Cargando…

Comparative Effectiveness of Homoeopathic vs. Conventional Therapy in Usual Care of Atopic Eczema in Children: Long-Term Medical and Economic Outcomes

BACKGROUND: One in five children visiting a homeopathic physician suffers from atopic eczema. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to examine the long-term effectiveness, safety and costs of homoeopathic vs. conventional treatment in usual medical care of children with atopic eczema. METHODS: In this prospective mu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roll, Stephanie, Reinhold, Thomas, Pach, Daniel, Brinkhaus, Benno, Icke, Katja, Staab, Doris, Jäckel, Tanja, Wegscheider, Karl, Willich, Stefan N., Witt, Claudia M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3561412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23383019
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054973
_version_ 1782257977398394880
author Roll, Stephanie
Reinhold, Thomas
Pach, Daniel
Brinkhaus, Benno
Icke, Katja
Staab, Doris
Jäckel, Tanja
Wegscheider, Karl
Willich, Stefan N.
Witt, Claudia M.
author_facet Roll, Stephanie
Reinhold, Thomas
Pach, Daniel
Brinkhaus, Benno
Icke, Katja
Staab, Doris
Jäckel, Tanja
Wegscheider, Karl
Willich, Stefan N.
Witt, Claudia M.
author_sort Roll, Stephanie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: One in five children visiting a homeopathic physician suffers from atopic eczema. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to examine the long-term effectiveness, safety and costs of homoeopathic vs. conventional treatment in usual medical care of children with atopic eczema. METHODS: In this prospective multi-centre comparative observational non-randomized rater-blinded study, 135 children (48 homoeopathy, 87 conventional) with mild to moderate atopic eczema were included by their respective physicians. Depending on the specialisation of the physician, the primary treatment was either standard conventional treatment or individualized homeopathy as delivered in routine medical care. The main outcome was the SCORAD (SCORing Atopic Dermatitis) at 36 months by a blinded rater. Further outcomes included quality of life, conventional medicine consumption, safety and disease related costs at six, 12 and 36 months after baseline. A multilevel ANCOVA was used, with physician as random effect and the following fixed effects: age, gender, baseline value, severity score, social class and parents’ expectation. RESULTS: The adjusted mean SCORAD showed no significant differences between the groups at 36 months (13.7 95% CI [7.9–19.5] vs. 14.9 [10.4–19.4], p = 0.741). The SCORAD response rates at 36 months were similar in both groups (33% response: homoeopathic 63.9% vs. conventional 64.5%, p = 0.94; 50% response: 52.0% vs. 52.3%, p = 0.974). Total costs were higher in the homoeopathic versus the conventional group (months 31–36 200.54 Euro [132.33–268.76] vs. 68.86 Euro [9.13–128.58], p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Taking patient preferences into account, while being unable to rule out residual confounding, in this long-term observational study, the effects of homoeopathic treatment were not superior to conventional treatment for children with mild to moderate atopic eczema, but involved higher costs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3561412
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35614122013-02-04 Comparative Effectiveness of Homoeopathic vs. Conventional Therapy in Usual Care of Atopic Eczema in Children: Long-Term Medical and Economic Outcomes Roll, Stephanie Reinhold, Thomas Pach, Daniel Brinkhaus, Benno Icke, Katja Staab, Doris Jäckel, Tanja Wegscheider, Karl Willich, Stefan N. Witt, Claudia M. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: One in five children visiting a homeopathic physician suffers from atopic eczema. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to examine the long-term effectiveness, safety and costs of homoeopathic vs. conventional treatment in usual medical care of children with atopic eczema. METHODS: In this prospective multi-centre comparative observational non-randomized rater-blinded study, 135 children (48 homoeopathy, 87 conventional) with mild to moderate atopic eczema were included by their respective physicians. Depending on the specialisation of the physician, the primary treatment was either standard conventional treatment or individualized homeopathy as delivered in routine medical care. The main outcome was the SCORAD (SCORing Atopic Dermatitis) at 36 months by a blinded rater. Further outcomes included quality of life, conventional medicine consumption, safety and disease related costs at six, 12 and 36 months after baseline. A multilevel ANCOVA was used, with physician as random effect and the following fixed effects: age, gender, baseline value, severity score, social class and parents’ expectation. RESULTS: The adjusted mean SCORAD showed no significant differences between the groups at 36 months (13.7 95% CI [7.9–19.5] vs. 14.9 [10.4–19.4], p = 0.741). The SCORAD response rates at 36 months were similar in both groups (33% response: homoeopathic 63.9% vs. conventional 64.5%, p = 0.94; 50% response: 52.0% vs. 52.3%, p = 0.974). Total costs were higher in the homoeopathic versus the conventional group (months 31–36 200.54 Euro [132.33–268.76] vs. 68.86 Euro [9.13–128.58], p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Taking patient preferences into account, while being unable to rule out residual confounding, in this long-term observational study, the effects of homoeopathic treatment were not superior to conventional treatment for children with mild to moderate atopic eczema, but involved higher costs. Public Library of Science 2013-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3561412/ /pubmed/23383019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054973 Text en © 2013 Roll et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Roll, Stephanie
Reinhold, Thomas
Pach, Daniel
Brinkhaus, Benno
Icke, Katja
Staab, Doris
Jäckel, Tanja
Wegscheider, Karl
Willich, Stefan N.
Witt, Claudia M.
Comparative Effectiveness of Homoeopathic vs. Conventional Therapy in Usual Care of Atopic Eczema in Children: Long-Term Medical and Economic Outcomes
title Comparative Effectiveness of Homoeopathic vs. Conventional Therapy in Usual Care of Atopic Eczema in Children: Long-Term Medical and Economic Outcomes
title_full Comparative Effectiveness of Homoeopathic vs. Conventional Therapy in Usual Care of Atopic Eczema in Children: Long-Term Medical and Economic Outcomes
title_fullStr Comparative Effectiveness of Homoeopathic vs. Conventional Therapy in Usual Care of Atopic Eczema in Children: Long-Term Medical and Economic Outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Effectiveness of Homoeopathic vs. Conventional Therapy in Usual Care of Atopic Eczema in Children: Long-Term Medical and Economic Outcomes
title_short Comparative Effectiveness of Homoeopathic vs. Conventional Therapy in Usual Care of Atopic Eczema in Children: Long-Term Medical and Economic Outcomes
title_sort comparative effectiveness of homoeopathic vs. conventional therapy in usual care of atopic eczema in children: long-term medical and economic outcomes
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3561412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23383019
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054973
work_keys_str_mv AT rollstephanie comparativeeffectivenessofhomoeopathicvsconventionaltherapyinusualcareofatopiceczemainchildrenlongtermmedicalandeconomicoutcomes
AT reinholdthomas comparativeeffectivenessofhomoeopathicvsconventionaltherapyinusualcareofatopiceczemainchildrenlongtermmedicalandeconomicoutcomes
AT pachdaniel comparativeeffectivenessofhomoeopathicvsconventionaltherapyinusualcareofatopiceczemainchildrenlongtermmedicalandeconomicoutcomes
AT brinkhausbenno comparativeeffectivenessofhomoeopathicvsconventionaltherapyinusualcareofatopiceczemainchildrenlongtermmedicalandeconomicoutcomes
AT ickekatja comparativeeffectivenessofhomoeopathicvsconventionaltherapyinusualcareofatopiceczemainchildrenlongtermmedicalandeconomicoutcomes
AT staabdoris comparativeeffectivenessofhomoeopathicvsconventionaltherapyinusualcareofatopiceczemainchildrenlongtermmedicalandeconomicoutcomes
AT jackeltanja comparativeeffectivenessofhomoeopathicvsconventionaltherapyinusualcareofatopiceczemainchildrenlongtermmedicalandeconomicoutcomes
AT wegscheiderkarl comparativeeffectivenessofhomoeopathicvsconventionaltherapyinusualcareofatopiceczemainchildrenlongtermmedicalandeconomicoutcomes
AT willichstefann comparativeeffectivenessofhomoeopathicvsconventionaltherapyinusualcareofatopiceczemainchildrenlongtermmedicalandeconomicoutcomes
AT wittclaudiam comparativeeffectivenessofhomoeopathicvsconventionaltherapyinusualcareofatopiceczemainchildrenlongtermmedicalandeconomicoutcomes