Cargando…
Impact of catheter antimicrobial coating on species-specific risk of catheter colonization: a meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial catheters have been utilized to reduce risk of catheter colonization and infection. We aimed to determine if there is a greater than expected risk of microorganism-specific colonization associated with the use of antimicrobial central venous catheters (CVCs). METHODS: We pe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3562262/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23206897 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2047-2994-1-40 |
_version_ | 1782258068997799936 |
---|---|
author | Novikov, Aleksey Lam, Manuel Y Mermel, Leonard A Casey, Anna L Elliott, Tom S Nightingale, Peter |
author_facet | Novikov, Aleksey Lam, Manuel Y Mermel, Leonard A Casey, Anna L Elliott, Tom S Nightingale, Peter |
author_sort | Novikov, Aleksey |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial catheters have been utilized to reduce risk of catheter colonization and infection. We aimed to determine if there is a greater than expected risk of microorganism-specific colonization associated with the use of antimicrobial central venous catheters (CVCs). METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis of 21 randomized, controlled trials comparing the incidence of specific bacterial and fungal species colonizing antimicrobial CVCs and standard CVCs in hospitalized patients. RESULTS: The proportion of all colonized minocycline-rifampin CVCs found to harbor Candida species was greater than the proportion of all colonized standard CVCs found to have Candida. In comparison, the proportion of colonized chlorhexidine-silver sulfadiazine CVCs specifically colonized with Acinetobacter species or diphtheroids was less than the proportion of similarly colonized standard CVCs. No such differences were found with CVCs colonized with staphylococci. CONCLUSION: Commercially-available antimicrobial CVCs in clinical use may become colonized with distinct microbial flora probably related to their antimicrobial spectrum of activity. Some of these antimicrobial CVCs may therefore have limited additional benefit or more obvious advantages compared to standard CVCs for specific microbial pathogens. The choice of an antimicrobial CVC may be influenced by a number of clinical factors, including a previous history of colonization or infection with Acinetobacter, diphtheroids, or Candida species. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3562262 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35622622013-02-05 Impact of catheter antimicrobial coating on species-specific risk of catheter colonization: a meta-analysis Novikov, Aleksey Lam, Manuel Y Mermel, Leonard A Casey, Anna L Elliott, Tom S Nightingale, Peter Antimicrob Resist Infect Control Research BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial catheters have been utilized to reduce risk of catheter colonization and infection. We aimed to determine if there is a greater than expected risk of microorganism-specific colonization associated with the use of antimicrobial central venous catheters (CVCs). METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis of 21 randomized, controlled trials comparing the incidence of specific bacterial and fungal species colonizing antimicrobial CVCs and standard CVCs in hospitalized patients. RESULTS: The proportion of all colonized minocycline-rifampin CVCs found to harbor Candida species was greater than the proportion of all colonized standard CVCs found to have Candida. In comparison, the proportion of colonized chlorhexidine-silver sulfadiazine CVCs specifically colonized with Acinetobacter species or diphtheroids was less than the proportion of similarly colonized standard CVCs. No such differences were found with CVCs colonized with staphylococci. CONCLUSION: Commercially-available antimicrobial CVCs in clinical use may become colonized with distinct microbial flora probably related to their antimicrobial spectrum of activity. Some of these antimicrobial CVCs may therefore have limited additional benefit or more obvious advantages compared to standard CVCs for specific microbial pathogens. The choice of an antimicrobial CVC may be influenced by a number of clinical factors, including a previous history of colonization or infection with Acinetobacter, diphtheroids, or Candida species. BioMed Central 2012-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3562262/ /pubmed/23206897 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2047-2994-1-40 Text en Copyright ©2012 Novikov et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Novikov, Aleksey Lam, Manuel Y Mermel, Leonard A Casey, Anna L Elliott, Tom S Nightingale, Peter Impact of catheter antimicrobial coating on species-specific risk of catheter colonization: a meta-analysis |
title | Impact of catheter antimicrobial coating on species-specific risk of catheter colonization: a meta-analysis |
title_full | Impact of catheter antimicrobial coating on species-specific risk of catheter colonization: a meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Impact of catheter antimicrobial coating on species-specific risk of catheter colonization: a meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of catheter antimicrobial coating on species-specific risk of catheter colonization: a meta-analysis |
title_short | Impact of catheter antimicrobial coating on species-specific risk of catheter colonization: a meta-analysis |
title_sort | impact of catheter antimicrobial coating on species-specific risk of catheter colonization: a meta-analysis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3562262/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23206897 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2047-2994-1-40 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT novikovaleksey impactofcatheterantimicrobialcoatingonspeciesspecificriskofcathetercolonizationametaanalysis AT lammanuely impactofcatheterantimicrobialcoatingonspeciesspecificriskofcathetercolonizationametaanalysis AT mermelleonarda impactofcatheterantimicrobialcoatingonspeciesspecificriskofcathetercolonizationametaanalysis AT caseyannal impactofcatheterantimicrobialcoatingonspeciesspecificriskofcathetercolonizationametaanalysis AT elliotttoms impactofcatheterantimicrobialcoatingonspeciesspecificriskofcathetercolonizationametaanalysis AT nightingalepeter impactofcatheterantimicrobialcoatingonspeciesspecificriskofcathetercolonizationametaanalysis |