Cargando…

Evaluation of Xpert MTB/RIF and MODS assay for the diagnosis of pediatric tuberculosis

BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis (TB) in children is rarely confirmed due to the lack of effective diagnostic tools; only 10 to 15% of pediatric TB is smear positive due to paucibacillary samples and the difficulty of obtaining high-quality specimens from children. We evaluate here the accuracy of Xpert MTB...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nhu, Nguyen Thi Quynh, Ha, Dang Thi Minh, Anh, Nguyen Duc, Thu, Do Dang Anh, Duong, Tran Ngoc, Quang, Nguyen Dang, Lan, Nguyen Thi Ngoc, Van Quyet, Tran, Tuyen, Nguyen Thi Bich, Ha, Vo Thi, Giang, Do Chau, Dung, Nguyen Huy, Wolbers, Marcel, Farrar, Jeremy, Caws, Maxine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3562258/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23343418
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-13-31
_version_ 1782258068013187072
author Nhu, Nguyen Thi Quynh
Ha, Dang Thi Minh
Anh, Nguyen Duc
Thu, Do Dang Anh
Duong, Tran Ngoc
Quang, Nguyen Dang
Lan, Nguyen Thi Ngoc
Van Quyet, Tran
Tuyen, Nguyen Thi Bich
Ha, Vo Thi
Giang, Do Chau
Dung, Nguyen Huy
Wolbers, Marcel
Farrar, Jeremy
Caws, Maxine
author_facet Nhu, Nguyen Thi Quynh
Ha, Dang Thi Minh
Anh, Nguyen Duc
Thu, Do Dang Anh
Duong, Tran Ngoc
Quang, Nguyen Dang
Lan, Nguyen Thi Ngoc
Van Quyet, Tran
Tuyen, Nguyen Thi Bich
Ha, Vo Thi
Giang, Do Chau
Dung, Nguyen Huy
Wolbers, Marcel
Farrar, Jeremy
Caws, Maxine
author_sort Nhu, Nguyen Thi Quynh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis (TB) in children is rarely confirmed due to the lack of effective diagnostic tools; only 10 to 15% of pediatric TB is smear positive due to paucibacillary samples and the difficulty of obtaining high-quality specimens from children. We evaluate here the accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF in comparison with the Micoroscopic observation drug susceptibility (MODS) assay for diagnosis of TB in children using samples stored during a previously reported evaluation of the MODS assay. METHODS: Ninety-six eligible children presenting with suspected TB were recruited consecutively at Pham Ngoc Thach Hospital in Ho Chi Minh City Viet Nam between May to December 2008 and tested by Ziehl-Neelsen smear, MODS and Mycobacterial growth Indicator (MGIT, Becton Dickinson) culture. All samples sent by the treating clinician for testing were included in the analysis. An aliquot of processed sample deposit was stored at −20°C and tested in the present study by Xpert MTB/RIF test. 183 samples from 73 children were available for analysis by Xpert. Accuracy measures of MODS and Xpert were summarized. RESULTS: The sensitivity (%) in detecting children with a clinical diagnosis of TB for smear, MODS and Xpert were 37.9 [95% CI 25.5; 51.6], 51.7 [38.2; 65.0] and 50.0 [36.6; 63.4], respectively (per patient analysis). Xpert was significantly more sensitive than smear (P=0.046). Testing of additional samples did not increase case detection for MODS while testing of a second sputum sample by Xpert detected only two additional cases. The positive and negative predictive values (%) of Xpert were 100.0 [88.0; 100.0] and 34.1 [20.5; 49.9], respectively, while those of MODS were 96.8 [83.3; 99.9] and 33.3 [19.6; 49.5]. CONCLUSION: MODS culture and Xpert MTB/RIF test have similar sensitivities for the detection of pediatric TB. Xpert MTB RIF is able to detect tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance within two hours. MODS allows isolation of cultures for further drug susceptibility testing but requires approximately one week to become positive. Testing of multiple samples by xpert detected only two additional cases and the benefits must be considered against costs in each setting. Further research is required to evaluate the optimal integration of Xpert into pediatric testing algorithms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3562258
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35622582013-02-05 Evaluation of Xpert MTB/RIF and MODS assay for the diagnosis of pediatric tuberculosis Nhu, Nguyen Thi Quynh Ha, Dang Thi Minh Anh, Nguyen Duc Thu, Do Dang Anh Duong, Tran Ngoc Quang, Nguyen Dang Lan, Nguyen Thi Ngoc Van Quyet, Tran Tuyen, Nguyen Thi Bich Ha, Vo Thi Giang, Do Chau Dung, Nguyen Huy Wolbers, Marcel Farrar, Jeremy Caws, Maxine BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis (TB) in children is rarely confirmed due to the lack of effective diagnostic tools; only 10 to 15% of pediatric TB is smear positive due to paucibacillary samples and the difficulty of obtaining high-quality specimens from children. We evaluate here the accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF in comparison with the Micoroscopic observation drug susceptibility (MODS) assay for diagnosis of TB in children using samples stored during a previously reported evaluation of the MODS assay. METHODS: Ninety-six eligible children presenting with suspected TB were recruited consecutively at Pham Ngoc Thach Hospital in Ho Chi Minh City Viet Nam between May to December 2008 and tested by Ziehl-Neelsen smear, MODS and Mycobacterial growth Indicator (MGIT, Becton Dickinson) culture. All samples sent by the treating clinician for testing were included in the analysis. An aliquot of processed sample deposit was stored at −20°C and tested in the present study by Xpert MTB/RIF test. 183 samples from 73 children were available for analysis by Xpert. Accuracy measures of MODS and Xpert were summarized. RESULTS: The sensitivity (%) in detecting children with a clinical diagnosis of TB for smear, MODS and Xpert were 37.9 [95% CI 25.5; 51.6], 51.7 [38.2; 65.0] and 50.0 [36.6; 63.4], respectively (per patient analysis). Xpert was significantly more sensitive than smear (P=0.046). Testing of additional samples did not increase case detection for MODS while testing of a second sputum sample by Xpert detected only two additional cases. The positive and negative predictive values (%) of Xpert were 100.0 [88.0; 100.0] and 34.1 [20.5; 49.9], respectively, while those of MODS were 96.8 [83.3; 99.9] and 33.3 [19.6; 49.5]. CONCLUSION: MODS culture and Xpert MTB/RIF test have similar sensitivities for the detection of pediatric TB. Xpert MTB RIF is able to detect tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance within two hours. MODS allows isolation of cultures for further drug susceptibility testing but requires approximately one week to become positive. Testing of multiple samples by xpert detected only two additional cases and the benefits must be considered against costs in each setting. Further research is required to evaluate the optimal integration of Xpert into pediatric testing algorithms. BioMed Central 2013-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3562258/ /pubmed/23343418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-13-31 Text en Copyright ©2013 Nhu et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Nhu, Nguyen Thi Quynh
Ha, Dang Thi Minh
Anh, Nguyen Duc
Thu, Do Dang Anh
Duong, Tran Ngoc
Quang, Nguyen Dang
Lan, Nguyen Thi Ngoc
Van Quyet, Tran
Tuyen, Nguyen Thi Bich
Ha, Vo Thi
Giang, Do Chau
Dung, Nguyen Huy
Wolbers, Marcel
Farrar, Jeremy
Caws, Maxine
Evaluation of Xpert MTB/RIF and MODS assay for the diagnosis of pediatric tuberculosis
title Evaluation of Xpert MTB/RIF and MODS assay for the diagnosis of pediatric tuberculosis
title_full Evaluation of Xpert MTB/RIF and MODS assay for the diagnosis of pediatric tuberculosis
title_fullStr Evaluation of Xpert MTB/RIF and MODS assay for the diagnosis of pediatric tuberculosis
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Xpert MTB/RIF and MODS assay for the diagnosis of pediatric tuberculosis
title_short Evaluation of Xpert MTB/RIF and MODS assay for the diagnosis of pediatric tuberculosis
title_sort evaluation of xpert mtb/rif and mods assay for the diagnosis of pediatric tuberculosis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3562258/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23343418
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-13-31
work_keys_str_mv AT nhunguyenthiquynh evaluationofxpertmtbrifandmodsassayforthediagnosisofpediatrictuberculosis
AT hadangthiminh evaluationofxpertmtbrifandmodsassayforthediagnosisofpediatrictuberculosis
AT anhnguyenduc evaluationofxpertmtbrifandmodsassayforthediagnosisofpediatrictuberculosis
AT thudodanganh evaluationofxpertmtbrifandmodsassayforthediagnosisofpediatrictuberculosis
AT duongtranngoc evaluationofxpertmtbrifandmodsassayforthediagnosisofpediatrictuberculosis
AT quangnguyendang evaluationofxpertmtbrifandmodsassayforthediagnosisofpediatrictuberculosis
AT lannguyenthingoc evaluationofxpertmtbrifandmodsassayforthediagnosisofpediatrictuberculosis
AT vanquyettran evaluationofxpertmtbrifandmodsassayforthediagnosisofpediatrictuberculosis
AT tuyennguyenthibich evaluationofxpertmtbrifandmodsassayforthediagnosisofpediatrictuberculosis
AT havothi evaluationofxpertmtbrifandmodsassayforthediagnosisofpediatrictuberculosis
AT giangdochau evaluationofxpertmtbrifandmodsassayforthediagnosisofpediatrictuberculosis
AT dungnguyenhuy evaluationofxpertmtbrifandmodsassayforthediagnosisofpediatrictuberculosis
AT wolbersmarcel evaluationofxpertmtbrifandmodsassayforthediagnosisofpediatrictuberculosis
AT farrarjeremy evaluationofxpertmtbrifandmodsassayforthediagnosisofpediatrictuberculosis
AT cawsmaxine evaluationofxpertmtbrifandmodsassayforthediagnosisofpediatrictuberculosis