had been shown to reduce adverse birth outcomes, but to date, no comparison had been made with a model that included prenatal education. This study sought to investigate whether any significant difference remained within the comparison groups when both models accounted for social factors. METHODS: This analysis was based on survey data collected from a prospective cohort of pregnant women through the All Our Babies Study in Calgary, Alberta. RESULTS: At baseline, there were significant differences between the comparison groups in their psychosocial health, with the women in the CenteringPregnancy® group scoring higher levels of depressive symptoms, stress and anxiety. At four months postpartum, the differences between the groups were no longer significant. Conclusions: These results suggest that CenteringPregnancy® can recruit and retain a demographically vulnerable group of women with a constellation of risk factors for poor pregnancy and birth outcomes, including poverty, language barriers and poor mental health. Post program, the rates of stress, anxiety and depression were similar to other women with more social and financial advantage. These findings suggest that CenteringPregnancy® may be a community based care strategy that contributes to improved mental health, knowledge, and behaviours to optimize outcomes for mothers and children. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3561159 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35611592013-02-05 Comparing CenteringPregnancy® to standard prenatal care plus prenatal education Benediktsson, Ingunn McDonald, Sheila W Vekved, Monica McNeil, Deborah A Dolan, Siobhan M Tough, Suzanne C BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research BACKGROUND: There is significant evidence to support the importance of prenatal care in preventing adverse outcomes such as preterm birth and low infant birth weight. Previous studies have indicated that the benefits of prenatal care are not evenly distributed throughout the social strata. In addition, emerging evidence suggests that among particular populations, rates of preterm birth are unchanged or increasing. This suggests that an alternate care model is necessary, one that seeks to addresses some of the myriad of social factors that also contribute to adverse birth outcomes. In previous studies, the group prenatal care model CenteringPregnancy® had been shown to reduce adverse birth outcomes, but to date, no comparison had been made with a model that included prenatal education. This study sought to investigate whether any significant difference remained within the comparison groups when both models accounted for social factors. METHODS: This analysis was based on survey data collected from a prospective cohort of pregnant women through the All Our Babies Study in Calgary, Alberta. RESULTS: At baseline, there were significant differences between the comparison groups in their psychosocial health, with the women in the CenteringPregnancy® group scoring higher levels of depressive symptoms, stress and anxiety. At four months postpartum, the differences between the groups were no longer significant. Conclusions: These results suggest that CenteringPregnancy® can recruit and retain a demographically vulnerable group of women with a constellation of risk factors for poor pregnancy and birth outcomes, including poverty, language barriers and poor mental health. Post program, the rates of stress, anxiety and depression were similar to other women with more social and financial advantage. These findings suggest that CenteringPregnancy® may be a community based care strategy that contributes to improved mental health, knowledge, and behaviours to optimize outcomes for mothers and children. BioMed Central 2013-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3561159/ /pubmed/23445830 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-S1-S5 Text en Copyright ©2013 Benediktsson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Benediktsson, Ingunn McDonald, Sheila W Vekved, Monica McNeil, Deborah A Dolan, Siobhan M Tough, Suzanne C Comparing CenteringPregnancy® to standard prenatal care plus prenatal education |
title | Comparing CenteringPregnancy® to standard prenatal care plus prenatal education |
title_full | Comparing CenteringPregnancy® to standard prenatal care plus prenatal education |
title_fullStr | Comparing CenteringPregnancy® to standard prenatal care plus prenatal education |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing CenteringPregnancy® to standard prenatal care plus prenatal education |
title_short | Comparing CenteringPregnancy® to standard prenatal care plus prenatal education |
title_sort | comparing centeringpregnancy® to standard prenatal care plus prenatal education |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3561159/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23445830 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-S1-S5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT benediktssoningunn comparingcenteringpregnancytostandardprenatalcareplusprenataleducation AT mcdonaldsheilaw comparingcenteringpregnancytostandardprenatalcareplusprenataleducation AT vekvedmonica comparingcenteringpregnancytostandardprenatalcareplusprenataleducation AT mcneildeboraha comparingcenteringpregnancytostandardprenatalcareplusprenataleducation AT dolansiobhanm comparingcenteringpregnancytostandardprenatalcareplusprenataleducation AT toughsuzannec comparingcenteringpregnancytostandardprenatalcareplusprenataleducation |