Cargando…

Comparative analysis of three functional predictive assays in lymphocytes of patients with breast and gynaecological cancer treated by radiotherapy

PURPOSE: There is a need to develop predictive tests that would allow identifying cancer patients with a high risk of developing side effects to radiotherapy. We compared the predictive value of three functional assays: the G(0) aberration assay, the G(2) aberration assay and the alkaline comet assa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Padjas, Anna, Kedzierawski, Piotr, Florek, Agnieszka, Kukolowicz, Pawel, Kuszewski, Tomasz, Góźdz, Stanislaw, Lankoff, Anna, Wojcik, Andrzej, Lisowska, Halina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3561604/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23378851
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2012.32556
_version_ 1782257987124985856
author Padjas, Anna
Kedzierawski, Piotr
Florek, Agnieszka
Kukolowicz, Pawel
Kuszewski, Tomasz
Góźdz, Stanislaw
Lankoff, Anna
Wojcik, Andrzej
Lisowska, Halina
author_facet Padjas, Anna
Kedzierawski, Piotr
Florek, Agnieszka
Kukolowicz, Pawel
Kuszewski, Tomasz
Góźdz, Stanislaw
Lankoff, Anna
Wojcik, Andrzej
Lisowska, Halina
author_sort Padjas, Anna
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: There is a need to develop predictive tests that would allow identifying cancer patients with a high risk of developing side effects to radiotherapy. We compared the predictive value of three functional assays: the G(0) aberration assay, the G(2) aberration assay and the alkaline comet assay in lymphocytes of breast cancer and gynaecological cancer patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Peripheral blood was collected from 35 patients with breast cancer and 34 patients with gynaecological cancer before the onset of therapy. Chromosomal aberrations were scored in lymphocytes irradiated in the G(0) or G(2) phase of the cell cycle. DNA repair kinetics was performed with the alkaline comet assay following irradiation of unstimulated lymphocytes. The results were compared with the severity of early and late side effects to radiotherapy. RESULTS: No correlation was observed between the results of the assays and the severity of side effects. Moreover, each assay identified different patients as radiosensitive. CONCLUSIONS: There is no simple correlation between the in vitro sensitivity of lymphocytes and the risk of developing early and late side effects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3561604
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35616042013-02-01 Comparative analysis of three functional predictive assays in lymphocytes of patients with breast and gynaecological cancer treated by radiotherapy Padjas, Anna Kedzierawski, Piotr Florek, Agnieszka Kukolowicz, Pawel Kuszewski, Tomasz Góźdz, Stanislaw Lankoff, Anna Wojcik, Andrzej Lisowska, Halina J Contemp Brachytherapy Original Paper PURPOSE: There is a need to develop predictive tests that would allow identifying cancer patients with a high risk of developing side effects to radiotherapy. We compared the predictive value of three functional assays: the G(0) aberration assay, the G(2) aberration assay and the alkaline comet assay in lymphocytes of breast cancer and gynaecological cancer patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Peripheral blood was collected from 35 patients with breast cancer and 34 patients with gynaecological cancer before the onset of therapy. Chromosomal aberrations were scored in lymphocytes irradiated in the G(0) or G(2) phase of the cell cycle. DNA repair kinetics was performed with the alkaline comet assay following irradiation of unstimulated lymphocytes. The results were compared with the severity of early and late side effects to radiotherapy. RESULTS: No correlation was observed between the results of the assays and the severity of side effects. Moreover, each assay identified different patients as radiosensitive. CONCLUSIONS: There is no simple correlation between the in vitro sensitivity of lymphocytes and the risk of developing early and late side effects. Termedia Publishing House 2012-12-28 2012-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3561604/ /pubmed/23378851 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2012.32556 Text en Copyright © 2012 Termedia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Padjas, Anna
Kedzierawski, Piotr
Florek, Agnieszka
Kukolowicz, Pawel
Kuszewski, Tomasz
Góźdz, Stanislaw
Lankoff, Anna
Wojcik, Andrzej
Lisowska, Halina
Comparative analysis of three functional predictive assays in lymphocytes of patients with breast and gynaecological cancer treated by radiotherapy
title Comparative analysis of three functional predictive assays in lymphocytes of patients with breast and gynaecological cancer treated by radiotherapy
title_full Comparative analysis of three functional predictive assays in lymphocytes of patients with breast and gynaecological cancer treated by radiotherapy
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of three functional predictive assays in lymphocytes of patients with breast and gynaecological cancer treated by radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of three functional predictive assays in lymphocytes of patients with breast and gynaecological cancer treated by radiotherapy
title_short Comparative analysis of three functional predictive assays in lymphocytes of patients with breast and gynaecological cancer treated by radiotherapy
title_sort comparative analysis of three functional predictive assays in lymphocytes of patients with breast and gynaecological cancer treated by radiotherapy
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3561604/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23378851
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2012.32556
work_keys_str_mv AT padjasanna comparativeanalysisofthreefunctionalpredictiveassaysinlymphocytesofpatientswithbreastandgynaecologicalcancertreatedbyradiotherapy
AT kedzierawskipiotr comparativeanalysisofthreefunctionalpredictiveassaysinlymphocytesofpatientswithbreastandgynaecologicalcancertreatedbyradiotherapy
AT florekagnieszka comparativeanalysisofthreefunctionalpredictiveassaysinlymphocytesofpatientswithbreastandgynaecologicalcancertreatedbyradiotherapy
AT kukolowiczpawel comparativeanalysisofthreefunctionalpredictiveassaysinlymphocytesofpatientswithbreastandgynaecologicalcancertreatedbyradiotherapy
AT kuszewskitomasz comparativeanalysisofthreefunctionalpredictiveassaysinlymphocytesofpatientswithbreastandgynaecologicalcancertreatedbyradiotherapy
AT gozdzstanislaw comparativeanalysisofthreefunctionalpredictiveassaysinlymphocytesofpatientswithbreastandgynaecologicalcancertreatedbyradiotherapy
AT lankoffanna comparativeanalysisofthreefunctionalpredictiveassaysinlymphocytesofpatientswithbreastandgynaecologicalcancertreatedbyradiotherapy
AT wojcikandrzej comparativeanalysisofthreefunctionalpredictiveassaysinlymphocytesofpatientswithbreastandgynaecologicalcancertreatedbyradiotherapy
AT lisowskahalina comparativeanalysisofthreefunctionalpredictiveassaysinlymphocytesofpatientswithbreastandgynaecologicalcancertreatedbyradiotherapy