Cargando…

A pilot cohort analytic study of Family Integrated Care in a Canadian neonatal intensive care unit

BACKGROUND: We have developed a Family Integrated Care (FIC) model for use in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) where parents provide most of the care for their infant, while nurses teach and counsel parents. The objective of this pilot prospective cohort analytic study was to explore the feasib...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O’Brien, Karel, Bracht, Marianne, Macdonell, Kristy, McBride, Tammy, Robson, Kate, O’Leary, Lori, Christie, Kristen, Galarza, Mary, Dicky, Tenzin, Levin, Adik, Lee, Shoo K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3561192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23445639
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-S1-S12
_version_ 1782257923823501312
author O’Brien, Karel
Bracht, Marianne
Macdonell, Kristy
McBride, Tammy
Robson, Kate
O’Leary, Lori
Christie, Kristen
Galarza, Mary
Dicky, Tenzin
Levin, Adik
Lee, Shoo K
author_facet O’Brien, Karel
Bracht, Marianne
Macdonell, Kristy
McBride, Tammy
Robson, Kate
O’Leary, Lori
Christie, Kristen
Galarza, Mary
Dicky, Tenzin
Levin, Adik
Lee, Shoo K
author_sort O’Brien, Karel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We have developed a Family Integrated Care (FIC) model for use in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) where parents provide most of the care for their infant, while nurses teach and counsel parents. The objective of this pilot prospective cohort analytic study was to explore the feasibility, safety, and potential outcomes of implementing this model in a Canadian NICU. METHODS: Infants born ≤35 weeks gestation, receiving continuous positive airway pressure or less respiratory support, with a primary caregiver willing and able to spend ≥8 hours a day with their infant were eligible. Families attended daily education sessions and were mentored at the bedside by nurses. The primary outcome was weight gain, as measured by change in z-score for weight 21 days after enrolment. For each enrolled infant, we identified two matched controls from the previous year’s clinical database. Differences in weight gain between the two groups were analyzed using a linear mixed effects multivariable regression model. We also measured parental stress levels using the Parental Stress Survey: NICU, and interviewed parents and nurses regarding their experiences with FIC. RESULTS: This study included 42 mothers and their infants. Of the enrolled infants, matched control data were available for 31 who completed the study. The rate of change in weight gain was significantly higher in FIC infants compared with control infants (p < 0.05). There was also a significant increase in the incidence of breastfeeding at discharge (82.1 vs. 45.5%, p < 0.05). The mean Parental Stress Survey: NICU score for FIC mothers was 3.06 ± 0.12 at enrolment, which decreased significantly to 2.30 ± 0.13 at discharge (p < 0.05). Feedback from the parents and nurses indicated that FIC was feasible and appropriately implemented. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the FIC model is feasible and safe in a Canadian healthcare setting and results in improved weight gain among preterm infants. In addition, this innovation has the potential to improve other short and long-term infant and family outcomes. A multi-centre randomized controlled trial is needed to further evaluate the efficacy of FIC in the Canadian context.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3561192
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35611922013-02-05 A pilot cohort analytic study of Family Integrated Care in a Canadian neonatal intensive care unit O’Brien, Karel Bracht, Marianne Macdonell, Kristy McBride, Tammy Robson, Kate O’Leary, Lori Christie, Kristen Galarza, Mary Dicky, Tenzin Levin, Adik Lee, Shoo K BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research BACKGROUND: We have developed a Family Integrated Care (FIC) model for use in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) where parents provide most of the care for their infant, while nurses teach and counsel parents. The objective of this pilot prospective cohort analytic study was to explore the feasibility, safety, and potential outcomes of implementing this model in a Canadian NICU. METHODS: Infants born ≤35 weeks gestation, receiving continuous positive airway pressure or less respiratory support, with a primary caregiver willing and able to spend ≥8 hours a day with their infant were eligible. Families attended daily education sessions and were mentored at the bedside by nurses. The primary outcome was weight gain, as measured by change in z-score for weight 21 days after enrolment. For each enrolled infant, we identified two matched controls from the previous year’s clinical database. Differences in weight gain between the two groups were analyzed using a linear mixed effects multivariable regression model. We also measured parental stress levels using the Parental Stress Survey: NICU, and interviewed parents and nurses regarding their experiences with FIC. RESULTS: This study included 42 mothers and their infants. Of the enrolled infants, matched control data were available for 31 who completed the study. The rate of change in weight gain was significantly higher in FIC infants compared with control infants (p < 0.05). There was also a significant increase in the incidence of breastfeeding at discharge (82.1 vs. 45.5%, p < 0.05). The mean Parental Stress Survey: NICU score for FIC mothers was 3.06 ± 0.12 at enrolment, which decreased significantly to 2.30 ± 0.13 at discharge (p < 0.05). Feedback from the parents and nurses indicated that FIC was feasible and appropriately implemented. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the FIC model is feasible and safe in a Canadian healthcare setting and results in improved weight gain among preterm infants. In addition, this innovation has the potential to improve other short and long-term infant and family outcomes. A multi-centre randomized controlled trial is needed to further evaluate the efficacy of FIC in the Canadian context. BioMed Central 2013-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3561192/ /pubmed/23445639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-S1-S12 Text en Copyright ©2013 O’Brien et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
O’Brien, Karel
Bracht, Marianne
Macdonell, Kristy
McBride, Tammy
Robson, Kate
O’Leary, Lori
Christie, Kristen
Galarza, Mary
Dicky, Tenzin
Levin, Adik
Lee, Shoo K
A pilot cohort analytic study of Family Integrated Care in a Canadian neonatal intensive care unit
title A pilot cohort analytic study of Family Integrated Care in a Canadian neonatal intensive care unit
title_full A pilot cohort analytic study of Family Integrated Care in a Canadian neonatal intensive care unit
title_fullStr A pilot cohort analytic study of Family Integrated Care in a Canadian neonatal intensive care unit
title_full_unstemmed A pilot cohort analytic study of Family Integrated Care in a Canadian neonatal intensive care unit
title_short A pilot cohort analytic study of Family Integrated Care in a Canadian neonatal intensive care unit
title_sort pilot cohort analytic study of family integrated care in a canadian neonatal intensive care unit
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3561192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23445639
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-S1-S12
work_keys_str_mv AT obrienkarel apilotcohortanalyticstudyoffamilyintegratedcareinacanadianneonatalintensivecareunit
AT brachtmarianne apilotcohortanalyticstudyoffamilyintegratedcareinacanadianneonatalintensivecareunit
AT macdonellkristy apilotcohortanalyticstudyoffamilyintegratedcareinacanadianneonatalintensivecareunit
AT mcbridetammy apilotcohortanalyticstudyoffamilyintegratedcareinacanadianneonatalintensivecareunit
AT robsonkate apilotcohortanalyticstudyoffamilyintegratedcareinacanadianneonatalintensivecareunit
AT olearylori apilotcohortanalyticstudyoffamilyintegratedcareinacanadianneonatalintensivecareunit
AT christiekristen apilotcohortanalyticstudyoffamilyintegratedcareinacanadianneonatalintensivecareunit
AT galarzamary apilotcohortanalyticstudyoffamilyintegratedcareinacanadianneonatalintensivecareunit
AT dickytenzin apilotcohortanalyticstudyoffamilyintegratedcareinacanadianneonatalintensivecareunit
AT levinadik apilotcohortanalyticstudyoffamilyintegratedcareinacanadianneonatalintensivecareunit
AT leeshook apilotcohortanalyticstudyoffamilyintegratedcareinacanadianneonatalintensivecareunit
AT obrienkarel pilotcohortanalyticstudyoffamilyintegratedcareinacanadianneonatalintensivecareunit
AT brachtmarianne pilotcohortanalyticstudyoffamilyintegratedcareinacanadianneonatalintensivecareunit
AT macdonellkristy pilotcohortanalyticstudyoffamilyintegratedcareinacanadianneonatalintensivecareunit
AT mcbridetammy pilotcohortanalyticstudyoffamilyintegratedcareinacanadianneonatalintensivecareunit
AT robsonkate pilotcohortanalyticstudyoffamilyintegratedcareinacanadianneonatalintensivecareunit
AT olearylori pilotcohortanalyticstudyoffamilyintegratedcareinacanadianneonatalintensivecareunit
AT christiekristen pilotcohortanalyticstudyoffamilyintegratedcareinacanadianneonatalintensivecareunit
AT galarzamary pilotcohortanalyticstudyoffamilyintegratedcareinacanadianneonatalintensivecareunit
AT dickytenzin pilotcohortanalyticstudyoffamilyintegratedcareinacanadianneonatalintensivecareunit
AT levinadik pilotcohortanalyticstudyoffamilyintegratedcareinacanadianneonatalintensivecareunit
AT leeshook pilotcohortanalyticstudyoffamilyintegratedcareinacanadianneonatalintensivecareunit