Cargando…

Protein Complex Formation: Computational Clarification of the Sequential versus Probabilistic Recruitment Puzzle

Our current view on how protein complexes assemble and disassemble at promoter sites is based on experimental data. For instance this data is provided by biochemical methods (e.g. ChIP-on-chip assays) or GFP-based assays. These two approaches suggest very different characteristics for protein recrui...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schölling, Manuel, Thurner, Stefan, Hanel, Rudolf
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3562237/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23383305
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055046
_version_ 1782258063789522944
author Schölling, Manuel
Thurner, Stefan
Hanel, Rudolf
author_facet Schölling, Manuel
Thurner, Stefan
Hanel, Rudolf
author_sort Schölling, Manuel
collection PubMed
description Our current view on how protein complexes assemble and disassemble at promoter sites is based on experimental data. For instance this data is provided by biochemical methods (e.g. ChIP-on-chip assays) or GFP-based assays. These two approaches suggest very different characteristics for protein recruitment processes that regulate and initiate gene transcription. Biochemical methods suggest a strictly ordered and consecutive protein recruitment while GFP-based assays draw a picture much closer to chaotic or stochastic recruitment. To understand the reason for these conflicting results, we design a generalized recruitment model (GRM) that allows to simulate all possible scenarios between strictly sequential recruitment and completely probabilistic recruitment. With this model we show that probabilistic, transient binding events that are visible in GFP experiments can not be detected by ChIP experiments. We demonstrate that sequential recruitment processes and probabilistic recruitment processes that contain “shortcuts” exhibit periodic dynamics and are hard to distinguish with standard ChIP measurements. Therefore we propose a simple experimental method that can be used to discriminate sequential from probabilistic recruitment processes. We discuss the limitations of this method.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3562237
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35622372013-02-04 Protein Complex Formation: Computational Clarification of the Sequential versus Probabilistic Recruitment Puzzle Schölling, Manuel Thurner, Stefan Hanel, Rudolf PLoS One Research Article Our current view on how protein complexes assemble and disassemble at promoter sites is based on experimental data. For instance this data is provided by biochemical methods (e.g. ChIP-on-chip assays) or GFP-based assays. These two approaches suggest very different characteristics for protein recruitment processes that regulate and initiate gene transcription. Biochemical methods suggest a strictly ordered and consecutive protein recruitment while GFP-based assays draw a picture much closer to chaotic or stochastic recruitment. To understand the reason for these conflicting results, we design a generalized recruitment model (GRM) that allows to simulate all possible scenarios between strictly sequential recruitment and completely probabilistic recruitment. With this model we show that probabilistic, transient binding events that are visible in GFP experiments can not be detected by ChIP experiments. We demonstrate that sequential recruitment processes and probabilistic recruitment processes that contain “shortcuts” exhibit periodic dynamics and are hard to distinguish with standard ChIP measurements. Therefore we propose a simple experimental method that can be used to discriminate sequential from probabilistic recruitment processes. We discuss the limitations of this method. Public Library of Science 2013-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3562237/ /pubmed/23383305 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055046 Text en © 2013 Schölling et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Schölling, Manuel
Thurner, Stefan
Hanel, Rudolf
Protein Complex Formation: Computational Clarification of the Sequential versus Probabilistic Recruitment Puzzle
title Protein Complex Formation: Computational Clarification of the Sequential versus Probabilistic Recruitment Puzzle
title_full Protein Complex Formation: Computational Clarification of the Sequential versus Probabilistic Recruitment Puzzle
title_fullStr Protein Complex Formation: Computational Clarification of the Sequential versus Probabilistic Recruitment Puzzle
title_full_unstemmed Protein Complex Formation: Computational Clarification of the Sequential versus Probabilistic Recruitment Puzzle
title_short Protein Complex Formation: Computational Clarification of the Sequential versus Probabilistic Recruitment Puzzle
title_sort protein complex formation: computational clarification of the sequential versus probabilistic recruitment puzzle
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3562237/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23383305
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055046
work_keys_str_mv AT schollingmanuel proteincomplexformationcomputationalclarificationofthesequentialversusprobabilisticrecruitmentpuzzle
AT thurnerstefan proteincomplexformationcomputationalclarificationofthesequentialversusprobabilisticrecruitmentpuzzle
AT hanelrudolf proteincomplexformationcomputationalclarificationofthesequentialversusprobabilisticrecruitmentpuzzle