Cargando…

Combining Blink, Pupil, and Response Time Measures in a Concealed Knowledge Test

The response time (RT) based Concealed Knowledge Test (CKT) has been shown to accurately detect participants’ knowledge of mock-crime-related information. Tests based on ocular measures such as pupil-size and blink-rate have sometimes resulted in poor classification, or lacked detailed classificatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seymour, Travis L., Baker, Christopher A., Gaunt, Joshua T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3563002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23382718
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00614
_version_ 1782258131594641408
author Seymour, Travis L.
Baker, Christopher A.
Gaunt, Joshua T.
author_facet Seymour, Travis L.
Baker, Christopher A.
Gaunt, Joshua T.
author_sort Seymour, Travis L.
collection PubMed
description The response time (RT) based Concealed Knowledge Test (CKT) has been shown to accurately detect participants’ knowledge of mock-crime-related information. Tests based on ocular measures such as pupil-size and blink-rate have sometimes resulted in poor classification, or lacked detailed classification analyses. The present study examines the fitness of multiple pupil and blink related responses in the CKT paradigm. To maximize classification efficiency, participants’ concealed knowledge was assessed using both individual test measures and combinations of test measures. Results show that individual pupil-size, pupil-slope, and pre-response blink-rate measures produce efficient classifications. Combining pupil and blink measures yielded more accuracy classifications than individual ocular measures. Although RT-based tests proved efficient, combining RT with ocular measures had little incremental benefit. It is argued that covertly assessing ocular measures during RT-based tests may guard against effective countermeasure use in applied settings. A compound classification procedure was used to categorize individual participants and yielded high hit rates and low false-alarm rates without the need for adjustments between test paradigms and subject populations. We conclude that with appropriate test paradigms and classification analyses, ocular measures may prove as effective as other indices, though additional research is needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3563002
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35630022013-02-04 Combining Blink, Pupil, and Response Time Measures in a Concealed Knowledge Test Seymour, Travis L. Baker, Christopher A. Gaunt, Joshua T. Front Psychol Psychology The response time (RT) based Concealed Knowledge Test (CKT) has been shown to accurately detect participants’ knowledge of mock-crime-related information. Tests based on ocular measures such as pupil-size and blink-rate have sometimes resulted in poor classification, or lacked detailed classification analyses. The present study examines the fitness of multiple pupil and blink related responses in the CKT paradigm. To maximize classification efficiency, participants’ concealed knowledge was assessed using both individual test measures and combinations of test measures. Results show that individual pupil-size, pupil-slope, and pre-response blink-rate measures produce efficient classifications. Combining pupil and blink measures yielded more accuracy classifications than individual ocular measures. Although RT-based tests proved efficient, combining RT with ocular measures had little incremental benefit. It is argued that covertly assessing ocular measures during RT-based tests may guard against effective countermeasure use in applied settings. A compound classification procedure was used to categorize individual participants and yielded high hit rates and low false-alarm rates without the need for adjustments between test paradigms and subject populations. We conclude that with appropriate test paradigms and classification analyses, ocular measures may prove as effective as other indices, though additional research is needed. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3563002/ /pubmed/23382718 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00614 Text en Copyright © 2013 Seymour, Baker and Gaunt. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc.
spellingShingle Psychology
Seymour, Travis L.
Baker, Christopher A.
Gaunt, Joshua T.
Combining Blink, Pupil, and Response Time Measures in a Concealed Knowledge Test
title Combining Blink, Pupil, and Response Time Measures in a Concealed Knowledge Test
title_full Combining Blink, Pupil, and Response Time Measures in a Concealed Knowledge Test
title_fullStr Combining Blink, Pupil, and Response Time Measures in a Concealed Knowledge Test
title_full_unstemmed Combining Blink, Pupil, and Response Time Measures in a Concealed Knowledge Test
title_short Combining Blink, Pupil, and Response Time Measures in a Concealed Knowledge Test
title_sort combining blink, pupil, and response time measures in a concealed knowledge test
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3563002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23382718
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00614
work_keys_str_mv AT seymourtravisl combiningblinkpupilandresponsetimemeasuresinaconcealedknowledgetest
AT bakerchristophera combiningblinkpupilandresponsetimemeasuresinaconcealedknowledgetest
AT gauntjoshuat combiningblinkpupilandresponsetimemeasuresinaconcealedknowledgetest