Cargando…

Comparing CenteringPregnancy® to standard prenatal care plus prenatal education

BACKGROUND: There is significant evidence to support the importance of prenatal care in preventing adverse outcomes such as preterm birth and low infant birth weight. Previous studies have indicated that the benefits of prenatal care are not evenly distributed throughout the social strata. In additi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Benediktsson, Ingunn, McDonald, Sheila W, Vekved, Monica, McNeil, Deborah A, Dolan, Siobhan M, Tough, Suzanne C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3561159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23445830
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-S1-S5
_version_ 1782257916094447616
author Benediktsson, Ingunn
McDonald, Sheila W
Vekved, Monica
McNeil, Deborah A
Dolan, Siobhan M
Tough, Suzanne C
author_facet Benediktsson, Ingunn
McDonald, Sheila W
Vekved, Monica
McNeil, Deborah A
Dolan, Siobhan M
Tough, Suzanne C
author_sort Benediktsson, Ingunn
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is significant evidence to support the importance of prenatal care in preventing adverse outcomes such as preterm birth and low infant birth weight. Previous studies have indicated that the benefits of prenatal care are not evenly distributed throughout the social strata. In addition, emerging evidence suggests that among particular populations, rates of preterm birth are unchanged or increasing. This suggests that an alternate care model is necessary, one that seeks to addresses some of the myriad of social factors that also contribute to adverse birth outcomes. In previous studies, the group prenatal care model CenteringPregnancy® had been shown to reduce adverse birth outcomes, but to date, no comparison had been made with a model that included prenatal education. This study sought to investigate whether any significant difference remained within the comparison groups when both models accounted for social factors. METHODS: This analysis was based on survey data collected from a prospective cohort of pregnant women through the All Our Babies Study in Calgary, Alberta. RESULTS: At baseline, there were significant differences between the comparison groups in their psychosocial health, with the women in the CenteringPregnancy® group scoring higher levels of depressive symptoms, stress and anxiety. At four months postpartum, the differences between the groups were no longer significant. Conclusions: These results suggest that CenteringPregnancy® can recruit and retain a demographically vulnerable group of women with a constellation of risk factors for poor pregnancy and birth outcomes, including poverty, language barriers and poor mental health. Post program, the rates of stress, anxiety and depression were similar to other women with more social and financial advantage. These findings suggest that CenteringPregnancy® may be a community based care strategy that contributes to improved mental health, knowledge, and behaviours to optimize outcomes for mothers and children.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3561159
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35611592013-02-05 Comparing CenteringPregnancy® to standard prenatal care plus prenatal education Benediktsson, Ingunn McDonald, Sheila W Vekved, Monica McNeil, Deborah A Dolan, Siobhan M Tough, Suzanne C BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research BACKGROUND: There is significant evidence to support the importance of prenatal care in preventing adverse outcomes such as preterm birth and low infant birth weight. Previous studies have indicated that the benefits of prenatal care are not evenly distributed throughout the social strata. In addition, emerging evidence suggests that among particular populations, rates of preterm birth are unchanged or increasing. This suggests that an alternate care model is necessary, one that seeks to addresses some of the myriad of social factors that also contribute to adverse birth outcomes. In previous studies, the group prenatal care model CenteringPregnancy® had been shown to reduce adverse birth outcomes, but to date, no comparison had been made with a model that included prenatal education. This study sought to investigate whether any significant difference remained within the comparison groups when both models accounted for social factors. METHODS: This analysis was based on survey data collected from a prospective cohort of pregnant women through the All Our Babies Study in Calgary, Alberta. RESULTS: At baseline, there were significant differences between the comparison groups in their psychosocial health, with the women in the CenteringPregnancy® group scoring higher levels of depressive symptoms, stress and anxiety. At four months postpartum, the differences between the groups were no longer significant. Conclusions: These results suggest that CenteringPregnancy® can recruit and retain a demographically vulnerable group of women with a constellation of risk factors for poor pregnancy and birth outcomes, including poverty, language barriers and poor mental health. Post program, the rates of stress, anxiety and depression were similar to other women with more social and financial advantage. These findings suggest that CenteringPregnancy® may be a community based care strategy that contributes to improved mental health, knowledge, and behaviours to optimize outcomes for mothers and children. BioMed Central 2013-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3561159/ /pubmed/23445830 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-S1-S5 Text en Copyright ©2013 Benediktsson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Benediktsson, Ingunn
McDonald, Sheila W
Vekved, Monica
McNeil, Deborah A
Dolan, Siobhan M
Tough, Suzanne C
Comparing CenteringPregnancy® to standard prenatal care plus prenatal education
title Comparing CenteringPregnancy® to standard prenatal care plus prenatal education
title_full Comparing CenteringPregnancy® to standard prenatal care plus prenatal education
title_fullStr Comparing CenteringPregnancy® to standard prenatal care plus prenatal education
title_full_unstemmed Comparing CenteringPregnancy® to standard prenatal care plus prenatal education
title_short Comparing CenteringPregnancy® to standard prenatal care plus prenatal education
title_sort comparing centeringpregnancy® to standard prenatal care plus prenatal education
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3561159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23445830
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-S1-S5
work_keys_str_mv AT benediktssoningunn comparingcenteringpregnancytostandardprenatalcareplusprenataleducation
AT mcdonaldsheilaw comparingcenteringpregnancytostandardprenatalcareplusprenataleducation
AT vekvedmonica comparingcenteringpregnancytostandardprenatalcareplusprenataleducation
AT mcneildeboraha comparingcenteringpregnancytostandardprenatalcareplusprenataleducation
AT dolansiobhanm comparingcenteringpregnancytostandardprenatalcareplusprenataleducation
AT toughsuzannec comparingcenteringpregnancytostandardprenatalcareplusprenataleducation