Cargando…

Conservative interventions for incontinence in people with dementia or cognitive impairment, living at home: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Dementia is a distressing and disabling illness with worldwide estimates of increased numbers of people with the condition. Two thirds of people with dementia live at home and policies in many countries seek to support more people for longer in this setting. Incontinence both contributes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Drennan, Vari M, Greenwood, Nan, Cole, Laura, Fader, Mandy, Grant, Robert, Rait, Greta, Iliffe, Steve
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3562513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23272951
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-12-77
_version_ 1782258097118511104
author Drennan, Vari M
Greenwood, Nan
Cole, Laura
Fader, Mandy
Grant, Robert
Rait, Greta
Iliffe, Steve
author_facet Drennan, Vari M
Greenwood, Nan
Cole, Laura
Fader, Mandy
Grant, Robert
Rait, Greta
Iliffe, Steve
author_sort Drennan, Vari M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Dementia is a distressing and disabling illness with worldwide estimates of increased numbers of people with the condition. Two thirds of people with dementia live at home and policies in many countries seek to support more people for longer in this setting. Incontinence both contributes to carer burden and is also a significant factor in the decision to move into care homes. A review was conducted for evidence of effectiveness for conservative interventions, which are non-pharmacological and non-surgical interventions, for the prevention or management of incontinence in community dwelling people with dementia. METHOD: Fourteen electronic databases were searched, including MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL (from inception to 2012). Assessments of risk of bias were made. Meta-analysis was inappropriate due to the heterogeneity of the interventions and outcome measurements. A narrative analysis was undertaken. RESULTS: From 427 identified abstracts, 56 studies were examined but only three met the inclusion criteria, all more than a decade old. All three focused on urinary incontinence. Two studies were exploratory or pilot studies. All had a control arm. The interventions were of advice for the carer to implement. Two included toileting education of prompted voiding or an individualised toileting schedule. There was insufficient evidence to support or rule out effectiveness of any of these interventions. Some interventions were unacceptable for some carers. None specifically reported the perspective of the person with dementia. CONCLUSIONS: There was insufficient evidence from any studies to recommend any strategies. There remains an urgent need for both research and also clinical guidance for health professionals tailored to community settings where the majority of people with dementia live.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3562513
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35625132013-02-05 Conservative interventions for incontinence in people with dementia or cognitive impairment, living at home: a systematic review Drennan, Vari M Greenwood, Nan Cole, Laura Fader, Mandy Grant, Robert Rait, Greta Iliffe, Steve BMC Geriatr Research Article BACKGROUND: Dementia is a distressing and disabling illness with worldwide estimates of increased numbers of people with the condition. Two thirds of people with dementia live at home and policies in many countries seek to support more people for longer in this setting. Incontinence both contributes to carer burden and is also a significant factor in the decision to move into care homes. A review was conducted for evidence of effectiveness for conservative interventions, which are non-pharmacological and non-surgical interventions, for the prevention or management of incontinence in community dwelling people with dementia. METHOD: Fourteen electronic databases were searched, including MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL (from inception to 2012). Assessments of risk of bias were made. Meta-analysis was inappropriate due to the heterogeneity of the interventions and outcome measurements. A narrative analysis was undertaken. RESULTS: From 427 identified abstracts, 56 studies were examined but only three met the inclusion criteria, all more than a decade old. All three focused on urinary incontinence. Two studies were exploratory or pilot studies. All had a control arm. The interventions were of advice for the carer to implement. Two included toileting education of prompted voiding or an individualised toileting schedule. There was insufficient evidence to support or rule out effectiveness of any of these interventions. Some interventions were unacceptable for some carers. None specifically reported the perspective of the person with dementia. CONCLUSIONS: There was insufficient evidence from any studies to recommend any strategies. There remains an urgent need for both research and also clinical guidance for health professionals tailored to community settings where the majority of people with dementia live. BioMed Central 2012-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3562513/ /pubmed/23272951 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-12-77 Text en Copyright ©2012 Drennan et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Drennan, Vari M
Greenwood, Nan
Cole, Laura
Fader, Mandy
Grant, Robert
Rait, Greta
Iliffe, Steve
Conservative interventions for incontinence in people with dementia or cognitive impairment, living at home: a systematic review
title Conservative interventions for incontinence in people with dementia or cognitive impairment, living at home: a systematic review
title_full Conservative interventions for incontinence in people with dementia or cognitive impairment, living at home: a systematic review
title_fullStr Conservative interventions for incontinence in people with dementia or cognitive impairment, living at home: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Conservative interventions for incontinence in people with dementia or cognitive impairment, living at home: a systematic review
title_short Conservative interventions for incontinence in people with dementia or cognitive impairment, living at home: a systematic review
title_sort conservative interventions for incontinence in people with dementia or cognitive impairment, living at home: a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3562513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23272951
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-12-77
work_keys_str_mv AT drennanvarim conservativeinterventionsforincontinenceinpeoplewithdementiaorcognitiveimpairmentlivingathomeasystematicreview
AT greenwoodnan conservativeinterventionsforincontinenceinpeoplewithdementiaorcognitiveimpairmentlivingathomeasystematicreview
AT colelaura conservativeinterventionsforincontinenceinpeoplewithdementiaorcognitiveimpairmentlivingathomeasystematicreview
AT fadermandy conservativeinterventionsforincontinenceinpeoplewithdementiaorcognitiveimpairmentlivingathomeasystematicreview
AT grantrobert conservativeinterventionsforincontinenceinpeoplewithdementiaorcognitiveimpairmentlivingathomeasystematicreview
AT raitgreta conservativeinterventionsforincontinenceinpeoplewithdementiaorcognitiveimpairmentlivingathomeasystematicreview
AT iliffesteve conservativeinterventionsforincontinenceinpeoplewithdementiaorcognitiveimpairmentlivingathomeasystematicreview