Cargando…
Evaluation of the effectiveness of a semi-finished occlusal appliance – a randomized, controlled clinical trial
INTRODUCTION: Painful temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) are usually treated with physiotherapy, self-exercises, medication-based therapy and splint therapy. For splint therapy different types of splints are available. Therefore this randomized controlled study compared the effectiveness of a semi-f...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3562212/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23351923 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-9-5 |
_version_ | 1782258057861922816 |
---|---|
author | Ficnar, Tobias Middelberg, Claudius Rademacher, Bernd Hessling, Stefan Koch, Raphael Figgener, Ludger |
author_facet | Ficnar, Tobias Middelberg, Claudius Rademacher, Bernd Hessling, Stefan Koch, Raphael Figgener, Ludger |
author_sort | Ficnar, Tobias |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Painful temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) are usually treated with physiotherapy, self-exercises, medication-based therapy and splint therapy. For splint therapy different types of splints are available. Therefore this randomized controlled study compared the effectiveness of a semi-finished occlusal appliance (SB) with a laboratory-made occlusal appliance (SS) in myofascial pain patients. METHOD: The trial subjects allocated to the experimental groups with the (SB) occlusal appliance and those provided with a laboratory-made occlusal appliance (SS) did, in addition, receive conservative treatment (self-exercises, drug-based and manual therapy). The control group was given conservative therapy (CO) only. Overall, a total of 63 patients participated in the study with each group consisting of 21 subjects. RESULTS: When the first follow-up examination took place (14 days after splint insertion) mouth opening within the SB group was significantly enlarged. When the second examination was conducted (2.5 months after splint insertion) mouth opening was significantly enlarged in both splint groups when compared with the initial value. In the control group, no significant enlargement of mouth opening was detected. At no point there was a significant reduction in the number of pressure-sensitive areas of the TMJ. On palpation of the masticatory muscles however, a significant reduction in the number of pressure-sensitive areas could be observed within the CO group and the SS group after 2.5 months. When comparing pain reduction (muscle/joint pain) and mouth opening, no significant differences could be detected between the treatments. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that TMD should be treated conservatively. In cases of restricted mouth opening, the additional use of occlusal appliances can eliminate the patient’s discomfort more quickly. In this context, the tested, semi-finished occlusal appliance appears to offer an immediately available, temporary alternative to laboratory-made splints. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3562212 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35622122013-02-05 Evaluation of the effectiveness of a semi-finished occlusal appliance – a randomized, controlled clinical trial Ficnar, Tobias Middelberg, Claudius Rademacher, Bernd Hessling, Stefan Koch, Raphael Figgener, Ludger Head Face Med Research INTRODUCTION: Painful temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) are usually treated with physiotherapy, self-exercises, medication-based therapy and splint therapy. For splint therapy different types of splints are available. Therefore this randomized controlled study compared the effectiveness of a semi-finished occlusal appliance (SB) with a laboratory-made occlusal appliance (SS) in myofascial pain patients. METHOD: The trial subjects allocated to the experimental groups with the (SB) occlusal appliance and those provided with a laboratory-made occlusal appliance (SS) did, in addition, receive conservative treatment (self-exercises, drug-based and manual therapy). The control group was given conservative therapy (CO) only. Overall, a total of 63 patients participated in the study with each group consisting of 21 subjects. RESULTS: When the first follow-up examination took place (14 days after splint insertion) mouth opening within the SB group was significantly enlarged. When the second examination was conducted (2.5 months after splint insertion) mouth opening was significantly enlarged in both splint groups when compared with the initial value. In the control group, no significant enlargement of mouth opening was detected. At no point there was a significant reduction in the number of pressure-sensitive areas of the TMJ. On palpation of the masticatory muscles however, a significant reduction in the number of pressure-sensitive areas could be observed within the CO group and the SS group after 2.5 months. When comparing pain reduction (muscle/joint pain) and mouth opening, no significant differences could be detected between the treatments. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that TMD should be treated conservatively. In cases of restricted mouth opening, the additional use of occlusal appliances can eliminate the patient’s discomfort more quickly. In this context, the tested, semi-finished occlusal appliance appears to offer an immediately available, temporary alternative to laboratory-made splints. BioMed Central 2013-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3562212/ /pubmed/23351923 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-9-5 Text en Copyright ©2013 Ficnar et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Ficnar, Tobias Middelberg, Claudius Rademacher, Bernd Hessling, Stefan Koch, Raphael Figgener, Ludger Evaluation of the effectiveness of a semi-finished occlusal appliance – a randomized, controlled clinical trial |
title | Evaluation of the effectiveness of a semi-finished occlusal appliance – a randomized, controlled clinical trial |
title_full | Evaluation of the effectiveness of a semi-finished occlusal appliance – a randomized, controlled clinical trial |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the effectiveness of a semi-finished occlusal appliance – a randomized, controlled clinical trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the effectiveness of a semi-finished occlusal appliance – a randomized, controlled clinical trial |
title_short | Evaluation of the effectiveness of a semi-finished occlusal appliance – a randomized, controlled clinical trial |
title_sort | evaluation of the effectiveness of a semi-finished occlusal appliance – a randomized, controlled clinical trial |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3562212/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23351923 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-9-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ficnartobias evaluationoftheeffectivenessofasemifinishedocclusalappliancearandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial AT middelbergclaudius evaluationoftheeffectivenessofasemifinishedocclusalappliancearandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial AT rademacherbernd evaluationoftheeffectivenessofasemifinishedocclusalappliancearandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial AT hesslingstefan evaluationoftheeffectivenessofasemifinishedocclusalappliancearandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial AT kochraphael evaluationoftheeffectivenessofasemifinishedocclusalappliancearandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial AT figgenerludger evaluationoftheeffectivenessofasemifinishedocclusalappliancearandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial |