Cargando…

Impact of catheter antimicrobial coating on species-specific risk of catheter colonization: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial catheters have been utilized to reduce risk of catheter colonization and infection. We aimed to determine if there is a greater than expected risk of microorganism-specific colonization associated with the use of antimicrobial central venous catheters (CVCs). METHODS: We pe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Novikov, Aleksey, Lam, Manuel Y, Mermel, Leonard A, Casey, Anna L, Elliott, Tom S, Nightingale, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3562262/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23206897
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2047-2994-1-40
_version_ 1782258068997799936
author Novikov, Aleksey
Lam, Manuel Y
Mermel, Leonard A
Casey, Anna L
Elliott, Tom S
Nightingale, Peter
author_facet Novikov, Aleksey
Lam, Manuel Y
Mermel, Leonard A
Casey, Anna L
Elliott, Tom S
Nightingale, Peter
author_sort Novikov, Aleksey
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial catheters have been utilized to reduce risk of catheter colonization and infection. We aimed to determine if there is a greater than expected risk of microorganism-specific colonization associated with the use of antimicrobial central venous catheters (CVCs). METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis of 21 randomized, controlled trials comparing the incidence of specific bacterial and fungal species colonizing antimicrobial CVCs and standard CVCs in hospitalized patients. RESULTS: The proportion of all colonized minocycline-rifampin CVCs found to harbor Candida species was greater than the proportion of all colonized standard CVCs found to have Candida. In comparison, the proportion of colonized chlorhexidine-silver sulfadiazine CVCs specifically colonized with Acinetobacter species or diphtheroids was less than the proportion of similarly colonized standard CVCs. No such differences were found with CVCs colonized with staphylococci. CONCLUSION: Commercially-available antimicrobial CVCs in clinical use may become colonized with distinct microbial flora probably related to their antimicrobial spectrum of activity. Some of these antimicrobial CVCs may therefore have limited additional benefit or more obvious advantages compared to standard CVCs for specific microbial pathogens. The choice of an antimicrobial CVC may be influenced by a number of clinical factors, including a previous history of colonization or infection with Acinetobacter, diphtheroids, or Candida species.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3562262
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35622622013-02-05 Impact of catheter antimicrobial coating on species-specific risk of catheter colonization: a meta-analysis Novikov, Aleksey Lam, Manuel Y Mermel, Leonard A Casey, Anna L Elliott, Tom S Nightingale, Peter Antimicrob Resist Infect Control Research BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial catheters have been utilized to reduce risk of catheter colonization and infection. We aimed to determine if there is a greater than expected risk of microorganism-specific colonization associated with the use of antimicrobial central venous catheters (CVCs). METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis of 21 randomized, controlled trials comparing the incidence of specific bacterial and fungal species colonizing antimicrobial CVCs and standard CVCs in hospitalized patients. RESULTS: The proportion of all colonized minocycline-rifampin CVCs found to harbor Candida species was greater than the proportion of all colonized standard CVCs found to have Candida. In comparison, the proportion of colonized chlorhexidine-silver sulfadiazine CVCs specifically colonized with Acinetobacter species or diphtheroids was less than the proportion of similarly colonized standard CVCs. No such differences were found with CVCs colonized with staphylococci. CONCLUSION: Commercially-available antimicrobial CVCs in clinical use may become colonized with distinct microbial flora probably related to their antimicrobial spectrum of activity. Some of these antimicrobial CVCs may therefore have limited additional benefit or more obvious advantages compared to standard CVCs for specific microbial pathogens. The choice of an antimicrobial CVC may be influenced by a number of clinical factors, including a previous history of colonization or infection with Acinetobacter, diphtheroids, or Candida species. BioMed Central 2012-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3562262/ /pubmed/23206897 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2047-2994-1-40 Text en Copyright ©2012 Novikov et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Novikov, Aleksey
Lam, Manuel Y
Mermel, Leonard A
Casey, Anna L
Elliott, Tom S
Nightingale, Peter
Impact of catheter antimicrobial coating on species-specific risk of catheter colonization: a meta-analysis
title Impact of catheter antimicrobial coating on species-specific risk of catheter colonization: a meta-analysis
title_full Impact of catheter antimicrobial coating on species-specific risk of catheter colonization: a meta-analysis
title_fullStr Impact of catheter antimicrobial coating on species-specific risk of catheter colonization: a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Impact of catheter antimicrobial coating on species-specific risk of catheter colonization: a meta-analysis
title_short Impact of catheter antimicrobial coating on species-specific risk of catheter colonization: a meta-analysis
title_sort impact of catheter antimicrobial coating on species-specific risk of catheter colonization: a meta-analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3562262/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23206897
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2047-2994-1-40
work_keys_str_mv AT novikovaleksey impactofcatheterantimicrobialcoatingonspeciesspecificriskofcathetercolonizationametaanalysis
AT lammanuely impactofcatheterantimicrobialcoatingonspeciesspecificriskofcathetercolonizationametaanalysis
AT mermelleonarda impactofcatheterantimicrobialcoatingonspeciesspecificriskofcathetercolonizationametaanalysis
AT caseyannal impactofcatheterantimicrobialcoatingonspeciesspecificriskofcathetercolonizationametaanalysis
AT elliotttoms impactofcatheterantimicrobialcoatingonspeciesspecificriskofcathetercolonizationametaanalysis
AT nightingalepeter impactofcatheterantimicrobialcoatingonspeciesspecificriskofcathetercolonizationametaanalysis