Cargando…
The MDM2 309T>G Polymorphism and Ovarian Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis of 1534 Cases and 2211 Controls
BACKGROUND: Recently, there have been a number of studies on the association between MDM2 (Murine Double Minute 2) 309 polymorphism and ovarian cancer risk. However, the results of previous reports remain controversial and ambiguous. Thus, we performed a meta-analysis to explore more precisely the a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3561416/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23383041 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055019 |
_version_ | 1782257978347356160 |
---|---|
author | Ma, Ying-Yu Guan, Tian-Pei Yao, Hai-Bo Yu, Sheng Chen, Le-Gao Xia, Ying-Jie He, Xu-Jun Wang, Hui-Ju Jiang, Xiao-Ting Tao, Hou-Quan |
author_facet | Ma, Ying-Yu Guan, Tian-Pei Yao, Hai-Bo Yu, Sheng Chen, Le-Gao Xia, Ying-Jie He, Xu-Jun Wang, Hui-Ju Jiang, Xiao-Ting Tao, Hou-Quan |
author_sort | Ma, Ying-Yu |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Recently, there have been a number of studies on the association between MDM2 (Murine Double Minute 2) 309 polymorphism and ovarian cancer risk. However, the results of previous reports remain controversial and ambiguous. Thus, we performed a meta-analysis to explore more precisely the association between MDM2 309 polymorphism and the risk of ovarian cancer. METHODS: A meta-analysis was performed to examine the association between MDM2 309T>G polymorphism and ovarian cancer risk. Odds ratio (OR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Our publication search identified a total of 6 studies with 1534 cases and 2211 controls. No significant association was found between MDM2 309T>G polymorphism and ovarian cancer risk in total population analysis. In the subgroup meta-analysis by ethnicity, a negative association was shown in Asian subgroup (G vs. T OR = 0.774, 95% CI = 0.628–0.955, P = 0.017, P (het) = 0.327; GG vs. TT: OR = 0.601, 95% CI = 0.395–0.914, P = 0.017, P (het) = 0.417; dominant model TG+GG vs. TT: OR = 0.661, 95% CI = 0.468–0.934, P = 0.019, P (het) = 0.880), and no significant association in any genetic models among Caucasians was observed. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis provides evidence for the association between MDM2 309 polymorphism and ovarian cancer risk, supporting the hypothesis that MDM2 SNP309 G allele acts as an important ovarian cancer protective factor in Asians but not in Caucasians. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3561416 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35614162013-02-04 The MDM2 309T>G Polymorphism and Ovarian Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis of 1534 Cases and 2211 Controls Ma, Ying-Yu Guan, Tian-Pei Yao, Hai-Bo Yu, Sheng Chen, Le-Gao Xia, Ying-Jie He, Xu-Jun Wang, Hui-Ju Jiang, Xiao-Ting Tao, Hou-Quan PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Recently, there have been a number of studies on the association between MDM2 (Murine Double Minute 2) 309 polymorphism and ovarian cancer risk. However, the results of previous reports remain controversial and ambiguous. Thus, we performed a meta-analysis to explore more precisely the association between MDM2 309 polymorphism and the risk of ovarian cancer. METHODS: A meta-analysis was performed to examine the association between MDM2 309T>G polymorphism and ovarian cancer risk. Odds ratio (OR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Our publication search identified a total of 6 studies with 1534 cases and 2211 controls. No significant association was found between MDM2 309T>G polymorphism and ovarian cancer risk in total population analysis. In the subgroup meta-analysis by ethnicity, a negative association was shown in Asian subgroup (G vs. T OR = 0.774, 95% CI = 0.628–0.955, P = 0.017, P (het) = 0.327; GG vs. TT: OR = 0.601, 95% CI = 0.395–0.914, P = 0.017, P (het) = 0.417; dominant model TG+GG vs. TT: OR = 0.661, 95% CI = 0.468–0.934, P = 0.019, P (het) = 0.880), and no significant association in any genetic models among Caucasians was observed. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis provides evidence for the association between MDM2 309 polymorphism and ovarian cancer risk, supporting the hypothesis that MDM2 SNP309 G allele acts as an important ovarian cancer protective factor in Asians but not in Caucasians. Public Library of Science 2013-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3561416/ /pubmed/23383041 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055019 Text en © 2013 Ma et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ma, Ying-Yu Guan, Tian-Pei Yao, Hai-Bo Yu, Sheng Chen, Le-Gao Xia, Ying-Jie He, Xu-Jun Wang, Hui-Ju Jiang, Xiao-Ting Tao, Hou-Quan The MDM2 309T>G Polymorphism and Ovarian Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis of 1534 Cases and 2211 Controls |
title | The MDM2 309T>G Polymorphism and Ovarian Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis of 1534 Cases and 2211 Controls |
title_full | The MDM2 309T>G Polymorphism and Ovarian Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis of 1534 Cases and 2211 Controls |
title_fullStr | The MDM2 309T>G Polymorphism and Ovarian Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis of 1534 Cases and 2211 Controls |
title_full_unstemmed | The MDM2 309T>G Polymorphism and Ovarian Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis of 1534 Cases and 2211 Controls |
title_short | The MDM2 309T>G Polymorphism and Ovarian Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis of 1534 Cases and 2211 Controls |
title_sort | mdm2 309t>g polymorphism and ovarian cancer risk: a meta-analysis of 1534 cases and 2211 controls |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3561416/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23383041 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055019 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mayingyu themdm2309tgpolymorphismandovariancancerriskametaanalysisof1534casesand2211controls AT guantianpei themdm2309tgpolymorphismandovariancancerriskametaanalysisof1534casesand2211controls AT yaohaibo themdm2309tgpolymorphismandovariancancerriskametaanalysisof1534casesand2211controls AT yusheng themdm2309tgpolymorphismandovariancancerriskametaanalysisof1534casesand2211controls AT chenlegao themdm2309tgpolymorphismandovariancancerriskametaanalysisof1534casesand2211controls AT xiayingjie themdm2309tgpolymorphismandovariancancerriskametaanalysisof1534casesand2211controls AT hexujun themdm2309tgpolymorphismandovariancancerriskametaanalysisof1534casesand2211controls AT wanghuiju themdm2309tgpolymorphismandovariancancerriskametaanalysisof1534casesand2211controls AT jiangxiaoting themdm2309tgpolymorphismandovariancancerriskametaanalysisof1534casesand2211controls AT taohouquan themdm2309tgpolymorphismandovariancancerriskametaanalysisof1534casesand2211controls AT mayingyu mdm2309tgpolymorphismandovariancancerriskametaanalysisof1534casesand2211controls AT guantianpei mdm2309tgpolymorphismandovariancancerriskametaanalysisof1534casesand2211controls AT yaohaibo mdm2309tgpolymorphismandovariancancerriskametaanalysisof1534casesand2211controls AT yusheng mdm2309tgpolymorphismandovariancancerriskametaanalysisof1534casesand2211controls AT chenlegao mdm2309tgpolymorphismandovariancancerriskametaanalysisof1534casesand2211controls AT xiayingjie mdm2309tgpolymorphismandovariancancerriskametaanalysisof1534casesand2211controls AT hexujun mdm2309tgpolymorphismandovariancancerriskametaanalysisof1534casesand2211controls AT wanghuiju mdm2309tgpolymorphismandovariancancerriskametaanalysisof1534casesand2211controls AT jiangxiaoting mdm2309tgpolymorphismandovariancancerriskametaanalysisof1534casesand2211controls AT taohouquan mdm2309tgpolymorphismandovariancancerriskametaanalysisof1534casesand2211controls |