Cargando…
Combining Blink, Pupil, and Response Time Measures in a Concealed Knowledge Test
The response time (RT) based Concealed Knowledge Test (CKT) has been shown to accurately detect participants’ knowledge of mock-crime-related information. Tests based on ocular measures such as pupil-size and blink-rate have sometimes resulted in poor classification, or lacked detailed classificatio...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3563002/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23382718 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00614 |
_version_ | 1782258131594641408 |
---|---|
author | Seymour, Travis L. Baker, Christopher A. Gaunt, Joshua T. |
author_facet | Seymour, Travis L. Baker, Christopher A. Gaunt, Joshua T. |
author_sort | Seymour, Travis L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The response time (RT) based Concealed Knowledge Test (CKT) has been shown to accurately detect participants’ knowledge of mock-crime-related information. Tests based on ocular measures such as pupil-size and blink-rate have sometimes resulted in poor classification, or lacked detailed classification analyses. The present study examines the fitness of multiple pupil and blink related responses in the CKT paradigm. To maximize classification efficiency, participants’ concealed knowledge was assessed using both individual test measures and combinations of test measures. Results show that individual pupil-size, pupil-slope, and pre-response blink-rate measures produce efficient classifications. Combining pupil and blink measures yielded more accuracy classifications than individual ocular measures. Although RT-based tests proved efficient, combining RT with ocular measures had little incremental benefit. It is argued that covertly assessing ocular measures during RT-based tests may guard against effective countermeasure use in applied settings. A compound classification procedure was used to categorize individual participants and yielded high hit rates and low false-alarm rates without the need for adjustments between test paradigms and subject populations. We conclude that with appropriate test paradigms and classification analyses, ocular measures may prove as effective as other indices, though additional research is needed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3563002 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35630022013-02-04 Combining Blink, Pupil, and Response Time Measures in a Concealed Knowledge Test Seymour, Travis L. Baker, Christopher A. Gaunt, Joshua T. Front Psychol Psychology The response time (RT) based Concealed Knowledge Test (CKT) has been shown to accurately detect participants’ knowledge of mock-crime-related information. Tests based on ocular measures such as pupil-size and blink-rate have sometimes resulted in poor classification, or lacked detailed classification analyses. The present study examines the fitness of multiple pupil and blink related responses in the CKT paradigm. To maximize classification efficiency, participants’ concealed knowledge was assessed using both individual test measures and combinations of test measures. Results show that individual pupil-size, pupil-slope, and pre-response blink-rate measures produce efficient classifications. Combining pupil and blink measures yielded more accuracy classifications than individual ocular measures. Although RT-based tests proved efficient, combining RT with ocular measures had little incremental benefit. It is argued that covertly assessing ocular measures during RT-based tests may guard against effective countermeasure use in applied settings. A compound classification procedure was used to categorize individual participants and yielded high hit rates and low false-alarm rates without the need for adjustments between test paradigms and subject populations. We conclude that with appropriate test paradigms and classification analyses, ocular measures may prove as effective as other indices, though additional research is needed. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3563002/ /pubmed/23382718 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00614 Text en Copyright © 2013 Seymour, Baker and Gaunt. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Seymour, Travis L. Baker, Christopher A. Gaunt, Joshua T. Combining Blink, Pupil, and Response Time Measures in a Concealed Knowledge Test |
title | Combining Blink, Pupil, and Response Time Measures in a Concealed Knowledge Test |
title_full | Combining Blink, Pupil, and Response Time Measures in a Concealed Knowledge Test |
title_fullStr | Combining Blink, Pupil, and Response Time Measures in a Concealed Knowledge Test |
title_full_unstemmed | Combining Blink, Pupil, and Response Time Measures in a Concealed Knowledge Test |
title_short | Combining Blink, Pupil, and Response Time Measures in a Concealed Knowledge Test |
title_sort | combining blink, pupil, and response time measures in a concealed knowledge test |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3563002/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23382718 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00614 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT seymourtravisl combiningblinkpupilandresponsetimemeasuresinaconcealedknowledgetest AT bakerchristophera combiningblinkpupilandresponsetimemeasuresinaconcealedknowledgetest AT gauntjoshuat combiningblinkpupilandresponsetimemeasuresinaconcealedknowledgetest |