Cargando…
A pilot cohort analytic study of Family Integrated Care in a Canadian neonatal intensive care unit
BACKGROUND: We have developed a Family Integrated Care (FIC) model for use in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) where parents provide most of the care for their infant, while nurses teach and counsel parents. The objective of this pilot prospective cohort analytic study was to explore the feasib...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3561192/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23445639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-S1-S12 |
_version_ | 1782257923823501312 |
---|---|
author | O’Brien, Karel Bracht, Marianne Macdonell, Kristy McBride, Tammy Robson, Kate O’Leary, Lori Christie, Kristen Galarza, Mary Dicky, Tenzin Levin, Adik Lee, Shoo K |
author_facet | O’Brien, Karel Bracht, Marianne Macdonell, Kristy McBride, Tammy Robson, Kate O’Leary, Lori Christie, Kristen Galarza, Mary Dicky, Tenzin Levin, Adik Lee, Shoo K |
author_sort | O’Brien, Karel |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: We have developed a Family Integrated Care (FIC) model for use in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) where parents provide most of the care for their infant, while nurses teach and counsel parents. The objective of this pilot prospective cohort analytic study was to explore the feasibility, safety, and potential outcomes of implementing this model in a Canadian NICU. METHODS: Infants born ≤35 weeks gestation, receiving continuous positive airway pressure or less respiratory support, with a primary caregiver willing and able to spend ≥8 hours a day with their infant were eligible. Families attended daily education sessions and were mentored at the bedside by nurses. The primary outcome was weight gain, as measured by change in z-score for weight 21 days after enrolment. For each enrolled infant, we identified two matched controls from the previous year’s clinical database. Differences in weight gain between the two groups were analyzed using a linear mixed effects multivariable regression model. We also measured parental stress levels using the Parental Stress Survey: NICU, and interviewed parents and nurses regarding their experiences with FIC. RESULTS: This study included 42 mothers and their infants. Of the enrolled infants, matched control data were available for 31 who completed the study. The rate of change in weight gain was significantly higher in FIC infants compared with control infants (p < 0.05). There was also a significant increase in the incidence of breastfeeding at discharge (82.1 vs. 45.5%, p < 0.05). The mean Parental Stress Survey: NICU score for FIC mothers was 3.06 ± 0.12 at enrolment, which decreased significantly to 2.30 ± 0.13 at discharge (p < 0.05). Feedback from the parents and nurses indicated that FIC was feasible and appropriately implemented. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the FIC model is feasible and safe in a Canadian healthcare setting and results in improved weight gain among preterm infants. In addition, this innovation has the potential to improve other short and long-term infant and family outcomes. A multi-centre randomized controlled trial is needed to further evaluate the efficacy of FIC in the Canadian context. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3561192 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35611922013-02-05 A pilot cohort analytic study of Family Integrated Care in a Canadian neonatal intensive care unit O’Brien, Karel Bracht, Marianne Macdonell, Kristy McBride, Tammy Robson, Kate O’Leary, Lori Christie, Kristen Galarza, Mary Dicky, Tenzin Levin, Adik Lee, Shoo K BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research BACKGROUND: We have developed a Family Integrated Care (FIC) model for use in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) where parents provide most of the care for their infant, while nurses teach and counsel parents. The objective of this pilot prospective cohort analytic study was to explore the feasibility, safety, and potential outcomes of implementing this model in a Canadian NICU. METHODS: Infants born ≤35 weeks gestation, receiving continuous positive airway pressure or less respiratory support, with a primary caregiver willing and able to spend ≥8 hours a day with their infant were eligible. Families attended daily education sessions and were mentored at the bedside by nurses. The primary outcome was weight gain, as measured by change in z-score for weight 21 days after enrolment. For each enrolled infant, we identified two matched controls from the previous year’s clinical database. Differences in weight gain between the two groups were analyzed using a linear mixed effects multivariable regression model. We also measured parental stress levels using the Parental Stress Survey: NICU, and interviewed parents and nurses regarding their experiences with FIC. RESULTS: This study included 42 mothers and their infants. Of the enrolled infants, matched control data were available for 31 who completed the study. The rate of change in weight gain was significantly higher in FIC infants compared with control infants (p < 0.05). There was also a significant increase in the incidence of breastfeeding at discharge (82.1 vs. 45.5%, p < 0.05). The mean Parental Stress Survey: NICU score for FIC mothers was 3.06 ± 0.12 at enrolment, which decreased significantly to 2.30 ± 0.13 at discharge (p < 0.05). Feedback from the parents and nurses indicated that FIC was feasible and appropriately implemented. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the FIC model is feasible and safe in a Canadian healthcare setting and results in improved weight gain among preterm infants. In addition, this innovation has the potential to improve other short and long-term infant and family outcomes. A multi-centre randomized controlled trial is needed to further evaluate the efficacy of FIC in the Canadian context. BioMed Central 2013-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3561192/ /pubmed/23445639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-S1-S12 Text en Copyright ©2013 O’Brien et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research O’Brien, Karel Bracht, Marianne Macdonell, Kristy McBride, Tammy Robson, Kate O’Leary, Lori Christie, Kristen Galarza, Mary Dicky, Tenzin Levin, Adik Lee, Shoo K A pilot cohort analytic study of Family Integrated Care in a Canadian neonatal intensive care unit |
title | A pilot cohort analytic study of Family Integrated Care in a Canadian neonatal intensive care unit |
title_full | A pilot cohort analytic study of Family Integrated Care in a Canadian neonatal intensive care unit |
title_fullStr | A pilot cohort analytic study of Family Integrated Care in a Canadian neonatal intensive care unit |
title_full_unstemmed | A pilot cohort analytic study of Family Integrated Care in a Canadian neonatal intensive care unit |
title_short | A pilot cohort analytic study of Family Integrated Care in a Canadian neonatal intensive care unit |
title_sort | pilot cohort analytic study of family integrated care in a canadian neonatal intensive care unit |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3561192/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23445639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-S1-S12 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT obrienkarel apilotcohortanalyticstudyoffamilyintegratedcareinacanadianneonatalintensivecareunit AT brachtmarianne apilotcohortanalyticstudyoffamilyintegratedcareinacanadianneonatalintensivecareunit AT macdonellkristy apilotcohortanalyticstudyoffamilyintegratedcareinacanadianneonatalintensivecareunit AT mcbridetammy apilotcohortanalyticstudyoffamilyintegratedcareinacanadianneonatalintensivecareunit AT robsonkate apilotcohortanalyticstudyoffamilyintegratedcareinacanadianneonatalintensivecareunit AT olearylori apilotcohortanalyticstudyoffamilyintegratedcareinacanadianneonatalintensivecareunit AT christiekristen apilotcohortanalyticstudyoffamilyintegratedcareinacanadianneonatalintensivecareunit AT galarzamary apilotcohortanalyticstudyoffamilyintegratedcareinacanadianneonatalintensivecareunit AT dickytenzin apilotcohortanalyticstudyoffamilyintegratedcareinacanadianneonatalintensivecareunit AT levinadik apilotcohortanalyticstudyoffamilyintegratedcareinacanadianneonatalintensivecareunit AT leeshook apilotcohortanalyticstudyoffamilyintegratedcareinacanadianneonatalintensivecareunit AT obrienkarel pilotcohortanalyticstudyoffamilyintegratedcareinacanadianneonatalintensivecareunit AT brachtmarianne pilotcohortanalyticstudyoffamilyintegratedcareinacanadianneonatalintensivecareunit AT macdonellkristy pilotcohortanalyticstudyoffamilyintegratedcareinacanadianneonatalintensivecareunit AT mcbridetammy pilotcohortanalyticstudyoffamilyintegratedcareinacanadianneonatalintensivecareunit AT robsonkate pilotcohortanalyticstudyoffamilyintegratedcareinacanadianneonatalintensivecareunit AT olearylori pilotcohortanalyticstudyoffamilyintegratedcareinacanadianneonatalintensivecareunit AT christiekristen pilotcohortanalyticstudyoffamilyintegratedcareinacanadianneonatalintensivecareunit AT galarzamary pilotcohortanalyticstudyoffamilyintegratedcareinacanadianneonatalintensivecareunit AT dickytenzin pilotcohortanalyticstudyoffamilyintegratedcareinacanadianneonatalintensivecareunit AT levinadik pilotcohortanalyticstudyoffamilyintegratedcareinacanadianneonatalintensivecareunit AT leeshook pilotcohortanalyticstudyoffamilyintegratedcareinacanadianneonatalintensivecareunit |