Cargando…
Current and Future Land Use around a Nationwide Protected Area Network
Land-use change around protected areas can reduce their effective size and limit their ability to conserve biodiversity because land-use change alters ecological processes and the ability of organisms to move freely among protected areas. The goal of our analysis was to inform conservation planning...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3561326/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23383275 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055737 |
_version_ | 1782257956323065856 |
---|---|
author | Hamilton, Christopher M. Martinuzzi, Sebastian Plantinga, Andrew J. Radeloff, Volker C. Lewis, David J. Thogmartin, Wayne E. Heglund, Patricia J. Pidgeon, Anna M. |
author_facet | Hamilton, Christopher M. Martinuzzi, Sebastian Plantinga, Andrew J. Radeloff, Volker C. Lewis, David J. Thogmartin, Wayne E. Heglund, Patricia J. Pidgeon, Anna M. |
author_sort | Hamilton, Christopher M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Land-use change around protected areas can reduce their effective size and limit their ability to conserve biodiversity because land-use change alters ecological processes and the ability of organisms to move freely among protected areas. The goal of our analysis was to inform conservation planning efforts for a nationwide network of protected lands by predicting future land use change. We evaluated the relative effect of three economic policy scenarios on land use surrounding the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's National Wildlife Refuges. We predicted changes for three land-use classes (forest/range, crop/pasture, and urban) by 2051. Our results showed an increase in forest/range lands (by 1.9% to 4.7% depending on the scenario), a decrease in crop/pasture between 15.2% and 23.1%, and a substantial increase in urban land use between 28.5% and 57.0%. The magnitude of land-use change differed strongly among different USFWS administrative regions, with the most change in the Upper Midwestern US (approximately 30%), and the Southeastern and Northeastern US (25%), and the rest of the U.S. between 15 and 20%. Among our scenarios, changes in land use were similar, with the exception of our “restricted-urban-growth” scenario, which resulted in noticeably different rates of change. This demonstrates that it will likely be difficult to influence land-use change patterns with national policies and that understanding regional land-use dynamics is critical for effective management and planning of protected lands throughout the U.S. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3561326 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35613262013-02-04 Current and Future Land Use around a Nationwide Protected Area Network Hamilton, Christopher M. Martinuzzi, Sebastian Plantinga, Andrew J. Radeloff, Volker C. Lewis, David J. Thogmartin, Wayne E. Heglund, Patricia J. Pidgeon, Anna M. PLoS One Research Article Land-use change around protected areas can reduce their effective size and limit their ability to conserve biodiversity because land-use change alters ecological processes and the ability of organisms to move freely among protected areas. The goal of our analysis was to inform conservation planning efforts for a nationwide network of protected lands by predicting future land use change. We evaluated the relative effect of three economic policy scenarios on land use surrounding the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's National Wildlife Refuges. We predicted changes for three land-use classes (forest/range, crop/pasture, and urban) by 2051. Our results showed an increase in forest/range lands (by 1.9% to 4.7% depending on the scenario), a decrease in crop/pasture between 15.2% and 23.1%, and a substantial increase in urban land use between 28.5% and 57.0%. The magnitude of land-use change differed strongly among different USFWS administrative regions, with the most change in the Upper Midwestern US (approximately 30%), and the Southeastern and Northeastern US (25%), and the rest of the U.S. between 15 and 20%. Among our scenarios, changes in land use were similar, with the exception of our “restricted-urban-growth” scenario, which resulted in noticeably different rates of change. This demonstrates that it will likely be difficult to influence land-use change patterns with national policies and that understanding regional land-use dynamics is critical for effective management and planning of protected lands throughout the U.S. Public Library of Science 2013-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3561326/ /pubmed/23383275 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055737 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Public Domain declaration, which stipulates that, once placed in the public domain, this work may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hamilton, Christopher M. Martinuzzi, Sebastian Plantinga, Andrew J. Radeloff, Volker C. Lewis, David J. Thogmartin, Wayne E. Heglund, Patricia J. Pidgeon, Anna M. Current and Future Land Use around a Nationwide Protected Area Network |
title | Current and Future Land Use around a Nationwide Protected Area Network |
title_full | Current and Future Land Use around a Nationwide Protected Area Network |
title_fullStr | Current and Future Land Use around a Nationwide Protected Area Network |
title_full_unstemmed | Current and Future Land Use around a Nationwide Protected Area Network |
title_short | Current and Future Land Use around a Nationwide Protected Area Network |
title_sort | current and future land use around a nationwide protected area network |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3561326/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23383275 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055737 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hamiltonchristopherm currentandfuturelandusearoundanationwideprotectedareanetwork AT martinuzzisebastian currentandfuturelandusearoundanationwideprotectedareanetwork AT plantingaandrewj currentandfuturelandusearoundanationwideprotectedareanetwork AT radeloffvolkerc currentandfuturelandusearoundanationwideprotectedareanetwork AT lewisdavidj currentandfuturelandusearoundanationwideprotectedareanetwork AT thogmartinwaynee currentandfuturelandusearoundanationwideprotectedareanetwork AT heglundpatriciaj currentandfuturelandusearoundanationwideprotectedareanetwork AT pidgeonannam currentandfuturelandusearoundanationwideprotectedareanetwork |